Cargando…

Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation

Proprioceptive acuity is of great significance in basic research exploring a possible neural mechanism of fine motor control and in neurorehabilitation practice promoting motor function recovery of limb-disabled people. Moreover, body representation relies on the integration of multiple somatic sens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Yunxiang, Tanaka, Kento, Yang, Man, Izumi, Shinichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.924123
_version_ 1784771736135270400
author Xia, Yunxiang
Tanaka, Kento
Yang, Man
Izumi, Shinichi
author_facet Xia, Yunxiang
Tanaka, Kento
Yang, Man
Izumi, Shinichi
author_sort Xia, Yunxiang
collection PubMed
description Proprioceptive acuity is of great significance in basic research exploring a possible neural mechanism of fine motor control and in neurorehabilitation practice promoting motor function recovery of limb-disabled people. Moreover, body representation relies on the integration of multiple somatic sensations, including proprioception that is mainly generated in muscles and tendons of human joints. This study aimed to examine two hypotheses: First, different extension positions of wrist joint have different proprioceptive acuities, which might indicate different body representations of wrist joint in the brain. Second, repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) applied peripherally to the forearm radial nerve and extensors could change proprioceptive acuity at the wrist joint. Thirty-five healthy participants were recruited then randomly divided into the real stimulation group (n = 15) and the sham stimulation group (n = 20). The participants’ non-dominant side wrist joint position sense was tested at six extension positions within the physiological joint motion range (i.e., 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°) both before stimulation and after stimulation. Results showed that proprioceptive bias (arithmetic difference of target position and replicated position) among six extension positions could be divided into lower-extension position (i.e., 10°, 20°, 30°) and higher-extension position (i.e., 40°, 50°, 60°). One session rPMS could influence proprioceptive bias in lower-extension position but not in higher-extension position. However, proprioceptive precision (standard deviation within lower-extension position and higher-extension position) was not influenced. To conclude, proprioceptive bias may vary between different wrist extension positions due to different hand postures being related to changes in body representation, and different functions relating to proprioceptive bias and proprioceptive precision may underlie two aspects of body representation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9395609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93956092022-08-24 Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation Xia, Yunxiang Tanaka, Kento Yang, Man Izumi, Shinichi Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Proprioceptive acuity is of great significance in basic research exploring a possible neural mechanism of fine motor control and in neurorehabilitation practice promoting motor function recovery of limb-disabled people. Moreover, body representation relies on the integration of multiple somatic sensations, including proprioception that is mainly generated in muscles and tendons of human joints. This study aimed to examine two hypotheses: First, different extension positions of wrist joint have different proprioceptive acuities, which might indicate different body representations of wrist joint in the brain. Second, repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) applied peripherally to the forearm radial nerve and extensors could change proprioceptive acuity at the wrist joint. Thirty-five healthy participants were recruited then randomly divided into the real stimulation group (n = 15) and the sham stimulation group (n = 20). The participants’ non-dominant side wrist joint position sense was tested at six extension positions within the physiological joint motion range (i.e., 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°) both before stimulation and after stimulation. Results showed that proprioceptive bias (arithmetic difference of target position and replicated position) among six extension positions could be divided into lower-extension position (i.e., 10°, 20°, 30°) and higher-extension position (i.e., 40°, 50°, 60°). One session rPMS could influence proprioceptive bias in lower-extension position but not in higher-extension position. However, proprioceptive precision (standard deviation within lower-extension position and higher-extension position) was not influenced. To conclude, proprioceptive bias may vary between different wrist extension positions due to different hand postures being related to changes in body representation, and different functions relating to proprioceptive bias and proprioceptive precision may underlie two aspects of body representation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9395609/ /pubmed/36016664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.924123 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xia, Tanaka, Yang and Izumi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Xia, Yunxiang
Tanaka, Kento
Yang, Man
Izumi, Shinichi
Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
title Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
title_full Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
title_fullStr Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
title_short Body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
title_sort body representation underlies response of proprioceptive acuity to repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.924123
work_keys_str_mv AT xiayunxiang bodyrepresentationunderliesresponseofproprioceptiveacuitytorepetitiveperipheralmagneticstimulation
AT tanakakento bodyrepresentationunderliesresponseofproprioceptiveacuitytorepetitiveperipheralmagneticstimulation
AT yangman bodyrepresentationunderliesresponseofproprioceptiveacuitytorepetitiveperipheralmagneticstimulation
AT izumishinichi bodyrepresentationunderliesresponseofproprioceptiveacuitytorepetitiveperipheralmagneticstimulation