Cargando…

Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models

BACKGROUND: Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is one of the most important computational tools employed in drug discovery and development. The external validation of QSAR models is the main point to check the reliability of developed models for the prediction activity of n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shayanfar, Shadi, Shayanfar, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00856-4
_version_ 1784772007812923392
author Shayanfar, Shadi
Shayanfar, Ali
author_facet Shayanfar, Shadi
Shayanfar, Ali
author_sort Shayanfar, Shadi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is one of the most important computational tools employed in drug discovery and development. The external validation of QSAR models is the main point to check the reliability of developed models for the prediction activity of not yet synthesized compounds. It was performed by different criteria in the literature. METHODS: In this study, 44 reported QSAR models for biologically active compounds reported in scientific papers were collected. Various statistical parameters of external validation of a QSAR model were calculated, and the results were discussed. RESULTS: The findings revealed that employing the coefficient of determination (r(2)) alone could not indicate the validity of a QSAR model. The established criteria for external validation have some advantages and disadvantages which should be considered in QSAR studies. CONCLUSION: This study showed that these methods alone are not only enough to indicate the validity/invalidity of a QSAR model. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13065-022-00856-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93968392022-08-24 Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models Shayanfar, Shadi Shayanfar, Ali BMC Chem Research BACKGROUND: Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is one of the most important computational tools employed in drug discovery and development. The external validation of QSAR models is the main point to check the reliability of developed models for the prediction activity of not yet synthesized compounds. It was performed by different criteria in the literature. METHODS: In this study, 44 reported QSAR models for biologically active compounds reported in scientific papers were collected. Various statistical parameters of external validation of a QSAR model were calculated, and the results were discussed. RESULTS: The findings revealed that employing the coefficient of determination (r(2)) alone could not indicate the validity of a QSAR model. The established criteria for external validation have some advantages and disadvantages which should be considered in QSAR studies. CONCLUSION: This study showed that these methods alone are not only enough to indicate the validity/invalidity of a QSAR model. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13065-022-00856-4. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9396839/ /pubmed/35999611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00856-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shayanfar, Shadi
Shayanfar, Ali
Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models
title Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models
title_full Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models
title_fullStr Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models
title_short Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models
title_sort comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of qsar models
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00856-4
work_keys_str_mv AT shayanfarshadi comparisonofvariousmethodsforvalidityevaluationofqsarmodels
AT shayanfarali comparisonofvariousmethodsforvalidityevaluationofqsarmodels