Cargando…
The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study
BACKGROUND: Mixed Reality technology may provide many advantages over traditional teaching methods. Despite its potential, the technology has yet to be used for the formal assessment of clinical competency. This study sought to collect validity evidence and assess the feasibility of using the HoloLe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3 |
_version_ | 1784771780687167488 |
---|---|
author | Minty, Iona Lawson, Jason Guha, Payal Luo, Xun Malik, Rukhnoor Cerneviciute, Raminta Kinross, James Martin, Guy |
author_facet | Minty, Iona Lawson, Jason Guha, Payal Luo, Xun Malik, Rukhnoor Cerneviciute, Raminta Kinross, James Martin, Guy |
author_sort | Minty, Iona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mixed Reality technology may provide many advantages over traditional teaching methods. Despite its potential, the technology has yet to be used for the formal assessment of clinical competency. This study sought to collect validity evidence and assess the feasibility of using the HoloLens 2 mixed reality headset for the conduct and augmentation of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the assessment of undergraduate medical students undertaking OSCEs via HoloLens 2 live (HLL) and recorded (HLR), and gold-standard in-person (IP) methods. An augmented mixed reality scenario was also assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen undergraduate participants completed a total of 65 OSCE stations. Overall inter-modality correlation was 0.81 (p = 0.01), 0.98 (p = 0.01) and 0.82 (p = 0.01) for IP vs. HLL, HLL vs. HLR and IP vs. HLR respectively. Skill based correlations for IP vs. HLR were assessed for history taking (0.82, p = 0.01), clinical examination (0.81, p = 0.01), procedural (0.88, p = 0.01) and clinical skills (0.92, p = 0.01), and assessment of a virtual mixed reality patient (0.74, p = 0.01). The HoloLens device was deemed to be usable and practical (Standard Usability Scale (SUS) score = 51.5), and the technology was thought to deliver greater flexibility and convenience, and have the potential to expand and enhance assessment opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: HoloLens 2 is comparable to traditional in-person examination of undergraduate medical students for both live and recorded assessments, and therefore is a valid and robust method for objectively assessing performance. The technology is in its infancy, and users need to develop confidence in its usability and reliability as an assessment tool. However, the potential to integrate additional functionality including holographic content, automated tracking and data analysis, and to facilitate remote assessment may allow the technology to enhance, expand and standardise examinations across a range of educational contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9395785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93957852022-08-23 The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study Minty, Iona Lawson, Jason Guha, Payal Luo, Xun Malik, Rukhnoor Cerneviciute, Raminta Kinross, James Martin, Guy BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Mixed Reality technology may provide many advantages over traditional teaching methods. Despite its potential, the technology has yet to be used for the formal assessment of clinical competency. This study sought to collect validity evidence and assess the feasibility of using the HoloLens 2 mixed reality headset for the conduct and augmentation of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the assessment of undergraduate medical students undertaking OSCEs via HoloLens 2 live (HLL) and recorded (HLR), and gold-standard in-person (IP) methods. An augmented mixed reality scenario was also assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen undergraduate participants completed a total of 65 OSCE stations. Overall inter-modality correlation was 0.81 (p = 0.01), 0.98 (p = 0.01) and 0.82 (p = 0.01) for IP vs. HLL, HLL vs. HLR and IP vs. HLR respectively. Skill based correlations for IP vs. HLR were assessed for history taking (0.82, p = 0.01), clinical examination (0.81, p = 0.01), procedural (0.88, p = 0.01) and clinical skills (0.92, p = 0.01), and assessment of a virtual mixed reality patient (0.74, p = 0.01). The HoloLens device was deemed to be usable and practical (Standard Usability Scale (SUS) score = 51.5), and the technology was thought to deliver greater flexibility and convenience, and have the potential to expand and enhance assessment opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: HoloLens 2 is comparable to traditional in-person examination of undergraduate medical students for both live and recorded assessments, and therefore is a valid and robust method for objectively assessing performance. The technology is in its infancy, and users need to develop confidence in its usability and reliability as an assessment tool. However, the potential to integrate additional functionality including holographic content, automated tracking and data analysis, and to facilitate remote assessment may allow the technology to enhance, expand and standardise examinations across a range of educational contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3. BioMed Central 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9395785/ /pubmed/35999532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Minty, Iona Lawson, Jason Guha, Payal Luo, Xun Malik, Rukhnoor Cerneviciute, Raminta Kinross, James Martin, Guy The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study |
title | The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study |
title_full | The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study |
title_fullStr | The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study |
title_short | The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study |
title_sort | use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03701-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mintyiona theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT lawsonjason theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT guhapayal theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT luoxun theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT malikrukhnoor theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT cerneviciuteraminta theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT kinrossjames theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT martinguy theuseofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT mintyiona useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT lawsonjason useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT guhapayal useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT luoxun useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT malikrukhnoor useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT cerneviciuteraminta useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT kinrossjames useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy AT martinguy useofmixedrealitytechnologyfortheobjectiveassessmentofclinicalskillsavalidationstudy |