Cargando…
Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review
We systematically reviewed and summarized studies focusing on Bharat Biotech’s Whole Virion Inactivated Corona Virus Antigen BBV152 (Covaxin), which is India’s indigenous response to fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Studies were searched for data on the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety profile...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.863162 |
_version_ | 1784771765904343040 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed, Tousief Irshad Rishi, Saqib Irshad, Summaiya Aggarwal, Jyoti Happa, Karan Mansoor, Sheikh |
author_facet | Ahmed, Tousief Irshad Rishi, Saqib Irshad, Summaiya Aggarwal, Jyoti Happa, Karan Mansoor, Sheikh |
author_sort | Ahmed, Tousief Irshad |
collection | PubMed |
description | We systematically reviewed and summarized studies focusing on Bharat Biotech’s Whole Virion Inactivated Corona Virus Antigen BBV152 (Covaxin), which is India’s indigenous response to fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Studies were searched for data on the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety profile of BBV152. All relevant studies published up to March 22, 2022, were screened from major databases, and 25 studies were eventually inducted into the systematic review. The studies focused on the virus antigen (6 μg) adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide gel and/or Imidazo quinolin gallamide (IMDG), aTLR7/8 agonist. Pre-clinical, phase I, and II clinical trials showed appreciable immunogenicity. Both neutralizing and binding antibody titers were significant and T cell responses were Th1-biased. Phase III trials on the 6 μg +Algel-IMDG formulation showed a 93.4% efficacy against severe COVID-19. Data from the trials revealed an acceptable safety profile with mostly mild-moderate local and systemic adverse events. No serious adverse events or fatalities were seen, and most studies reported milder and lesser adverse events with Covaxin when compared with other vaccines, especially Oxford-Astra Zeneca’s AZD1222 (Covishield). The immunogenicity performance of Covaxin, which provided significant protection only after the second dose, was mediocre and it was consistently surpassed by Covishield. One study reported adjusted effectiveness against symptomatic infection to be just 50% at 2 weeks after the second dose. Nonetheless, appreciable results were seen in previously infected individuals administered both doses. There was some evidence of coverage against the Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants. However, neither Covaxin nor Covishield showed sufficient protection against the Omicron variant. Two studies reported super-additive results on mixing Covaxin with Covishield. Further exploration of heterologous prime-boost vaccination with a combination of an inactivated vaccine and an adenoviral vector-based vaccine for tackling future variants may be beneficial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9395719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93957192022-08-24 Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review Ahmed, Tousief Irshad Rishi, Saqib Irshad, Summaiya Aggarwal, Jyoti Happa, Karan Mansoor, Sheikh Front Immunol Immunology We systematically reviewed and summarized studies focusing on Bharat Biotech’s Whole Virion Inactivated Corona Virus Antigen BBV152 (Covaxin), which is India’s indigenous response to fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Studies were searched for data on the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety profile of BBV152. All relevant studies published up to March 22, 2022, were screened from major databases, and 25 studies were eventually inducted into the systematic review. The studies focused on the virus antigen (6 μg) adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide gel and/or Imidazo quinolin gallamide (IMDG), aTLR7/8 agonist. Pre-clinical, phase I, and II clinical trials showed appreciable immunogenicity. Both neutralizing and binding antibody titers were significant and T cell responses were Th1-biased. Phase III trials on the 6 μg +Algel-IMDG formulation showed a 93.4% efficacy against severe COVID-19. Data from the trials revealed an acceptable safety profile with mostly mild-moderate local and systemic adverse events. No serious adverse events or fatalities were seen, and most studies reported milder and lesser adverse events with Covaxin when compared with other vaccines, especially Oxford-Astra Zeneca’s AZD1222 (Covishield). The immunogenicity performance of Covaxin, which provided significant protection only after the second dose, was mediocre and it was consistently surpassed by Covishield. One study reported adjusted effectiveness against symptomatic infection to be just 50% at 2 weeks after the second dose. Nonetheless, appreciable results were seen in previously infected individuals administered both doses. There was some evidence of coverage against the Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants. However, neither Covaxin nor Covishield showed sufficient protection against the Omicron variant. Two studies reported super-additive results on mixing Covaxin with Covishield. Further exploration of heterologous prime-boost vaccination with a combination of an inactivated vaccine and an adenoviral vector-based vaccine for tackling future variants may be beneficial. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9395719/ /pubmed/36016940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.863162 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ahmed, Rishi, Irshad, Aggarwal, Happa and Mansoor https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Ahmed, Tousief Irshad Rishi, Saqib Irshad, Summaiya Aggarwal, Jyoti Happa, Karan Mansoor, Sheikh Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review |
title | Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review |
title_full | Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review |
title_short | Inactivated vaccine Covaxin/BBV152: A systematic review |
title_sort | inactivated vaccine covaxin/bbv152: a systematic review |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.863162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedtousiefirshad inactivatedvaccinecovaxinbbv152asystematicreview AT rishisaqib inactivatedvaccinecovaxinbbv152asystematicreview AT irshadsummaiya inactivatedvaccinecovaxinbbv152asystematicreview AT aggarwaljyoti inactivatedvaccinecovaxinbbv152asystematicreview AT happakaran inactivatedvaccinecovaxinbbv152asystematicreview AT mansoorsheikh inactivatedvaccinecovaxinbbv152asystematicreview |