Cargando…

Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants were rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Sergio H. L., Cadore, Uislen B., Novaes, Arthur B., Messora, Michel R., Ghiraldini, Bruna, Bezerra, Fabio J. B., Botticelli, Daniele, de Souza, Sergio L. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030122
_version_ 1784772042263887872
author Martins, Sergio H. L.
Cadore, Uislen B.
Novaes, Arthur B.
Messora, Michel R.
Ghiraldini, Bruna
Bezerra, Fabio J. B.
Botticelli, Daniele
de Souza, Sergio L. S.
author_facet Martins, Sergio H. L.
Cadore, Uislen B.
Novaes, Arthur B.
Messora, Michel R.
Ghiraldini, Bruna
Bezerra, Fabio J. B.
Botticelli, Daniele
de Souza, Sergio L. S.
author_sort Martins, Sergio H. L.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants were randomly installed in the prepared sites: one side received a double acid-etched (DAE) surface and the other a nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) surface. The animals were euthanized 30 and 60 days after surgery, and biopsies were collected for microtomographic and histomorphometric analysis. After 30 days, no intra- and inter-group statistical differences were observed in microtomographic analysis, while at 60 days, bone analysis showed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05) for all the evaluated parameters. Histomorphometric analysis showed, after 30 days, mean % of Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) for DAE and NHA of 31.70 ± 10.42% vs. 40.60 ± 10.22% (p > 0.05), respectively; for % of Bone Area Fraction Occupancy (BAFO), mean values were 45.43 ± 3.597% for DAE and 57.04 ± 5.537% for NHA (p < 0.05). After 60 days, mean %BIC and %BAFO for DAE and NHA implants were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The NHA surface showed superior biological features compared to the DAE treatment, promoting higher bone formation around the implants in an experimental model of bone repair in a grafted area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9397014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93970142022-08-24 Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits Martins, Sergio H. L. Cadore, Uislen B. Novaes, Arthur B. Messora, Michel R. Ghiraldini, Bruna Bezerra, Fabio J. B. Botticelli, Daniele de Souza, Sergio L. S. J Funct Biomater Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants were randomly installed in the prepared sites: one side received a double acid-etched (DAE) surface and the other a nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) surface. The animals were euthanized 30 and 60 days after surgery, and biopsies were collected for microtomographic and histomorphometric analysis. After 30 days, no intra- and inter-group statistical differences were observed in microtomographic analysis, while at 60 days, bone analysis showed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05) for all the evaluated parameters. Histomorphometric analysis showed, after 30 days, mean % of Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) for DAE and NHA of 31.70 ± 10.42% vs. 40.60 ± 10.22% (p > 0.05), respectively; for % of Bone Area Fraction Occupancy (BAFO), mean values were 45.43 ± 3.597% for DAE and 57.04 ± 5.537% for NHA (p < 0.05). After 60 days, mean %BIC and %BAFO for DAE and NHA implants were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The NHA surface showed superior biological features compared to the DAE treatment, promoting higher bone formation around the implants in an experimental model of bone repair in a grafted area. MDPI 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9397014/ /pubmed/35997460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030122 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martins, Sergio H. L.
Cadore, Uislen B.
Novaes, Arthur B.
Messora, Michel R.
Ghiraldini, Bruna
Bezerra, Fabio J. B.
Botticelli, Daniele
de Souza, Sergio L. S.
Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
title Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
title_full Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
title_fullStr Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
title_short Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
title_sort evaluation of bone response to a nano ha implant surface on sinus lifting procedures: study in rabbits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35997460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030122
work_keys_str_mv AT martinssergiohl evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits
AT cadoreuislenb evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits
AT novaesarthurb evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits
AT messoramichelr evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits
AT ghiraldinibruna evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits
AT bezerrafabiojb evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits
AT botticellidaniele evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits
AT desouzasergiols evaluationofboneresponsetoananohaimplantsurfaceonsinusliftingproceduresstudyinrabbits