Cargando…

Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample

It is postulated that negative ruminations perpetuate insomnia symptoms by increasing arousal. Less is known about the role of positive rumination. In this study, we set out to test the association between positive and negative ruminations and insomnia symptoms in a non-clinical sample, asking wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hairston, Ilana S., Portal, Lilach, Carmon, Tal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.889810
_version_ 1784771890535989248
author Hairston, Ilana S.
Portal, Lilach
Carmon, Tal
author_facet Hairston, Ilana S.
Portal, Lilach
Carmon, Tal
author_sort Hairston, Ilana S.
collection PubMed
description It is postulated that negative ruminations perpetuate insomnia symptoms by increasing arousal. Less is known about the role of positive rumination. In this study, we set out to test the association between positive and negative ruminations and insomnia symptoms in a non-clinical sample, asking whether reappraisal and suppression moderate the relationship between rumination types and symptoms of insomnia. METHODS: A convenience sample of 354 participants (59% women), ages 18–50, responded to online questionnaires regarding symptoms of insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire that provides separate scales for Reappraisal and Suppression, Negative Rumination (Ruminative Response Scale), Positive Rumination and Dampening (Responses to Positive Affect questionnaire), and general health and demographics. RESULTS: About 30% of respondents had moderate to severe symptoms of insomnia according to the ISI. The primary hypothesis was tested using three moderation models, where rumination type, emotion regulation styles, and interaction terms were predictors, and ISI scores were the outcome variable. Negative rumination positively predicted ISI (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), while the interaction terms with Reappraisal (β = 0.02, p = 0.575) and Suppression (β = 0.07, p = 0.092) were not significant. Dampening also positively predicted ISI (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), with the interaction term with Reappraisal nearly significant (β = −0.09, p = 0.060), but not with Suppression (β = 0.08, p =0.098). Positive rumination negatively predicted ISI (β = −0.12, p = 0.021), this relationship was reversed with emotion regulation factors in the model (β = 0.11, p = 0.094), where the interaction with Reappraisal (β = 0.13, p = 0.020) and Suppression (β = −0.13, p = 0.024) were both significant. DISCUSSION: Positive Rumination weakly and negatively correlated with ISI, but the combination with Reappraisal was associated with more insomnia symptoms. By contrast, Dampening was associated with more insomnia symptoms, with minimal to no moderating effects. These observations are interpreted in the context of the role of emotion regulation strategies and sleep, and their potential clinical implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93962592022-08-24 Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample Hairston, Ilana S. Portal, Lilach Carmon, Tal Front Psychiatry Psychiatry It is postulated that negative ruminations perpetuate insomnia symptoms by increasing arousal. Less is known about the role of positive rumination. In this study, we set out to test the association between positive and negative ruminations and insomnia symptoms in a non-clinical sample, asking whether reappraisal and suppression moderate the relationship between rumination types and symptoms of insomnia. METHODS: A convenience sample of 354 participants (59% women), ages 18–50, responded to online questionnaires regarding symptoms of insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index [ISI]), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire that provides separate scales for Reappraisal and Suppression, Negative Rumination (Ruminative Response Scale), Positive Rumination and Dampening (Responses to Positive Affect questionnaire), and general health and demographics. RESULTS: About 30% of respondents had moderate to severe symptoms of insomnia according to the ISI. The primary hypothesis was tested using three moderation models, where rumination type, emotion regulation styles, and interaction terms were predictors, and ISI scores were the outcome variable. Negative rumination positively predicted ISI (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), while the interaction terms with Reappraisal (β = 0.02, p = 0.575) and Suppression (β = 0.07, p = 0.092) were not significant. Dampening also positively predicted ISI (β = 0.56, p < 0.001), with the interaction term with Reappraisal nearly significant (β = −0.09, p = 0.060), but not with Suppression (β = 0.08, p =0.098). Positive rumination negatively predicted ISI (β = −0.12, p = 0.021), this relationship was reversed with emotion regulation factors in the model (β = 0.11, p = 0.094), where the interaction with Reappraisal (β = 0.13, p = 0.020) and Suppression (β = −0.13, p = 0.024) were both significant. DISCUSSION: Positive Rumination weakly and negatively correlated with ISI, but the combination with Reappraisal was associated with more insomnia symptoms. By contrast, Dampening was associated with more insomnia symptoms, with minimal to no moderating effects. These observations are interpreted in the context of the role of emotion regulation strategies and sleep, and their potential clinical implications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9396259/ /pubmed/36016976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.889810 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hairston, Portal and Carmon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Hairston, Ilana S.
Portal, Lilach
Carmon, Tal
Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample
title Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample
title_full Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample
title_fullStr Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample
title_full_unstemmed Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample
title_short Positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: A study in a non-clinical sample
title_sort positive rumination can (also) interfere with sleep: a study in a non-clinical sample
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.889810
work_keys_str_mv AT hairstonilanas positiveruminationcanalsointerferewithsleepastudyinanonclinicalsample
AT portallilach positiveruminationcanalsointerferewithsleepastudyinanonclinicalsample
AT carmontal positiveruminationcanalsointerferewithsleepastudyinanonclinicalsample