Cargando…
Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization?
BACKGROUND: Many studies that collect maternal and neonatal outcomes rely on patient self-report phone calls. It is unclear how reliable or accurate these phone call reports are. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of telephone calls in information collection in IVF. STUDY DESIGN: The women were...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01001-5 |
_version_ | 1784772010267639808 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Ling Xu, Jian Liang, Pei-Ling Liu, Chun-Lin |
author_facet | Sun, Ling Xu, Jian Liang, Pei-Ling Liu, Chun-Lin |
author_sort | Sun, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many studies that collect maternal and neonatal outcomes rely on patient self-report phone calls. It is unclear how reliable or accurate these phone call reports are. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of telephone calls in information collection in IVF. STUDY DESIGN: The women were interviewed seven days after delivery by a nurse via telephone. The maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded based on a self-report from one of the spouses. Meanwhile, the standardized electronic hospitalized discharge records were extracted from the hospital medical database. For each case, maternal and neonatal information obtained from telephone interviews and extracted from medical files were compared. RESULTS: Agreement was classified as “almost perfect, K = 0.81–1.00” for preterm birth, cesarean delivery, low birth weight baby, and macrosomia. The strength of agreement was classified as “moderate, K = 0.41–0.60” for some antepartum complications: gestational diabetes (K = 0.569); pregnancy-induced hypertension (K = 0.588); intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (K = 0.597) and oligohydramnios (K = 0.432). The strength of agreement between telephone interviews and hospitalized discharge records can be classified as “slight (K = 0–0.20)” for some complications: thyroid diseases (K = 0.137), anemia (K = 0.047), postpartum hemorrhage (K = 0.016), and Fetal distress (K = 0.106). CONCLUSION: Some variables (preterm birth, cesarean delivery, birth weight) information collected by telephone follow-up were reliable. However, other complications (thyroid diseases, anemia, postpartum hemorrhage, and fetal distress) collected via self-report was non-reliable. Compared with complications during labor, antepartum complications have higher agreement between different follow-up methods. IVF records and hospitalized discharge records should be matched and collected simultaneously when discussing maternal and neonatal outcomes of IVF. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01001-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9396850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93968502022-08-24 Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? Sun, Ling Xu, Jian Liang, Pei-Ling Liu, Chun-Lin Reprod Biol Endocrinol Hypothesis BACKGROUND: Many studies that collect maternal and neonatal outcomes rely on patient self-report phone calls. It is unclear how reliable or accurate these phone call reports are. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of telephone calls in information collection in IVF. STUDY DESIGN: The women were interviewed seven days after delivery by a nurse via telephone. The maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded based on a self-report from one of the spouses. Meanwhile, the standardized electronic hospitalized discharge records were extracted from the hospital medical database. For each case, maternal and neonatal information obtained from telephone interviews and extracted from medical files were compared. RESULTS: Agreement was classified as “almost perfect, K = 0.81–1.00” for preterm birth, cesarean delivery, low birth weight baby, and macrosomia. The strength of agreement was classified as “moderate, K = 0.41–0.60” for some antepartum complications: gestational diabetes (K = 0.569); pregnancy-induced hypertension (K = 0.588); intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (K = 0.597) and oligohydramnios (K = 0.432). The strength of agreement between telephone interviews and hospitalized discharge records can be classified as “slight (K = 0–0.20)” for some complications: thyroid diseases (K = 0.137), anemia (K = 0.047), postpartum hemorrhage (K = 0.016), and Fetal distress (K = 0.106). CONCLUSION: Some variables (preterm birth, cesarean delivery, birth weight) information collected by telephone follow-up were reliable. However, other complications (thyroid diseases, anemia, postpartum hemorrhage, and fetal distress) collected via self-report was non-reliable. Compared with complications during labor, antepartum complications have higher agreement between different follow-up methods. IVF records and hospitalized discharge records should be matched and collected simultaneously when discussing maternal and neonatal outcomes of IVF. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-022-01001-5. BioMed Central 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9396850/ /pubmed/35999609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01001-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Hypothesis Sun, Ling Xu, Jian Liang, Pei-Ling Liu, Chun-Lin Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? |
title | Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? |
title_full | Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? |
title_fullStr | Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? |
title_short | Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? |
title_sort | is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization? |
topic | Hypothesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-01001-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunling istelephonefollowupreliableinmaternalandneonataloutcomessurveysininvitrofertilization AT xujian istelephonefollowupreliableinmaternalandneonataloutcomessurveysininvitrofertilization AT liangpeiling istelephonefollowupreliableinmaternalandneonataloutcomessurveysininvitrofertilization AT liuchunlin istelephonefollowupreliableinmaternalandneonataloutcomessurveysininvitrofertilization |