Cargando…

Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors

AIMS: Orthodontic care and its effectiveness have increasingly become the focus of political and public attention in the recent past. Therefore, this multicenter cohort study aimed to report about the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments in Germany and to identify potential influencing factors. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graf, I., Bock, N. C., Bartzela, T., Röper, V., Schumann, U., Reck, K., Christ, H., Höfer, K., Fritz, U., Wiechmann, D., Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G., Wolf, M., Ruf, S., Braumann, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3
_version_ 1784771696879730688
author Graf, I.
Bock, N. C.
Bartzela, T.
Röper, V.
Schumann, U.
Reck, K.
Christ, H.
Höfer, K.
Fritz, U.
Wiechmann, D.
Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G.
Wolf, M.
Ruf, S.
Braumann, B.
author_facet Graf, I.
Bock, N. C.
Bartzela, T.
Röper, V.
Schumann, U.
Reck, K.
Christ, H.
Höfer, K.
Fritz, U.
Wiechmann, D.
Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G.
Wolf, M.
Ruf, S.
Braumann, B.
author_sort Graf, I.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Orthodontic care and its effectiveness have increasingly become the focus of political and public attention in the recent past. Therefore, this multicenter cohort study aimed to report about the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments in Germany and to identify potential influencing factors. METHODS: A total of 586 patients from seven German study centers were screened for this cohort study, of which 361 patients were recruited at the end of their orthodontic treatment. Of these, 26 patients had missing study models and/or missing treatment information. Thus, 335 participants were included. The severity of malocclusion was rated using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index at baseline (T0) retrospectively and—prospectively—after the retention period (T1). Practitioner-, treatment- and patient-related information were analyzed in order to detect potential predictive factors for treatment effectiveness. RESULTS: Study participants (202 female and 133 male) were on average 14.8 (standard deviation [SD] ± 6.1) years old at start of active treatment. Average PAR score at T0 was 25.96 (SD ± 10.75) and mean posttreatment PAR score was 3.67 (SD ± 2.98) at T1. An average decrease of total PAR score by 22.30 points (SD ± 10.73) or 83.54% (SD ± 14.58; p < 0.001) was detected. Furthermore, 164 treatments (49.1%) were categorized as ‘greatly improved’ but only 3 treatments (0.9%) as ‘worse or no different’; 81.5% of all cases finished with a high-quality treatment outcome (≤5 PAR points at T1). Logistic regression analyses detected staff experience as a significant predictive factor for high-quality results (odds ratio 1.27, p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.46). CONCLUSION: The improvement rate among this selected German cohort indicated an overall very good standard of orthodontic treatment. Staff experience proved to be a predictive factor for high-quality results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9395451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93954512022-08-24 Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors Graf, I. Bock, N. C. Bartzela, T. Röper, V. Schumann, U. Reck, K. Christ, H. Höfer, K. Fritz, U. Wiechmann, D. Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G. Wolf, M. Ruf, S. Braumann, B. J Orofac Orthop Original Article AIMS: Orthodontic care and its effectiveness have increasingly become the focus of political and public attention in the recent past. Therefore, this multicenter cohort study aimed to report about the effectiveness of orthodontic treatments in Germany and to identify potential influencing factors. METHODS: A total of 586 patients from seven German study centers were screened for this cohort study, of which 361 patients were recruited at the end of their orthodontic treatment. Of these, 26 patients had missing study models and/or missing treatment information. Thus, 335 participants were included. The severity of malocclusion was rated using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index at baseline (T0) retrospectively and—prospectively—after the retention period (T1). Practitioner-, treatment- and patient-related information were analyzed in order to detect potential predictive factors for treatment effectiveness. RESULTS: Study participants (202 female and 133 male) were on average 14.8 (standard deviation [SD] ± 6.1) years old at start of active treatment. Average PAR score at T0 was 25.96 (SD ± 10.75) and mean posttreatment PAR score was 3.67 (SD ± 2.98) at T1. An average decrease of total PAR score by 22.30 points (SD ± 10.73) or 83.54% (SD ± 14.58; p < 0.001) was detected. Furthermore, 164 treatments (49.1%) were categorized as ‘greatly improved’ but only 3 treatments (0.9%) as ‘worse or no different’; 81.5% of all cases finished with a high-quality treatment outcome (≤5 PAR points at T1). Logistic regression analyses detected staff experience as a significant predictive factor for high-quality results (odds ratio 1.27, p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.46). CONCLUSION: The improvement rate among this selected German cohort indicated an overall very good standard of orthodontic treatment. Staff experience proved to be a predictive factor for high-quality results. Springer Medizin 2021-06-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9395451/ /pubmed/34142175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Graf, I.
Bock, N. C.
Bartzela, T.
Röper, V.
Schumann, U.
Reck, K.
Christ, H.
Höfer, K.
Fritz, U.
Wiechmann, D.
Jost-Brinkmann, P.-G.
Wolf, M.
Ruf, S.
Braumann, B.
Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
title Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
title_full Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
title_fullStr Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
title_full_unstemmed Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
title_short Quality of orthodontic care—A multicenter cohort study in Germany: Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
title_sort quality of orthodontic care—a multicenter cohort study in germany: part 1: evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34142175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00304-3
work_keys_str_mv AT grafi qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT bocknc qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT bartzelat qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT roperv qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT schumannu qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT reckk qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT christh qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT hoferk qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT fritzu qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT wiechmannd qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT jostbrinkmannpg qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT wolfm qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT rufs qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors
AT braumannb qualityoforthodonticcareamulticentercohortstudyingermanypart1evaluationofeffectivenessoforthodontictreatmentsandpredictivefactors