Cargando…

Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations

Performing longitudinal and consistent risk assessments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to help guide treatment decisions to achieve early on and maintain a low‐risk status and improve patient morbidity and mortality. Clinical gestalt or expert perception alone m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Melisa, Keeley, Jennifer, Kingman, Martha, McDevitt, Susanne, Brewer, Jacqueline, Rogers, Frances, Hill, Wendy, Rideman, Zachary, Broderick, Meredith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12106
_version_ 1784771759424143360
author Wilson, Melisa
Keeley, Jennifer
Kingman, Martha
McDevitt, Susanne
Brewer, Jacqueline
Rogers, Frances
Hill, Wendy
Rideman, Zachary
Broderick, Meredith
author_facet Wilson, Melisa
Keeley, Jennifer
Kingman, Martha
McDevitt, Susanne
Brewer, Jacqueline
Rogers, Frances
Hill, Wendy
Rideman, Zachary
Broderick, Meredith
author_sort Wilson, Melisa
collection PubMed
description Performing longitudinal and consistent risk assessments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to help guide treatment decisions to achieve early on and maintain a low‐risk status and improve patient morbidity and mortality. Clinical gestalt or expert perception alone may over or underestimate a patient's risk status. Indeed, regular and continued use of validated risk assessment tools more accurately predict patients' survival. Effective PAH risk assessments are often underutilized even though many seasoned clinicians will attest to using these tools routinely. We present recommendations based on real‐world experience in varied clinical practice settings around the United States for overcoming barriers to facilitate regular, serial formal risk assessment. Expert advanced practice provider clinicians from mid to large‐size medical centers collaborated to formulate recommendations based on multiple discourses and discussions. Enlisting the help of support staff, such as medical assistants and nurses, to fill in available risk parameters in risk assessment tools can save time for providers and increase efficiency, as can technology‐based solutions such as integrating risk assessments into electronic medical records. Modified, abbreviated risk assessment tools can be applied to a patient's clinical scenario when all of a patient's data are not available to complete a more comprehensive assessment. Initial discussions regarding the overall meaning and prognostic importance of risk scores may assist patients to take on a more active role in terms of informed decision‐making regarding their care. A collaborative approach can help clinics establish consistent use of risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9395695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93956952022-08-24 Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations Wilson, Melisa Keeley, Jennifer Kingman, Martha McDevitt, Susanne Brewer, Jacqueline Rogers, Frances Hill, Wendy Rideman, Zachary Broderick, Meredith Pulm Circ Consensus Statement Performing longitudinal and consistent risk assessments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to help guide treatment decisions to achieve early on and maintain a low‐risk status and improve patient morbidity and mortality. Clinical gestalt or expert perception alone may over or underestimate a patient's risk status. Indeed, regular and continued use of validated risk assessment tools more accurately predict patients' survival. Effective PAH risk assessments are often underutilized even though many seasoned clinicians will attest to using these tools routinely. We present recommendations based on real‐world experience in varied clinical practice settings around the United States for overcoming barriers to facilitate regular, serial formal risk assessment. Expert advanced practice provider clinicians from mid to large‐size medical centers collaborated to formulate recommendations based on multiple discourses and discussions. Enlisting the help of support staff, such as medical assistants and nurses, to fill in available risk parameters in risk assessment tools can save time for providers and increase efficiency, as can technology‐based solutions such as integrating risk assessments into electronic medical records. Modified, abbreviated risk assessment tools can be applied to a patient's clinical scenario when all of a patient's data are not available to complete a more comprehensive assessment. Initial discussions regarding the overall meaning and prognostic importance of risk scores may assist patients to take on a more active role in terms of informed decision‐making regarding their care. A collaborative approach can help clinics establish consistent use of risk assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9395695/ /pubmed/36016667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12106 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Consensus Statement
Wilson, Melisa
Keeley, Jennifer
Kingman, Martha
McDevitt, Susanne
Brewer, Jacqueline
Rogers, Frances
Hill, Wendy
Rideman, Zachary
Broderick, Meredith
Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations
title Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations
title_full Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations
title_fullStr Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations
title_short Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations
title_sort clinical application of risk assessment in pah: expert center aprn recommendations
topic Consensus Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12106
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonmelisa clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT keeleyjennifer clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT kingmanmartha clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT mcdevittsusanne clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT brewerjacqueline clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT rogersfrances clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT hillwendy clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT ridemanzachary clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations
AT broderickmeredith clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations