Cargando…

Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience

This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of an initial stakeholder engagement experience designed to facilitate knowledge co-production. The engagement experience is part of a collaborative research framework (CRF), which facilitates iterative interactions among diverse r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singletary, Loretta, Koebele, Elizabeth, Evans, William, Copp, Christopher J., Hockaday, Shelby, Rego, Jesse Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36036019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8
_version_ 1784771778904588288
author Singletary, Loretta
Koebele, Elizabeth
Evans, William
Copp, Christopher J.
Hockaday, Shelby
Rego, Jesse Jo
author_facet Singletary, Loretta
Koebele, Elizabeth
Evans, William
Copp, Christopher J.
Hockaday, Shelby
Rego, Jesse Jo
author_sort Singletary, Loretta
collection PubMed
description This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of an initial stakeholder engagement experience designed to facilitate knowledge co-production. The engagement experience is part of a collaborative research framework (CRF), which facilitates iterative interactions among diverse researchers and stakeholders around the topic of enhanced climate resilience. Here, we describe the: (1) need for and development of a CRF as it relates to stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-production; (2) implementation of the initial engagement experience, focused around individual semi-structured interviews, in the context of a snow-dependent, arid river basin where historical water over allocation, climate change, and diversified water uses challenge the basin’s resilience; and (3) formative evaluation of the engagement experience using an online survey to inform the development of more effective engagement practices. Results of the evaluation indicate that, after participating, most stakeholders understand and recognize the importance of research goals, demonstrate positive attitudes toward collaborative research and researchers, view their contribution of knowledge and expertise as critical to research, and perceive researchers as eager to use their expertise. Moreover, stakeholders emphasized various context-specific goals for knowledge co-production, such as finding innovative ways to adapt to increased competition for diminishing water supplies. To achieve these goals, stakeholders suggested researchers learn about their basin, including its water allocation history and agricultural practices. These results highlight the importance of centering stakeholder engagement experiences within a broader CRF and formatively evaluating such experiences to adapt them to achieve research goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9395777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93957772022-08-23 Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience Singletary, Loretta Koebele, Elizabeth Evans, William Copp, Christopher J. Hockaday, Shelby Rego, Jesse Jo Socioecol Pract Res Research Article This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of an initial stakeholder engagement experience designed to facilitate knowledge co-production. The engagement experience is part of a collaborative research framework (CRF), which facilitates iterative interactions among diverse researchers and stakeholders around the topic of enhanced climate resilience. Here, we describe the: (1) need for and development of a CRF as it relates to stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-production; (2) implementation of the initial engagement experience, focused around individual semi-structured interviews, in the context of a snow-dependent, arid river basin where historical water over allocation, climate change, and diversified water uses challenge the basin’s resilience; and (3) formative evaluation of the engagement experience using an online survey to inform the development of more effective engagement practices. Results of the evaluation indicate that, after participating, most stakeholders understand and recognize the importance of research goals, demonstrate positive attitudes toward collaborative research and researchers, view their contribution of knowledge and expertise as critical to research, and perceive researchers as eager to use their expertise. Moreover, stakeholders emphasized various context-specific goals for knowledge co-production, such as finding innovative ways to adapt to increased competition for diminishing water supplies. To achieve these goals, stakeholders suggested researchers learn about their basin, including its water allocation history and agricultural practices. These results highlight the importance of centering stakeholder engagement experiences within a broader CRF and formatively evaluating such experiences to adapt them to achieve research goals. Springer Nature Singapore 2022-08-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9395777/ /pubmed/36036019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Singletary, Loretta
Koebele, Elizabeth
Evans, William
Copp, Christopher J.
Hockaday, Shelby
Rego, Jesse Jo
Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
title Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
title_full Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
title_fullStr Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
title_short Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
title_sort evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36036019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8
work_keys_str_mv AT singletaryloretta evaluatingstakeholderengagementincollaborativeresearchcoproducingknowledgeforclimateresilience
AT koebeleelizabeth evaluatingstakeholderengagementincollaborativeresearchcoproducingknowledgeforclimateresilience
AT evanswilliam evaluatingstakeholderengagementincollaborativeresearchcoproducingknowledgeforclimateresilience
AT coppchristopherj evaluatingstakeholderengagementincollaborativeresearchcoproducingknowledgeforclimateresilience
AT hockadayshelby evaluatingstakeholderengagementincollaborativeresearchcoproducingknowledgeforclimateresilience
AT regojessejo evaluatingstakeholderengagementincollaborativeresearchcoproducingknowledgeforclimateresilience