Cargando…
Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations
Performing longitudinal and consistent risk assessments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to help guide treatment decisions to achieve early on and maintain a low‐risk status and improve patient morbidity and mortality. Clinical gestalt or expert perception alone m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12106 |
_version_ | 1784771759424143360 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Melisa Keeley, Jennifer Kingman, Martha McDevitt, Susanne Brewer, Jacqueline Rogers, Frances Hill, Wendy Rideman, Zachary Broderick, Meredith |
author_facet | Wilson, Melisa Keeley, Jennifer Kingman, Martha McDevitt, Susanne Brewer, Jacqueline Rogers, Frances Hill, Wendy Rideman, Zachary Broderick, Meredith |
author_sort | Wilson, Melisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Performing longitudinal and consistent risk assessments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to help guide treatment decisions to achieve early on and maintain a low‐risk status and improve patient morbidity and mortality. Clinical gestalt or expert perception alone may over or underestimate a patient's risk status. Indeed, regular and continued use of validated risk assessment tools more accurately predict patients' survival. Effective PAH risk assessments are often underutilized even though many seasoned clinicians will attest to using these tools routinely. We present recommendations based on real‐world experience in varied clinical practice settings around the United States for overcoming barriers to facilitate regular, serial formal risk assessment. Expert advanced practice provider clinicians from mid to large‐size medical centers collaborated to formulate recommendations based on multiple discourses and discussions. Enlisting the help of support staff, such as medical assistants and nurses, to fill in available risk parameters in risk assessment tools can save time for providers and increase efficiency, as can technology‐based solutions such as integrating risk assessments into electronic medical records. Modified, abbreviated risk assessment tools can be applied to a patient's clinical scenario when all of a patient's data are not available to complete a more comprehensive assessment. Initial discussions regarding the overall meaning and prognostic importance of risk scores may assist patients to take on a more active role in terms of informed decision‐making regarding their care. A collaborative approach can help clinics establish consistent use of risk assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9395695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93956952022-08-24 Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations Wilson, Melisa Keeley, Jennifer Kingman, Martha McDevitt, Susanne Brewer, Jacqueline Rogers, Frances Hill, Wendy Rideman, Zachary Broderick, Meredith Pulm Circ Consensus Statement Performing longitudinal and consistent risk assessments for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is important to help guide treatment decisions to achieve early on and maintain a low‐risk status and improve patient morbidity and mortality. Clinical gestalt or expert perception alone may over or underestimate a patient's risk status. Indeed, regular and continued use of validated risk assessment tools more accurately predict patients' survival. Effective PAH risk assessments are often underutilized even though many seasoned clinicians will attest to using these tools routinely. We present recommendations based on real‐world experience in varied clinical practice settings around the United States for overcoming barriers to facilitate regular, serial formal risk assessment. Expert advanced practice provider clinicians from mid to large‐size medical centers collaborated to formulate recommendations based on multiple discourses and discussions. Enlisting the help of support staff, such as medical assistants and nurses, to fill in available risk parameters in risk assessment tools can save time for providers and increase efficiency, as can technology‐based solutions such as integrating risk assessments into electronic medical records. Modified, abbreviated risk assessment tools can be applied to a patient's clinical scenario when all of a patient's data are not available to complete a more comprehensive assessment. Initial discussions regarding the overall meaning and prognostic importance of risk scores may assist patients to take on a more active role in terms of informed decision‐making regarding their care. A collaborative approach can help clinics establish consistent use of risk assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9395695/ /pubmed/36016667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12106 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Consensus Statement Wilson, Melisa Keeley, Jennifer Kingman, Martha McDevitt, Susanne Brewer, Jacqueline Rogers, Frances Hill, Wendy Rideman, Zachary Broderick, Meredith Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations |
title | Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations |
title_full | Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations |
title_fullStr | Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations |
title_short | Clinical application of risk assessment in PAH: Expert center APRN recommendations |
title_sort | clinical application of risk assessment in pah: expert center aprn recommendations |
topic | Consensus Statement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonmelisa clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT keeleyjennifer clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT kingmanmartha clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT mcdevittsusanne clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT brewerjacqueline clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT rogersfrances clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT hillwendy clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT ridemanzachary clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations AT broderickmeredith clinicalapplicationofriskassessmentinpahexpertcenteraprnrecommendations |