Cargando…
The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Pandemic Coping Scale (PCS), a new brief measure of coping with pandemic-related stressors. METHODS: The PCS was administered to N = 2316 German participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Routledge
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2112198 |
_version_ | 1784772132878680064 |
---|---|
author | Lotzin, Annett Ketelsen, Ronja Krause, Linda Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Böttche, Maria Schäfer, Ingo |
author_facet | Lotzin, Annett Ketelsen, Ronja Krause, Linda Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Böttche, Maria Schäfer, Ingo |
author_sort | Lotzin, Annett |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Pandemic Coping Scale (PCS), a new brief measure of coping with pandemic-related stressors. METHODS: The PCS was administered to N = 2316 German participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied among random splits of the sample. Global goodness of fit (χ(2), RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI), local goodness of fit (factor loadings, communalities, factor reliability, discriminant validity) and additional test quality criteria (internal consistency, item discrimination and difficulty) were evaluated for a four-factor model vs. a four-factor model combined with a second-order general factor. Convergent and divergent validity were examined by Pearson correlations of the PCS subscales with the Brief-COPE subscales; criterion validity was evaluated by correlations with wellbeing (WHO-5), depressive (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-2). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor solution (‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, ‘Daily Structure’, ‘Prevention Adherence’). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a sufficient global fit for both specified models which did not differ in their fit to the data. Local goodness of fit indices showed moderate to large factor loadings and good factor reliabilities except for the subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’. Internal consistencies were good for the PCS total scale (α = .83), the ‘Healthy Lifestyle’ (α = .79) and the ‘Daily Structure’ (α = .86) subscales, acceptable for ‘Joyful Activities’ (α = .60), and low for ‘Prevention Adherence’ (α = .52). The four subscales evidenced convergent and divergent validity with the Brief-COPE subscales. The subscales ‘Healthy lifestyle’, ‘Joyful activities’ and ‘Daily structure’ showed criterion validity with wellbeing, depressive and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The PCS is a reliable and valid measure to assess pandemic-specific coping behavior in the domains of ‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, and ‘Daily Structure’. The PCS subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’ might be improved by adding items with varying item difficulties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9397468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93974682022-08-24 The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic Lotzin, Annett Ketelsen, Ronja Krause, Linda Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Böttche, Maria Schäfer, Ingo Health Psychol Behav Med Research Article This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Pandemic Coping Scale (PCS), a new brief measure of coping with pandemic-related stressors. METHODS: The PCS was administered to N = 2316 German participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied among random splits of the sample. Global goodness of fit (χ(2), RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI), local goodness of fit (factor loadings, communalities, factor reliability, discriminant validity) and additional test quality criteria (internal consistency, item discrimination and difficulty) were evaluated for a four-factor model vs. a four-factor model combined with a second-order general factor. Convergent and divergent validity were examined by Pearson correlations of the PCS subscales with the Brief-COPE subscales; criterion validity was evaluated by correlations with wellbeing (WHO-5), depressive (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-2). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor solution (‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, ‘Daily Structure’, ‘Prevention Adherence’). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a sufficient global fit for both specified models which did not differ in their fit to the data. Local goodness of fit indices showed moderate to large factor loadings and good factor reliabilities except for the subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’. Internal consistencies were good for the PCS total scale (α = .83), the ‘Healthy Lifestyle’ (α = .79) and the ‘Daily Structure’ (α = .86) subscales, acceptable for ‘Joyful Activities’ (α = .60), and low for ‘Prevention Adherence’ (α = .52). The four subscales evidenced convergent and divergent validity with the Brief-COPE subscales. The subscales ‘Healthy lifestyle’, ‘Joyful activities’ and ‘Daily structure’ showed criterion validity with wellbeing, depressive and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The PCS is a reliable and valid measure to assess pandemic-specific coping behavior in the domains of ‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, and ‘Daily Structure’. The PCS subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’ might be improved by adding items with varying item difficulties. Routledge 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9397468/ /pubmed/36016872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2112198 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lotzin, Annett Ketelsen, Ronja Krause, Linda Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Böttche, Maria Schäfer, Ingo The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic |
title | The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic |
title_full | The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic |
title_fullStr | The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic |
title_short | The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic |
title_sort | pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2112198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lotzinannett thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT ketelsenronja thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT krauselinda thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT ozgaannkathrin thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT bottchemaria thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT schaferingo thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT lotzinannett pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT ketelsenronja pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT krauselinda pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT ozgaannkathrin pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT bottchemaria pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic AT schaferingo pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic |