Cargando…

The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study

BACKGROUND: Mixed Reality technology may provide many advantages over traditional teaching methods. Despite its potential, the technology has yet to be used for the formal assessment of clinical competency. This study sought to collect validity evidence and assess the feasibility of using the HoloLe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minty, Iona, Lawson, Jason, Guha, Payal, Luo, Xun, Malik, Rukhnoor, Cerneviciute, Raminta, Kinross, James, Martin, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3
_version_ 1784771780687167488
author Minty, Iona
Lawson, Jason
Guha, Payal
Luo, Xun
Malik, Rukhnoor
Cerneviciute, Raminta
Kinross, James
Martin, Guy
author_facet Minty, Iona
Lawson, Jason
Guha, Payal
Luo, Xun
Malik, Rukhnoor
Cerneviciute, Raminta
Kinross, James
Martin, Guy
author_sort Minty, Iona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mixed Reality technology may provide many advantages over traditional teaching methods. Despite its potential, the technology has yet to be used for the formal assessment of clinical competency. This study sought to collect validity evidence and assess the feasibility of using the HoloLens 2 mixed reality headset for the conduct and augmentation of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the assessment of undergraduate medical students undertaking OSCEs via HoloLens 2 live (HLL) and recorded (HLR), and gold-standard in-person (IP) methods. An augmented mixed reality scenario was also assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen undergraduate participants completed a total of 65 OSCE stations. Overall inter-modality correlation was 0.81 (p = 0.01), 0.98 (p = 0.01) and 0.82 (p = 0.01) for IP vs. HLL, HLL vs. HLR and IP vs. HLR respectively. Skill based correlations for IP vs. HLR were assessed for history taking (0.82, p = 0.01), clinical examination (0.81, p = 0.01), procedural (0.88, p = 0.01) and clinical skills (0.92, p = 0.01), and assessment of a virtual mixed reality patient (0.74, p = 0.01). The HoloLens device was deemed to be usable and practical (Standard Usability Scale (SUS) score = 51.5), and the technology was thought to deliver greater flexibility and convenience, and have the potential to expand and enhance assessment opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: HoloLens 2 is comparable to traditional in-person examination of undergraduate medical students for both live and recorded assessments, and therefore is a valid and robust method for objectively assessing performance. The technology is in its infancy, and users need to develop confidence in its usability and reliability as an assessment tool. However, the potential to integrate additional functionality including holographic content, automated tracking and data analysis, and to facilitate remote assessment may allow the technology to enhance, expand and standardise examinations across a range of educational contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9395785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93957852022-08-23 The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study Minty, Iona Lawson, Jason Guha, Payal Luo, Xun Malik, Rukhnoor Cerneviciute, Raminta Kinross, James Martin, Guy BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Mixed Reality technology may provide many advantages over traditional teaching methods. Despite its potential, the technology has yet to be used for the formal assessment of clinical competency. This study sought to collect validity evidence and assess the feasibility of using the HoloLens 2 mixed reality headset for the conduct and augmentation of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the assessment of undergraduate medical students undertaking OSCEs via HoloLens 2 live (HLL) and recorded (HLR), and gold-standard in-person (IP) methods. An augmented mixed reality scenario was also assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen undergraduate participants completed a total of 65 OSCE stations. Overall inter-modality correlation was 0.81 (p = 0.01), 0.98 (p = 0.01) and 0.82 (p = 0.01) for IP vs. HLL, HLL vs. HLR and IP vs. HLR respectively. Skill based correlations for IP vs. HLR were assessed for history taking (0.82, p = 0.01), clinical examination (0.81, p = 0.01), procedural (0.88, p = 0.01) and clinical skills (0.92, p = 0.01), and assessment of a virtual mixed reality patient (0.74, p = 0.01). The HoloLens device was deemed to be usable and practical (Standard Usability Scale (SUS) score = 51.5), and the technology was thought to deliver greater flexibility and convenience, and have the potential to expand and enhance assessment opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: HoloLens 2 is comparable to traditional in-person examination of undergraduate medical students for both live and recorded assessments, and therefore is a valid and robust method for objectively assessing performance. The technology is in its infancy, and users need to develop confidence in its usability and reliability as an assessment tool. However, the potential to integrate additional functionality including holographic content, automated tracking and data analysis, and to facilitate remote assessment may allow the technology to enhance, expand and standardise examinations across a range of educational contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3. BioMed Central 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9395785/ /pubmed/35999532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Minty, Iona
Lawson, Jason
Guha, Payal
Luo, Xun
Malik, Rukhnoor
Cerneviciute, Raminta
Kinross, James
Martin, Guy
The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
title The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
title_full The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
title_fullStr The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
title_full_unstemmed The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
title_short The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
title_sort use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mintyiona theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT lawsonjason theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT guhapayal theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT luoxun theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT malikrukhnoor theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT cerneviciuteraminta theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT kinrossjames theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT martinguy theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT mintyiona useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT lawsonjason useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT guhapayal useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT luoxun useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT malikrukhnoor useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT cerneviciuteraminta useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT kinrossjames useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy
AT martinguy useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy