Cargando…

Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

BACKGROUND: Depression affects an individual’s physical health and mental well-being and, in pregnant and postpartum women, has specific adverse short- and long-term effects on maternal, child, and family health. The aim of these two systematic reviews is to identify evidence on the benefits and har...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck, Andrew, Hamel, Candyce, Thuku, Micere, Esmaeilisaraji, Leila, Bennett, Alexandria, Shaver, Nicole, Skidmore, Becky, Colman, Ian, Grigoriadis, Sophie, Nicholls, Stuart Gordon, Potter, Beth K., Ritchie, Kerri, Vasa, Priya, Shea, Beverley J., Moher, David, Little, Julian, Stevens, Adrienne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02022-2
_version_ 1784772005286903808
author Beck, Andrew
Hamel, Candyce
Thuku, Micere
Esmaeilisaraji, Leila
Bennett, Alexandria
Shaver, Nicole
Skidmore, Becky
Colman, Ian
Grigoriadis, Sophie
Nicholls, Stuart Gordon
Potter, Beth K.
Ritchie, Kerri
Vasa, Priya
Shea, Beverley J.
Moher, David
Little, Julian
Stevens, Adrienne
author_facet Beck, Andrew
Hamel, Candyce
Thuku, Micere
Esmaeilisaraji, Leila
Bennett, Alexandria
Shaver, Nicole
Skidmore, Becky
Colman, Ian
Grigoriadis, Sophie
Nicholls, Stuart Gordon
Potter, Beth K.
Ritchie, Kerri
Vasa, Priya
Shea, Beverley J.
Moher, David
Little, Julian
Stevens, Adrienne
author_sort Beck, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Depression affects an individual’s physical health and mental well-being and, in pregnant and postpartum women, has specific adverse short- and long-term effects on maternal, child, and family health. The aim of these two systematic reviews is to identify evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for depression compared to no screening in the general adult and pregnant and postpartum populations in primary care or non-mental health clinic settings. These reviews will inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library using a randomized controlled trial filter, where applicable, October 4, 2018, and updated to May 11, 2020. We also searched for gray literature (e.g., websites of organizations of health professionals and patients). Study selection for depression screening trials was performed first on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening. Data extraction, assessment of the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation were performed by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. RESULTS: A total of three trials were included. All three trials were included in the general adult review, while one of the three trials was included in the pregnant and postpartum review. We did not pool results due to substantial differences between studies and high risk of bias. In the general adult review, the first trial (n = 1001) evaluated whether screening for depression in adults with acute coronary syndrome compared to usual care improves health-related quality of life, depression symptoms, or harms of screening at 6, 12, and 18 months. There were little to no differences between the groups at 18 months for the outcomes. The second trial included adults (n = 1412) undergoing initial consultation for osteoarthritis, evaluated for depression and general health (mental and physical) after initial consultation and at 3, 6, and 12 months. The physical component score was statistically significantly lower (worse health) in the screened group at 6 months; however, this difference was not significant at 3 or at 12 months. There were no clinically important or statistically significant differences for other outcomes between groups at any time. The third trial (included in both reviews) reported on 462 postpartum women. At 6 months postpartum, fewer women in the screening group were identified as possibly depressed compared to the control group (RR 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.89) and mean EPDS scores were also statistically significantly lower in the screened group (standardized mean difference 0.34 lower (95% CI 0.15 to 0.52 lower)). All other outcomes did not differ between groups at follow-up. There were serious concerns about the cut-offs used for the questionnaire used to screen, diagnostic confirmation, selective outcome reporting, and the reported magnitude of effects. DISCUSSION: There are limitations of the evidence included in the reviews. There was moderate certainty in the evidence from one trial that screening for depression in the general adult population in primary care or non-mental health clinic settings likely results in little to no difference on reported outcomes; however, the evidence was uncertain from the other two included trials. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of screening for depression in pregnant or postpartum women in primary care or non-mental health clinic settings. Well-conducted and better-reported trials are needed that meet the screening trial criteria used in this review. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Both protocols have been registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [adult: CRD42018099690; pregnancy and postpartum: CRD42018099689] and published (https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13643-018-0930-3). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02022-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93968282022-08-24 Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Beck, Andrew Hamel, Candyce Thuku, Micere Esmaeilisaraji, Leila Bennett, Alexandria Shaver, Nicole Skidmore, Becky Colman, Ian Grigoriadis, Sophie Nicholls, Stuart Gordon Potter, Beth K. Ritchie, Kerri Vasa, Priya Shea, Beverley J. Moher, David Little, Julian Stevens, Adrienne Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Depression affects an individual’s physical health and mental well-being and, in pregnant and postpartum women, has specific adverse short- and long-term effects on maternal, child, and family health. The aim of these two systematic reviews is to identify evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for depression compared to no screening in the general adult and pregnant and postpartum populations in primary care or non-mental health clinic settings. These reviews will inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library using a randomized controlled trial filter, where applicable, October 4, 2018, and updated to May 11, 2020. We also searched for gray literature (e.g., websites of organizations of health professionals and patients). Study selection for depression screening trials was performed first on title and abstract, followed by full-text screening. Data extraction, assessment of the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and application of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation were performed by one reviewer and validated by a second reviewer. RESULTS: A total of three trials were included. All three trials were included in the general adult review, while one of the three trials was included in the pregnant and postpartum review. We did not pool results due to substantial differences between studies and high risk of bias. In the general adult review, the first trial (n = 1001) evaluated whether screening for depression in adults with acute coronary syndrome compared to usual care improves health-related quality of life, depression symptoms, or harms of screening at 6, 12, and 18 months. There were little to no differences between the groups at 18 months for the outcomes. The second trial included adults (n = 1412) undergoing initial consultation for osteoarthritis, evaluated for depression and general health (mental and physical) after initial consultation and at 3, 6, and 12 months. The physical component score was statistically significantly lower (worse health) in the screened group at 6 months; however, this difference was not significant at 3 or at 12 months. There were no clinically important or statistically significant differences for other outcomes between groups at any time. The third trial (included in both reviews) reported on 462 postpartum women. At 6 months postpartum, fewer women in the screening group were identified as possibly depressed compared to the control group (RR 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.89) and mean EPDS scores were also statistically significantly lower in the screened group (standardized mean difference 0.34 lower (95% CI 0.15 to 0.52 lower)). All other outcomes did not differ between groups at follow-up. There were serious concerns about the cut-offs used for the questionnaire used to screen, diagnostic confirmation, selective outcome reporting, and the reported magnitude of effects. DISCUSSION: There are limitations of the evidence included in the reviews. There was moderate certainty in the evidence from one trial that screening for depression in the general adult population in primary care or non-mental health clinic settings likely results in little to no difference on reported outcomes; however, the evidence was uncertain from the other two included trials. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of screening for depression in pregnant or postpartum women in primary care or non-mental health clinic settings. Well-conducted and better-reported trials are needed that meet the screening trial criteria used in this review. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Both protocols have been registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [adult: CRD42018099690; pregnancy and postpartum: CRD42018099689] and published (https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13643-018-0930-3). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-02022-2. BioMed Central 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9396828/ /pubmed/35996176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02022-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Beck, Andrew
Hamel, Candyce
Thuku, Micere
Esmaeilisaraji, Leila
Bennett, Alexandria
Shaver, Nicole
Skidmore, Becky
Colman, Ian
Grigoriadis, Sophie
Nicholls, Stuart Gordon
Potter, Beth K.
Ritchie, Kerri
Vasa, Priya
Shea, Beverley J.
Moher, David
Little, Julian
Stevens, Adrienne
Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
title Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
title_full Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
title_fullStr Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
title_full_unstemmed Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
title_short Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
title_sort screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the canadian task force on preventive health care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35996176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02022-2
work_keys_str_mv AT beckandrew screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT hamelcandyce screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT thukumicere screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT esmaeilisarajileila screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT bennettalexandria screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT shavernicole screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT skidmorebecky screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT colmanian screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT grigoriadissophie screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT nichollsstuartgordon screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT potterbethk screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT ritchiekerri screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT vasapriya screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT sheabeverleyj screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT moherdavid screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT littlejulian screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare
AT stevensadrienne screeningfordepressionamongthegeneraladultpopulationandinwomenduringpregnancyorthefirstyearpostpartumtwosystematicreviewstoinformaguidelineofthecanadiantaskforceonpreventivehealthcare