Cargando…

Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Objective: To evaluate the impact of using transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TSCSTSCS) on upper and lower extremity function in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective case series. Setting: SCI specific rehabilitation hospital. Participants: A convenie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tefertiller, Candace, Rozwod, Meghan, VandeGriend, Eric, Bartelt, Patricia, Sevigny, Mitch, Smith, Andrew C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.740307
_version_ 1784772025560072192
author Tefertiller, Candace
Rozwod, Meghan
VandeGriend, Eric
Bartelt, Patricia
Sevigny, Mitch
Smith, Andrew C.
author_facet Tefertiller, Candace
Rozwod, Meghan
VandeGriend, Eric
Bartelt, Patricia
Sevigny, Mitch
Smith, Andrew C.
author_sort Tefertiller, Candace
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the impact of using transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TSCSTSCS) on upper and lower extremity function in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective case series. Setting: SCI specific rehabilitation hospital. Participants: A convenience sample (N = 7) of individuals with tetraplegia who had previously been discharged from outpatient therapy due to a plateau in progress. Interventions: Individuals participated in 60 min of upper extremity (UE) functional task-specific practice (FTP) in combination with TSCS and 60 min of locomotor training in combination with TSCS 5x/week. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome for this analysis was the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T). Secondary outcomes include UE motor score (UEMS), LE motor score (LEMS), sensation (light touch and pin prick), Nine-Hole Peg Test, 10 meter walk test, 6 min walk test, and 5 min stand test. Results: Seven individuals (four motor complete; three motor incomplete) completed 20–80 sessions UE and LE training augmented with TSCS and without any serious adverse events. Improvements were reported on the CUE-T in all seven individuals. Two individuals improved their ASIA impairment scale (AIS) classification (B to C; C to D) and two individuals improved their neurologic level of injury by one level (C4–C5; C5–C6). Sensation improved in five individuals and all four who started out with motor complete SCIs were able to voluntarily activate their LEs on command in the presence of stimulation. Conclusion: Individuals with chronic SCI who had previously demonstrated a plateau in function after an intensive outpatient therapy program were able to improve in a variety of UE and LE outcomes in response to TSCS without any adverse events. This was a small pilot study and future fully powered studies with comparative interventions need to be completed to assess efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9396932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93969322022-08-23 Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Tefertiller, Candace Rozwod, Meghan VandeGriend, Eric Bartelt, Patricia Sevigny, Mitch Smith, Andrew C. Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences Objective: To evaluate the impact of using transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TSCSTSCS) on upper and lower extremity function in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective case series. Setting: SCI specific rehabilitation hospital. Participants: A convenience sample (N = 7) of individuals with tetraplegia who had previously been discharged from outpatient therapy due to a plateau in progress. Interventions: Individuals participated in 60 min of upper extremity (UE) functional task-specific practice (FTP) in combination with TSCS and 60 min of locomotor training in combination with TSCS 5x/week. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome for this analysis was the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T). Secondary outcomes include UE motor score (UEMS), LE motor score (LEMS), sensation (light touch and pin prick), Nine-Hole Peg Test, 10 meter walk test, 6 min walk test, and 5 min stand test. Results: Seven individuals (four motor complete; three motor incomplete) completed 20–80 sessions UE and LE training augmented with TSCS and without any serious adverse events. Improvements were reported on the CUE-T in all seven individuals. Two individuals improved their ASIA impairment scale (AIS) classification (B to C; C to D) and two individuals improved their neurologic level of injury by one level (C4–C5; C5–C6). Sensation improved in five individuals and all four who started out with motor complete SCIs were able to voluntarily activate their LEs on command in the presence of stimulation. Conclusion: Individuals with chronic SCI who had previously demonstrated a plateau in function after an intensive outpatient therapy program were able to improve in a variety of UE and LE outcomes in response to TSCS without any adverse events. This was a small pilot study and future fully powered studies with comparative interventions need to be completed to assess efficacy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9396932/ /pubmed/36004322 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.740307 Text en Copyright © 2022 Tefertiller, Rozwod, VandeGriend, Bartelt, Sevigny and Smith. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Sciences
Tefertiller, Candace
Rozwod, Meghan
VandeGriend, Eric
Bartelt, Patricia
Sevigny, Mitch
Smith, Andrew C.
Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
title Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
title_full Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
title_fullStr Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
title_full_unstemmed Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
title_short Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation to Promote Recovery in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
title_sort transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation to promote recovery in chronic spinal cord injury
topic Rehabilitation Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004322
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.740307
work_keys_str_mv AT tefertillercandace transcutaneouselectricalspinalcordstimulationtopromoterecoveryinchronicspinalcordinjury
AT rozwodmeghan transcutaneouselectricalspinalcordstimulationtopromoterecoveryinchronicspinalcordinjury
AT vandegrienderic transcutaneouselectricalspinalcordstimulationtopromoterecoveryinchronicspinalcordinjury
AT barteltpatricia transcutaneouselectricalspinalcordstimulationtopromoterecoveryinchronicspinalcordinjury
AT sevignymitch transcutaneouselectricalspinalcordstimulationtopromoterecoveryinchronicspinalcordinjury
AT smithandrewc transcutaneouselectricalspinalcordstimulationtopromoterecoveryinchronicspinalcordinjury