Cargando…
Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants were rando...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030122 |
_version_ | 1784772042263887872 |
---|---|
author | Martins, Sergio H. L. Cadore, Uislen B. Novaes, Arthur B. Messora, Michel R. Ghiraldini, Bruna Bezerra, Fabio J. B. Botticelli, Daniele de Souza, Sergio L. S. |
author_facet | Martins, Sergio H. L. Cadore, Uislen B. Novaes, Arthur B. Messora, Michel R. Ghiraldini, Bruna Bezerra, Fabio J. B. Botticelli, Daniele de Souza, Sergio L. S. |
author_sort | Martins, Sergio H. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants were randomly installed in the prepared sites: one side received a double acid-etched (DAE) surface and the other a nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) surface. The animals were euthanized 30 and 60 days after surgery, and biopsies were collected for microtomographic and histomorphometric analysis. After 30 days, no intra- and inter-group statistical differences were observed in microtomographic analysis, while at 60 days, bone analysis showed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05) for all the evaluated parameters. Histomorphometric analysis showed, after 30 days, mean % of Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) for DAE and NHA of 31.70 ± 10.42% vs. 40.60 ± 10.22% (p > 0.05), respectively; for % of Bone Area Fraction Occupancy (BAFO), mean values were 45.43 ± 3.597% for DAE and 57.04 ± 5.537% for NHA (p < 0.05). After 60 days, mean %BIC and %BAFO for DAE and NHA implants were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The NHA surface showed superior biological features compared to the DAE treatment, promoting higher bone formation around the implants in an experimental model of bone repair in a grafted area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9397014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93970142022-08-24 Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits Martins, Sergio H. L. Cadore, Uislen B. Novaes, Arthur B. Messora, Michel R. Ghiraldini, Bruna Bezerra, Fabio J. B. Botticelli, Daniele de Souza, Sergio L. S. J Funct Biomater Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants were randomly installed in the prepared sites: one side received a double acid-etched (DAE) surface and the other a nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) surface. The animals were euthanized 30 and 60 days after surgery, and biopsies were collected for microtomographic and histomorphometric analysis. After 30 days, no intra- and inter-group statistical differences were observed in microtomographic analysis, while at 60 days, bone analysis showed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05) for all the evaluated parameters. Histomorphometric analysis showed, after 30 days, mean % of Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) for DAE and NHA of 31.70 ± 10.42% vs. 40.60 ± 10.22% (p > 0.05), respectively; for % of Bone Area Fraction Occupancy (BAFO), mean values were 45.43 ± 3.597% for DAE and 57.04 ± 5.537% for NHA (p < 0.05). After 60 days, mean %BIC and %BAFO for DAE and NHA implants were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The NHA surface showed superior biological features compared to the DAE treatment, promoting higher bone formation around the implants in an experimental model of bone repair in a grafted area. MDPI 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9397014/ /pubmed/35997460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030122 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Martins, Sergio H. L. Cadore, Uislen B. Novaes, Arthur B. Messora, Michel R. Ghiraldini, Bruna Bezerra, Fabio J. B. Botticelli, Daniele de Souza, Sergio L. S. Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits |
title | Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits |
title_full | Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits |
title_short | Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits |
title_sort | evaluation of bone response to a nano ha implant surface on sinus lifting procedures: study in rabbits |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinssergiohl evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits AT cadoreuislenb evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits AT novaesarthurb evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits AT messoramichelr evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits AT ghiraldinibruna evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits AT bezerrafabiojb evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits AT botticellidaniele evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits AT desouzasergiols evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits |