Cargando…

The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic

This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Pandemic Coping Scale (PCS), a new brief measure of coping with pandemic-related stressors. METHODS: The PCS was administered to N = 2316 German participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lotzin, Annett, Ketelsen, Ronja, Krause, Linda, Ozga, Ann-Kathrin, Böttche, Maria, Schäfer, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2112198
_version_ 1784772132878680064
author Lotzin, Annett
Ketelsen, Ronja
Krause, Linda
Ozga, Ann-Kathrin
Böttche, Maria
Schäfer, Ingo
author_facet Lotzin, Annett
Ketelsen, Ronja
Krause, Linda
Ozga, Ann-Kathrin
Böttche, Maria
Schäfer, Ingo
author_sort Lotzin, Annett
collection PubMed
description This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Pandemic Coping Scale (PCS), a new brief measure of coping with pandemic-related stressors. METHODS: The PCS was administered to N = 2316 German participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied among random splits of the sample. Global goodness of fit (χ(2), RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI), local goodness of fit (factor loadings, communalities, factor reliability, discriminant validity) and additional test quality criteria (internal consistency, item discrimination and difficulty) were evaluated for a four-factor model vs. a four-factor model combined with a second-order general factor. Convergent and divergent validity were examined by Pearson correlations of the PCS subscales with the Brief-COPE subscales; criterion validity was evaluated by correlations with wellbeing (WHO-5), depressive (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-2). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor solution (‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, ‘Daily Structure’, ‘Prevention Adherence’). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a sufficient global fit for both specified models which did not differ in their fit to the data. Local goodness of fit indices showed moderate to large factor loadings and good factor reliabilities except for the subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’. Internal consistencies were good for the PCS total scale (α = .83), the ‘Healthy Lifestyle’ (α = .79) and the ‘Daily Structure’ (α = .86) subscales, acceptable for ‘Joyful Activities’ (α = .60), and low for ‘Prevention Adherence’ (α = .52). The four subscales evidenced convergent and divergent validity with the Brief-COPE subscales. The subscales ‘Healthy lifestyle’, ‘Joyful activities’ and ‘Daily structure’ showed criterion validity with wellbeing, depressive and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The PCS is a reliable and valid measure to assess pandemic-specific coping behavior in the domains of ‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, and ‘Daily Structure’. The PCS subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’ might be improved by adding items with varying item difficulties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9397468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93974682022-08-24 The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic Lotzin, Annett Ketelsen, Ronja Krause, Linda Ozga, Ann-Kathrin Böttche, Maria Schäfer, Ingo Health Psychol Behav Med Research Article This study assessed the validity and reliability of the Pandemic Coping Scale (PCS), a new brief measure of coping with pandemic-related stressors. METHODS: The PCS was administered to N = 2316 German participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied among random splits of the sample. Global goodness of fit (χ(2), RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI), local goodness of fit (factor loadings, communalities, factor reliability, discriminant validity) and additional test quality criteria (internal consistency, item discrimination and difficulty) were evaluated for a four-factor model vs. a four-factor model combined with a second-order general factor. Convergent and divergent validity were examined by Pearson correlations of the PCS subscales with the Brief-COPE subscales; criterion validity was evaluated by correlations with wellbeing (WHO-5), depressive (PHQ-9) and anxiety symptoms (GAD-2). RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis suggested a four-factor solution (‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, ‘Daily Structure’, ‘Prevention Adherence’). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a sufficient global fit for both specified models which did not differ in their fit to the data. Local goodness of fit indices showed moderate to large factor loadings and good factor reliabilities except for the subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’. Internal consistencies were good for the PCS total scale (α = .83), the ‘Healthy Lifestyle’ (α = .79) and the ‘Daily Structure’ (α = .86) subscales, acceptable for ‘Joyful Activities’ (α = .60), and low for ‘Prevention Adherence’ (α = .52). The four subscales evidenced convergent and divergent validity with the Brief-COPE subscales. The subscales ‘Healthy lifestyle’, ‘Joyful activities’ and ‘Daily structure’ showed criterion validity with wellbeing, depressive and anxiety symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The PCS is a reliable and valid measure to assess pandemic-specific coping behavior in the domains of ‘Healthy Lifestyle’, ‘Joyful Activities’, and ‘Daily Structure’. The PCS subscale ‘Prevention Adherence’ might be improved by adding items with varying item difficulties. Routledge 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9397468/ /pubmed/36016872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2112198 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lotzin, Annett
Ketelsen, Ronja
Krause, Linda
Ozga, Ann-Kathrin
Böttche, Maria
Schäfer, Ingo
The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
title The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
title_full The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
title_fullStr The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
title_full_unstemmed The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
title_short The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
title_sort pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2112198
work_keys_str_mv AT lotzinannett thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT ketelsenronja thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT krauselinda thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT ozgaannkathrin thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT bottchemaria thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT schaferingo thepandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT lotzinannett pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT ketelsenronja pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT krauselinda pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT ozgaannkathrin pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT bottchemaria pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic
AT schaferingo pandemiccopingscalevalidityandreliabilityofabriefmeasureofcopingduringapandemic