Cargando…
Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
AIMS: Orthodontic care and its effectiveness have increasingly become the focus of political and public attention in the recent past. Therefore, this multicenter cohort study aimed to report about the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments in Germany and to identify potential influencing factors. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3 |
_version_ | 1784771696879730688 |
---|---|
author | Graf, I. Bock, N. C. Bartzela, T. Röper, V. Schumann, U. Reck, K. Christ, H. Höfer, K. Fritz, U. Wiechmann, D. Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G. Wolf, M. Ruf, S. Braumann, B. |
author_facet | Graf, I. Bock, N. C. Bartzela, T. Röper, V. Schumann, U. Reck, K. Christ, H. Höfer, K. Fritz, U. Wiechmann, D. Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G. Wolf, M. Ruf, S. Braumann, B. |
author_sort | Graf, I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Orthodontic care and its effectiveness have increasingly become the focus of political and public attention in the recent past. Therefore, this multicenter cohort study aimed to report about the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments in Germany and to identify potential influencing factors. METHODS: A total of 586 patients from seven German study centers were screened for this cohort study, of which 361 patients were recruited at the end of their orthodontic treatment. Of these, 26 patients had missing study models and/or missing treatment information. Thus, 335 participants were included. The severity of malocclusion was rated using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index at baseline (T0) retrospectively and—prospectively—after the retention period (T1). Practitioner-, treatment- and patient-related information were analyzed in order to detect potential predictive factors for treatment effectiveness. RESULTS: Study participants (202 female and 133 male) were on average 14.8 (standard deviation [SD] ± 6.1) years old at start of active treatment. Average PAR score at T0 was 25.96 (SD ± 10.75) and mean posttreatment PAR score was 3.67 (SD ± 2.98) at T1. An average decrease of total PAR score by 22.30 points (SD ± 10.73) or 83.54% (SD ± 14.58; p < 0.001) was detected. Furthermore, 164 treatments (49.1%) were categorized as ‘greatly improved’ but only 3 treatments (0.9%) as ‘worse or no different’; 81.5% of all cases finished with a high-quality treatment outcome (≤5 PAR points at T1). Logistic regression analyses detected staff experience as a significant predictive factor for high-quality results (odds ratio 1.27, p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.46). CONCLUSION: The improvement rate among this selected German cohort indicated an overall very good standard of orthodontic treatment. Staff experience proved to be a predictive factor for high-quality results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9395451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93954512022-08-24 Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors Graf, I. Bock, N. C. Bartzela, T. Röper, V. Schumann, U. Reck, K. Christ, H. Höfer, K. Fritz, U. Wiechmann, D. Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G. Wolf, M. Ruf, S. Braumann, B. J Orofac Orthop Original Article AIMS: Orthodontic care and its effectiveness have increasingly become the focus of political and public attention in the recent past. Therefore, this multicenter cohort study aimed to report about the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments in Germany and to identify potential influencing factors. METHODS: A total of 586 patients from seven German study centers were screened for this cohort study, of which 361 patients were recruited at the end of their orthodontic treatment. Of these, 26 patients had missing study models and/or missing treatment information. Thus, 335 participants were included. The severity of malocclusion was rated using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index at baseline (T0) retrospectively and—prospectively—after the retention period (T1). Practitioner-, treatment- and patient-related information were analyzed in order to detect potential predictive factors for treatment effectiveness. RESULTS: Study participants (202 female and 133 male) were on average 14.8 (standard deviation [SD] ± 6.1) years old at start of active treatment. Average PAR score at T0 was 25.96 (SD ± 10.75) and mean posttreatment PAR score was 3.67 (SD ± 2.98) at T1. An average decrease of total PAR score by 22.30 points (SD ± 10.73) or 83.54% (SD ± 14.58; p < 0.001) was detected. Furthermore, 164 treatments (49.1%) were categorized as ‘greatly improved’ but only 3 treatments (0.9%) as ‘worse or no different’; 81.5% of all cases finished with a high-quality treatment outcome (≤5 PAR points at T1). Logistic regression analyses detected staff experience as a significant predictive factor for high-quality results (odds ratio 1.27, p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.46). CONCLUSION: The improvement rate among this selected German cohort indicated an overall very good standard of orthodontic treatment. Staff experience proved to be a predictive factor for high-quality results. Springer Medizin 2021-06-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9395451/ /pubmed/34142175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Graf, I. Bock, N. C. Bartzela, T. Röper, V. Schumann, U. Reck, K. Christ, H. Höfer, K. Fritz, U. Wiechmann, D. Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G. Wolf, M. Ruf, S. Braumann, B. Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors |
title | Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors |
title_full | Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors |
title_fullStr | Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors |
title_short | Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors |
title_sort | quality of orthodontic care—a multicenter cohort study in germany: part 1: evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grafi qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT bocknc qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT bartzelat qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT roperv qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT schumannu qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT reckk qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT christh qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT hoferk qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT fritzu qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT wiechmannd qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT jostbrinkmannpg qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT wolfm qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT rufs qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors AT braumannb qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors |