Cargando…

Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts

BACKGROUND: Paediatric liver transplantation (pLT) is the treatment of choice for many liver conditions. However, it still poses relevant challenges, mainly related to the size of the recipients. Unlike in adults, excessive graft volume might represent an issue when the estimated graft-recipient-wei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavriilidis, Paschalis, Hidalgo, Ernest
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016740
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-20-792
_version_ 1784771851255283712
author Gavriilidis, Paschalis
Hidalgo, Ernest
author_facet Gavriilidis, Paschalis
Hidalgo, Ernest
author_sort Gavriilidis, Paschalis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Paediatric liver transplantation (pLT) is the treatment of choice for many liver conditions. However, it still poses relevant challenges, mainly related to the size of the recipients. Unlike in adults, excessive graft volume might represent an issue when the estimated graft-recipient-weight-ratio (GRWR) is significantly disproportionate. In this situation, the traditional left lateral sector (LLS) grafts are too big and other alternatives are required, such as monosegmental or reduced (including hyper-reduced) grafts (RLLS/HRLLS). Results with conventional LLS-pLT are excellent and replicating them with monosegmental or RLLS is challenging given (I) the technical complexity and (II) the need to overcome the large-for-size scenario. This article is to review the existing experience with monosegmental, RLLS/HRLLS grafts and appraise its results. METHODS: Systematic search of the electronic databases, conducted from their inception until May 2020. RESULTS: After scrutiny of the available literature, 16 studies were included reporting 330 patients transplanted with monosegmental and RLLS/HRLLS grafts. There were 10 re-grafts (6 of them <90 days); 90% of grafts were LDLT. Overall, median recipient’s age and weight were 7 months (range, 5 days–22 months) and 5.8 kg (range, 2.6–8 kg) respectively. Median graft weight was 209 grams (range, 124–264 grams) and median GRWR was 3.5% (range, 2.7–5.6%). Hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis overall incidence were 1.5% and 4.2%; 120 out of the 330 pLT were monosegmental (37%) producing a smaller graft (median of 164 grams) and accordingly a lower GRWR (median 3.2%) compared to reduced LLS. With a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 6–87 months), the overall graft and patient survival were 84% (285/340) and 89% (295/330). DISCUSSION: Monosegmental and RLLS/HRLLS grafts provide access to liver transplantation for very small recipients with excellent results comparable to the standard LLS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93960862022-08-24 Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts Gavriilidis, Paschalis Hidalgo, Ernest Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Review Article BACKGROUND: Paediatric liver transplantation (pLT) is the treatment of choice for many liver conditions. However, it still poses relevant challenges, mainly related to the size of the recipients. Unlike in adults, excessive graft volume might represent an issue when the estimated graft-recipient-weight-ratio (GRWR) is significantly disproportionate. In this situation, the traditional left lateral sector (LLS) grafts are too big and other alternatives are required, such as monosegmental or reduced (including hyper-reduced) grafts (RLLS/HRLLS). Results with conventional LLS-pLT are excellent and replicating them with monosegmental or RLLS is challenging given (I) the technical complexity and (II) the need to overcome the large-for-size scenario. This article is to review the existing experience with monosegmental, RLLS/HRLLS grafts and appraise its results. METHODS: Systematic search of the electronic databases, conducted from their inception until May 2020. RESULTS: After scrutiny of the available literature, 16 studies were included reporting 330 patients transplanted with monosegmental and RLLS/HRLLS grafts. There were 10 re-grafts (6 of them <90 days); 90% of grafts were LDLT. Overall, median recipient’s age and weight were 7 months (range, 5 days–22 months) and 5.8 kg (range, 2.6–8 kg) respectively. Median graft weight was 209 grams (range, 124–264 grams) and median GRWR was 3.5% (range, 2.7–5.6%). Hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis overall incidence were 1.5% and 4.2%; 120 out of the 330 pLT were monosegmental (37%) producing a smaller graft (median of 164 grams) and accordingly a lower GRWR (median 3.2%) compared to reduced LLS. With a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 6–87 months), the overall graft and patient survival were 84% (285/340) and 89% (295/330). DISCUSSION: Monosegmental and RLLS/HRLLS grafts provide access to liver transplantation for very small recipients with excellent results comparable to the standard LLS. AME Publishing Company 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9396086/ /pubmed/36016740 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-20-792 Text en 2022 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Gavriilidis, Paschalis
Hidalgo, Ernest
Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts
title Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts
title_full Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts
title_fullStr Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts
title_full_unstemmed Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts
title_short Alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts
title_sort alternatives to left lateral sector in paediatric liver transplantation—a systematic review on monosegmental and reduced grafts
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016740
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-20-792
work_keys_str_mv AT gavriilidispaschalis alternativestoleftlateralsectorinpaediatriclivertransplantationasystematicreviewonmonosegmentalandreducedgrafts
AT hidalgoernest alternativestoleftlateralsectorinpaediatriclivertransplantationasystematicreviewonmonosegmentalandreducedgrafts