Cargando…

Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer

OBJECTIVE: Among patients with cancer, malnutrition remains common and is a key challenge in oncology practice today. A prior study from our group revealed that malnourished cancer inpatients who got nutritional treatment (intervention group) had lower mortality and improved functional and quality o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuetz, Philipp, Sulo, Suela, Walzer, Stefan, Krenberger, Sebastian, Brunton, Cory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916073
_version_ 1784771989690384384
author Schuetz, Philipp
Sulo, Suela
Walzer, Stefan
Krenberger, Sebastian
Brunton, Cory
author_facet Schuetz, Philipp
Sulo, Suela
Walzer, Stefan
Krenberger, Sebastian
Brunton, Cory
author_sort Schuetz, Philipp
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Among patients with cancer, malnutrition remains common and is a key challenge in oncology practice today. A prior study from our group revealed that malnourished cancer inpatients who got nutritional treatment (intervention group) had lower mortality and improved functional and quality of life outcomes compared to inpatients without nutritional support (control group). Our present analysis aimed to determine whether the improved patient recovery by nutritional support was paralleled by cost-effectiveness of this nutritional care. METHODS: We analyzed hospital costs and health outcomes in patients with cancer, using a Markov simulation model with daily cycles to analyze the economic impact of nutritional support in malnourished inpatients with malignancies. We compared results for a nutritional intervention group and a control group across a 30-day timeframe. Five health states were designated (malnourished but stable, complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, discharge, death). Costs for the different health states were based on publicly available data for the Swiss medical system. Total patient cost categories included in-hospital nutrition, days spent in the normal ward, days in the ICU, and medical complications. RESULTS: Total per-patient costs for in-hospital supportive nutrition was Swiss francs (CHF) 129. Across a 30-day post-admission interval, our model determined average overall costs of care of CHF 46,420 per-patient in the intervention group versus CHF 43,711 in the control group—a difference of CHF 2,709 per patient. Modeled results showed a cost of CHF 1,788 to prevent one major complication, CHF 4,464 to prevent one day in the ICU, and CHF 3,345 to prevent one death. Recovery benefits of nutritional care were thus paralleled by cost-effectiveness of this care. CONCLUSION: In-hospital nutritional support for oncology patients at nutritional risk is a low-cost intervention that has both clinical and financial benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93967382022-08-24 Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer Schuetz, Philipp Sulo, Suela Walzer, Stefan Krenberger, Sebastian Brunton, Cory Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: Among patients with cancer, malnutrition remains common and is a key challenge in oncology practice today. A prior study from our group revealed that malnourished cancer inpatients who got nutritional treatment (intervention group) had lower mortality and improved functional and quality of life outcomes compared to inpatients without nutritional support (control group). Our present analysis aimed to determine whether the improved patient recovery by nutritional support was paralleled by cost-effectiveness of this nutritional care. METHODS: We analyzed hospital costs and health outcomes in patients with cancer, using a Markov simulation model with daily cycles to analyze the economic impact of nutritional support in malnourished inpatients with malignancies. We compared results for a nutritional intervention group and a control group across a 30-day timeframe. Five health states were designated (malnourished but stable, complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, discharge, death). Costs for the different health states were based on publicly available data for the Swiss medical system. Total patient cost categories included in-hospital nutrition, days spent in the normal ward, days in the ICU, and medical complications. RESULTS: Total per-patient costs for in-hospital supportive nutrition was Swiss francs (CHF) 129. Across a 30-day post-admission interval, our model determined average overall costs of care of CHF 46,420 per-patient in the intervention group versus CHF 43,711 in the control group—a difference of CHF 2,709 per patient. Modeled results showed a cost of CHF 1,788 to prevent one major complication, CHF 4,464 to prevent one day in the ICU, and CHF 3,345 to prevent one death. Recovery benefits of nutritional care were thus paralleled by cost-effectiveness of this care. CONCLUSION: In-hospital nutritional support for oncology patients at nutritional risk is a low-cost intervention that has both clinical and financial benefits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9396738/ /pubmed/36016618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916073 Text en Copyright © 2022 Schuetz, Sulo, Walzer, Krenberger and Brunton https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Schuetz, Philipp
Sulo, Suela
Walzer, Stefan
Krenberger, Sebastian
Brunton, Cory
Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer
title Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer
title_full Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer
title_fullStr Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer
title_short Nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer
title_sort nutritional support during the hospital stay is cost-effective for preventing adverse outcomes in patients with cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916073
work_keys_str_mv AT schuetzphilipp nutritionalsupportduringthehospitalstayiscosteffectiveforpreventingadverseoutcomesinpatientswithcancer
AT sulosuela nutritionalsupportduringthehospitalstayiscosteffectiveforpreventingadverseoutcomesinpatientswithcancer
AT walzerstefan nutritionalsupportduringthehospitalstayiscosteffectiveforpreventingadverseoutcomesinpatientswithcancer
AT krenbergersebastian nutritionalsupportduringthehospitalstayiscosteffectiveforpreventingadverseoutcomesinpatientswithcancer
AT bruntoncory nutritionalsupportduringthehospitalstayiscosteffectiveforpreventingadverseoutcomesinpatientswithcancer