Cargando…

Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Individuals of all ages and with all degrees of severity of the coronavirus disease (COVID) can suffer from persisting or reappearing symptoms called long COVID. Long COVID involves various symptoms, such as shortness of breath, fatigue, or organ damage. The growing number of long COVID...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolf, Sarah, Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid, Erdös, Judit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08384-6
_version_ 1784771957014659072
author Wolf, Sarah
Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid
Erdös, Judit
author_facet Wolf, Sarah
Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid
Erdös, Judit
author_sort Wolf, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals of all ages and with all degrees of severity of the coronavirus disease (COVID) can suffer from persisting or reappearing symptoms called long COVID. Long COVID involves various symptoms, such as shortness of breath, fatigue, or organ damage. The growing number of long COVID cases places a burden on the patients and the broader economy and, hence, has gained more weight in political decisions. This scoping review aimed to give an overview of recommendations about possible long COVID healthcare pathways and requirements regarding decision-making and communication for healthcare professionals. METHODS: A systematic search in four databases and biweekly update-hand searches were conducted. In addition to guidelines and reviews, expert opinions in consensus statements or clinical perspectives were also considered. Data were systematically extracted and subsequently narratively and graphically summarised. RESULTS: Fourteen references, five guidelines, four reviews, one consensus paper, and four clinical perspectives were included. The evidence recommended that most long COVID-related healthcare should be in primary care. Patients with complex symptoms should be referred to specialized long COVID outpatient assessment clinics. In contrast, patients with one dominant symptom should be directed to the respective specialist for a second assessment. Depending on the patients’ needs, further referral options include, e.g. rehabilitation or non-medical health services. Self-management and good communication between healthcare professionals and patients are crucial aspects of the long COVID management recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the included guidelines and reviews is limited in the methods applied due to the novelty of this topic and the associated urgency for research. Hence, an update review with more rigorous data is recommended. Furthermore, the systematic collection of real-world data on long COVID surveillance needs to be set up soon to gather further information on the duration and severity of long COVID and thereby facilitate long COVID care planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93965752022-08-23 Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review Wolf, Sarah Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid Erdös, Judit BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Individuals of all ages and with all degrees of severity of the coronavirus disease (COVID) can suffer from persisting or reappearing symptoms called long COVID. Long COVID involves various symptoms, such as shortness of breath, fatigue, or organ damage. The growing number of long COVID cases places a burden on the patients and the broader economy and, hence, has gained more weight in political decisions. This scoping review aimed to give an overview of recommendations about possible long COVID healthcare pathways and requirements regarding decision-making and communication for healthcare professionals. METHODS: A systematic search in four databases and biweekly update-hand searches were conducted. In addition to guidelines and reviews, expert opinions in consensus statements or clinical perspectives were also considered. Data were systematically extracted and subsequently narratively and graphically summarised. RESULTS: Fourteen references, five guidelines, four reviews, one consensus paper, and four clinical perspectives were included. The evidence recommended that most long COVID-related healthcare should be in primary care. Patients with complex symptoms should be referred to specialized long COVID outpatient assessment clinics. In contrast, patients with one dominant symptom should be directed to the respective specialist for a second assessment. Depending on the patients’ needs, further referral options include, e.g. rehabilitation or non-medical health services. Self-management and good communication between healthcare professionals and patients are crucial aspects of the long COVID management recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the included guidelines and reviews is limited in the methods applied due to the novelty of this topic and the associated urgency for research. Hence, an update review with more rigorous data is recommended. Furthermore, the systematic collection of real-world data on long COVID surveillance needs to be set up soon to gather further information on the duration and severity of long COVID and thereby facilitate long COVID care planning. BioMed Central 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9396575/ /pubmed/35999605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08384-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wolf, Sarah
Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid
Erdös, Judit
Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review
title Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review
title_full Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review
title_fullStr Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review
title_short Possible long COVID healthcare pathways: a scoping review
title_sort possible long covid healthcare pathways: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08384-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfsarah possiblelongcovidhealthcarepathwaysascopingreview
AT zechmeisterkossingrid possiblelongcovidhealthcarepathwaysascopingreview
AT erdosjudit possiblelongcovidhealthcarepathwaysascopingreview