Cargando…

Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms

BACKGROUND: The effect of region of interest (ROI) size variation on producing accurate noise levels is not yet studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of ROI sizes on the accuracy of noise measurement in computed tomography (CT) by using images of a computational and American...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anam, Choirul, Triadyaksa, Pandji, Naufal, Ariij, Arifin, Zaenal, Muhlisin, Zaenul, Setiawati, Evi, Budi, Wahyu Setia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059282
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2202-1457
_version_ 1784771739796897792
author Anam, Choirul
Triadyaksa, Pandji
Naufal, Ariij
Arifin, Zaenal
Muhlisin, Zaenul
Setiawati, Evi
Budi, Wahyu Setia
author_facet Anam, Choirul
Triadyaksa, Pandji
Naufal, Ariij
Arifin, Zaenal
Muhlisin, Zaenul
Setiawati, Evi
Budi, Wahyu Setia
author_sort Anam, Choirul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of region of interest (ROI) size variation on producing accurate noise levels is not yet studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of ROI sizes on the accuracy of noise measurement in computed tomography (CT) by using images of a computational and American College of Radiology (ACR) phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this experimental study, two phantoms were used, including computational and ACR phantoms. A computational phantom was developed by using Matlab R215a software (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA Natick, MA) with a homogeneously +100 Hounsfield Unit (HU) value and an added-Gaussian noise with various levels of 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 HU. The ACR phantom was scanned with a Philips MX-16 slice CT scanner in different slice thicknesses of 1.5, 3, 5, and 7 mm to obtain noise variation. Noise measurement was conducted at the center of the phantom images and four locations close to the edge of the phantom images using different ROI sizes from 3 × 3 to 41 × 41 pixels, with an increased size of 2 × 2 pixels. RESULTS: The use of a minimum ROI size of 21 × 21 pixels shows noise in the range of ± 5% ground truth noise. The measured noise increases above the ± 5% range if the used ROI is smaller than 21 × 21 pixels. CONCLUSION: A minimum acceptable ROI size is required to maintain the accuracy of noise measurement with a size of 21 × 21 pixels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9395624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93956242022-09-02 Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms Anam, Choirul Triadyaksa, Pandji Naufal, Ariij Arifin, Zaenal Muhlisin, Zaenul Setiawati, Evi Budi, Wahyu Setia J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: The effect of region of interest (ROI) size variation on producing accurate noise levels is not yet studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of ROI sizes on the accuracy of noise measurement in computed tomography (CT) by using images of a computational and American College of Radiology (ACR) phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this experimental study, two phantoms were used, including computational and ACR phantoms. A computational phantom was developed by using Matlab R215a software (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA Natick, MA) with a homogeneously +100 Hounsfield Unit (HU) value and an added-Gaussian noise with various levels of 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 HU. The ACR phantom was scanned with a Philips MX-16 slice CT scanner in different slice thicknesses of 1.5, 3, 5, and 7 mm to obtain noise variation. Noise measurement was conducted at the center of the phantom images and four locations close to the edge of the phantom images using different ROI sizes from 3 × 3 to 41 × 41 pixels, with an increased size of 2 × 2 pixels. RESULTS: The use of a minimum ROI size of 21 × 21 pixels shows noise in the range of ± 5% ground truth noise. The measured noise increases above the ± 5% range if the used ROI is smaller than 21 × 21 pixels. CONCLUSION: A minimum acceptable ROI size is required to maintain the accuracy of noise measurement with a size of 21 × 21 pixels. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9395624/ /pubmed/36059282 http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2202-1457 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Anam, Choirul
Triadyaksa, Pandji
Naufal, Ariij
Arifin, Zaenal
Muhlisin, Zaenul
Setiawati, Evi
Budi, Wahyu Setia
Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms
title Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms
title_full Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms
title_fullStr Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms
title_short Impact of ROI Size on the Accuracy of Noise Measurement in CT on Computational and ACR Phantoms
title_sort impact of roi size on the accuracy of noise measurement in ct on computational and acr phantoms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36059282
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2202-1457
work_keys_str_mv AT anamchoirul impactofroisizeontheaccuracyofnoisemeasurementinctoncomputationalandacrphantoms
AT triadyaksapandji impactofroisizeontheaccuracyofnoisemeasurementinctoncomputationalandacrphantoms
AT naufalariij impactofroisizeontheaccuracyofnoisemeasurementinctoncomputationalandacrphantoms
AT arifinzaenal impactofroisizeontheaccuracyofnoisemeasurementinctoncomputationalandacrphantoms
AT muhlisinzaenul impactofroisizeontheaccuracyofnoisemeasurementinctoncomputationalandacrphantoms
AT setiawatievi impactofroisizeontheaccuracyofnoisemeasurementinctoncomputationalandacrphantoms
AT budiwahyusetia impactofroisizeontheaccuracyofnoisemeasurementinctoncomputationalandacrphantoms