Cargando…

Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study

BACKGROUND: Maintaining a constant driving pressure during a prolonged sigh breath lung recruitment manoeuvre (LRM) from 20 to 45 cmH(2)0 peak inspiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients has been shown to be a functional test to predict fluid responsiveness (FR) when using a linear regr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desebbe, Olivier, Mondor, Whitney, Gergele, Laurent, Raphael, Darren, Vallier, Sylvain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01815-1
_version_ 1784771992234229760
author Desebbe, Olivier
Mondor, Whitney
Gergele, Laurent
Raphael, Darren
Vallier, Sylvain
author_facet Desebbe, Olivier
Mondor, Whitney
Gergele, Laurent
Raphael, Darren
Vallier, Sylvain
author_sort Desebbe, Olivier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maintaining a constant driving pressure during a prolonged sigh breath lung recruitment manoeuvre (LRM) from 20 to 45 cmH(2)0 peak inspiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients has been shown to be a functional test to predict fluid responsiveness (FR) when using a linear regression model of hemodynamic parameters, such as central venous pressure (CVP) and pulse pressure (PP). However, two important limitations have been raised, the use of high ventilation pressures and a regression slope calculation that is difficult to apply at bedside. This ancillary study aimed to reanalyse absolute variations of CVP (ΔCVP) and PP (ΔPP) values at lower stages of the LRM, (40, 35, and 30 cm H(2)0 of peak inspiratory pressure) for their ability to predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective study data set in 18 mechanically ventilated patients, in an intensive care unit. CVP, systemic arterial pressure parameters and stroke volume (SV) were recorded during prolonged LRM followed by a 500 mL crystalloid volume expansion. Patients were considered as fluid responders if SV increased more than 10%. Receiver-operating curves (ROC) analysis with the corresponding grey zone approach were performed. RESULTS: Areas under the ROC to predict fluid responsiveness for ΔCVP and ΔPP were not different between the successive stepwise increase of inspiratory pressures [0.88 and 0.89 for ΔCVP at 45 and 30 cm H(2)0 (P = 0.89), respectively, and 0.92 and 0.95 for ΔPP at 45 and 30 cm H(2)0, respectively (P = 0.51)]. Using a maximum of 30 cmH(2)O inspiratory pressure during the LRM, ΔCVP and ΔPP had a threshold value to predict fluid responsiveness of 2 mmHg and 4 mmHg, with sensitivities of 89% and 89% and specificities of 67% and 89%, respectively. Combining ΔPP and ΔCVP decreased the proportion of the patients in the grey zone from 28 to 11% and showed a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 83%. CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise PEEP elevation recruitment manoeuvre of up to 30 cm H(2)0 may predict fluid responsiveness as well as 45 cm H(2)0. The combination of ΔPP and ΔCVP optimizes the categorization of responder and non-responder patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01815-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93967582022-08-24 Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study Desebbe, Olivier Mondor, Whitney Gergele, Laurent Raphael, Darren Vallier, Sylvain BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Maintaining a constant driving pressure during a prolonged sigh breath lung recruitment manoeuvre (LRM) from 20 to 45 cmH(2)0 peak inspiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients has been shown to be a functional test to predict fluid responsiveness (FR) when using a linear regression model of hemodynamic parameters, such as central venous pressure (CVP) and pulse pressure (PP). However, two important limitations have been raised, the use of high ventilation pressures and a regression slope calculation that is difficult to apply at bedside. This ancillary study aimed to reanalyse absolute variations of CVP (ΔCVP) and PP (ΔPP) values at lower stages of the LRM, (40, 35, and 30 cm H(2)0 of peak inspiratory pressure) for their ability to predict fluid responsiveness. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective study data set in 18 mechanically ventilated patients, in an intensive care unit. CVP, systemic arterial pressure parameters and stroke volume (SV) were recorded during prolonged LRM followed by a 500 mL crystalloid volume expansion. Patients were considered as fluid responders if SV increased more than 10%. Receiver-operating curves (ROC) analysis with the corresponding grey zone approach were performed. RESULTS: Areas under the ROC to predict fluid responsiveness for ΔCVP and ΔPP were not different between the successive stepwise increase of inspiratory pressures [0.88 and 0.89 for ΔCVP at 45 and 30 cm H(2)0 (P = 0.89), respectively, and 0.92 and 0.95 for ΔPP at 45 and 30 cm H(2)0, respectively (P = 0.51)]. Using a maximum of 30 cmH(2)O inspiratory pressure during the LRM, ΔCVP and ΔPP had a threshold value to predict fluid responsiveness of 2 mmHg and 4 mmHg, with sensitivities of 89% and 89% and specificities of 67% and 89%, respectively. Combining ΔPP and ΔCVP decreased the proportion of the patients in the grey zone from 28 to 11% and showed a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 83%. CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise PEEP elevation recruitment manoeuvre of up to 30 cm H(2)0 may predict fluid responsiveness as well as 45 cm H(2)0. The combination of ΔPP and ΔCVP optimizes the categorization of responder and non-responder patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01815-1. BioMed Central 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9396758/ /pubmed/35999508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01815-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Desebbe, Olivier
Mondor, Whitney
Gergele, Laurent
Raphael, Darren
Vallier, Sylvain
Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study
title Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study
title_full Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study
title_fullStr Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study
title_full_unstemmed Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study
title_short Variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study
title_sort variations of pulse pressure and central venous pressure may predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during lung recruitment manoeuvre: an ancillary study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01815-1
work_keys_str_mv AT desebbeolivier variationsofpulsepressureandcentralvenouspressuremaypredictfluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsduringlungrecruitmentmanoeuvreanancillarystudy
AT mondorwhitney variationsofpulsepressureandcentralvenouspressuremaypredictfluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsduringlungrecruitmentmanoeuvreanancillarystudy
AT gergelelaurent variationsofpulsepressureandcentralvenouspressuremaypredictfluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsduringlungrecruitmentmanoeuvreanancillarystudy
AT raphaeldarren variationsofpulsepressureandcentralvenouspressuremaypredictfluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsduringlungrecruitmentmanoeuvreanancillarystudy
AT valliersylvain variationsofpulsepressureandcentralvenouspressuremaypredictfluidresponsivenessinmechanicallyventilatedpatientsduringlungrecruitmentmanoeuvreanancillarystudy