Cargando…

The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading

Individual differences in reading performance between children appear from the onset of literacy acquisition. One possible explanation for this variability is the influence of inhibition in reading ability, a topic that has received very little research attention. Nevertheless, children often make g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Rom, Margot, Szmalec, Arnaud, Van Reybroeck, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10337-8
_version_ 1784771801931317248
author De Rom, Margot
Szmalec, Arnaud
Van Reybroeck, Marie
author_facet De Rom, Margot
Szmalec, Arnaud
Van Reybroeck, Marie
author_sort De Rom, Margot
collection PubMed
description Individual differences in reading performance between children appear from the onset of literacy acquisition. One possible explanation for this variability is the influence of inhibition in reading ability, a topic that has received very little research attention. Nevertheless, children often make guessing errors characterized by replacing a word with an orthographic neighbor, possibly linked to failing inhibition. The present study aims to evaluate the role of inhibition during word and sentence reading and compare its effects in spoken and motor tasks. Participants comprised 25 children in Grades 2 and 3 (M(age) = 8; 2). The children performed five inhibition tasks in reading (words, sentences), spoken (words, sentences) and motor modalities. Within the two reading tasks, inhibition demands were assessed using pairs of orthographic neighbors for which the frequency was manipulated. Accuracy, types of errors, latency, and response times were measured. GLMM analyses demonstrated that children were sensitive to the inhibitory demands of both spoken tasks and of the sentence reading task regarding accuracy, latency, and response times. Indeed, children made more mistakes and were slower when inhibitory demands were augmented. They also made more guessing errors in the word reading task. No such inhibitory effect was found in the motor task. Moreover, correlational analyses revealed that children who showed better inhibitory skills were able to read words and texts more accurately. These findings suggest that children need to utilize inhibitory resources when processing words or sentences and that these inhibitory skills are involved in overall reading ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9395889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93958892022-08-23 The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading De Rom, Margot Szmalec, Arnaud Van Reybroeck, Marie Read Writ Article Individual differences in reading performance between children appear from the onset of literacy acquisition. One possible explanation for this variability is the influence of inhibition in reading ability, a topic that has received very little research attention. Nevertheless, children often make guessing errors characterized by replacing a word with an orthographic neighbor, possibly linked to failing inhibition. The present study aims to evaluate the role of inhibition during word and sentence reading and compare its effects in spoken and motor tasks. Participants comprised 25 children in Grades 2 and 3 (M(age) = 8; 2). The children performed five inhibition tasks in reading (words, sentences), spoken (words, sentences) and motor modalities. Within the two reading tasks, inhibition demands were assessed using pairs of orthographic neighbors for which the frequency was manipulated. Accuracy, types of errors, latency, and response times were measured. GLMM analyses demonstrated that children were sensitive to the inhibitory demands of both spoken tasks and of the sentence reading task regarding accuracy, latency, and response times. Indeed, children made more mistakes and were slower when inhibitory demands were augmented. They also made more guessing errors in the word reading task. No such inhibitory effect was found in the motor task. Moreover, correlational analyses revealed that children who showed better inhibitory skills were able to read words and texts more accurately. These findings suggest that children need to utilize inhibitory resources when processing words or sentences and that these inhibitory skills are involved in overall reading ability. Springer Netherlands 2022-08-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9395889/ /pubmed/36032417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10337-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
De Rom, Margot
Szmalec, Arnaud
Van Reybroeck, Marie
The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading
title The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading
title_full The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading
title_fullStr The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading
title_full_unstemmed The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading
title_short The involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading
title_sort involvement of inhibition in word and sentence reading
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10337-8
work_keys_str_mv AT derommargot theinvolvementofinhibitioninwordandsentencereading
AT szmalecarnaud theinvolvementofinhibitioninwordandsentencereading
AT vanreybroeckmarie theinvolvementofinhibitioninwordandsentencereading
AT derommargot involvementofinhibitioninwordandsentencereading
AT szmalecarnaud involvementofinhibitioninwordandsentencereading
AT vanreybroeckmarie involvementofinhibitioninwordandsentencereading