Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: Proprioceptive training is any intervention aiming to improve proprioceptive function with the ultimate goal to enhance motor function and performance. It has been promoted as an approach to enhance athletic performance and as a tool for sensorimotor rehabilitation. Numerous studies sough...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winter, Leoni, Huang, Qiyin, Sertic, Jacquelyn V. L., Konczak, Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.830166
_version_ 1784772173082132480
author Winter, Leoni
Huang, Qiyin
Sertic, Jacquelyn V. L.
Konczak, Jürgen
author_facet Winter, Leoni
Huang, Qiyin
Sertic, Jacquelyn V. L.
Konczak, Jürgen
author_sort Winter, Leoni
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Proprioceptive training is any intervention aiming to improve proprioceptive function with the ultimate goal to enhance motor function and performance. It has been promoted as an approach to enhance athletic performance and as a tool for sensorimotor rehabilitation. Numerous studies sought to provide evidence on the effectiveness of the approach. However, many different training regimes claiming to train proprioception report a variety of sensorimotor measures that are not directly comparable. This, in turn, makes it difficult to assess effectiveness across approaches. It is the objective of this study to systematically review recent empirical evidence to gain an understanding of which outcome measures are most sensitive, which populations may benefit most from proprioceptive training, and what are the effects on proprioceptive and motor systems. METHODS: Four major databases were searched. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) A quantified pre- and post-treatment measure of proprioceptive function. (2) An intervention or training program believed to influence or enhance proprioceptive function. (3) Contained at least one form of treatment or outcome measure that is indicative of somatosensory function and not confounded by information from other sensory modalities. 4) The study reported of at least one quantified measure of motor performance. RESULTS: Of the 3,297 articles identified by the database search, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for further review. Across studies, proprioceptive training led to comparable gains in both proprioceptive (+46%) and motor performance (+45%). The majority of studies (50/70) applied active movement interventions. Interventions applying somatosensory stimulation were most successful in clinical populations. Joint position sense error (JPSE) was the most commonly used proprioceptive measure and presents a reliable and feasible measure for clinical use. CONCLUSION: Proprioceptive training can lead to significant improvements in proprioceptive and motor function across a range healthy and clinical populations. Regimens requiring active movement of the trainee tended to be most successful in improving sensorimotor performance. Conclusive evidence on how long training gains are retained is still lacking. There is no solid evidence about the underlying long-term neuroplastic changes associated proprioceptive training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9397687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93976872022-09-29 The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review Winter, Leoni Huang, Qiyin Sertic, Jacquelyn V. L. Konczak, Jürgen Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences OBJECTIVE: Proprioceptive training is any intervention aiming to improve proprioceptive function with the ultimate goal to enhance motor function and performance. It has been promoted as an approach to enhance athletic performance and as a tool for sensorimotor rehabilitation. Numerous studies sought to provide evidence on the effectiveness of the approach. However, many different training regimes claiming to train proprioception report a variety of sensorimotor measures that are not directly comparable. This, in turn, makes it difficult to assess effectiveness across approaches. It is the objective of this study to systematically review recent empirical evidence to gain an understanding of which outcome measures are most sensitive, which populations may benefit most from proprioceptive training, and what are the effects on proprioceptive and motor systems. METHODS: Four major databases were searched. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) A quantified pre- and post-treatment measure of proprioceptive function. (2) An intervention or training program believed to influence or enhance proprioceptive function. (3) Contained at least one form of treatment or outcome measure that is indicative of somatosensory function and not confounded by information from other sensory modalities. 4) The study reported of at least one quantified measure of motor performance. RESULTS: Of the 3,297 articles identified by the database search, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for further review. Across studies, proprioceptive training led to comparable gains in both proprioceptive (+46%) and motor performance (+45%). The majority of studies (50/70) applied active movement interventions. Interventions applying somatosensory stimulation were most successful in clinical populations. Joint position sense error (JPSE) was the most commonly used proprioceptive measure and presents a reliable and feasible measure for clinical use. CONCLUSION: Proprioceptive training can lead to significant improvements in proprioceptive and motor function across a range healthy and clinical populations. Regimens requiring active movement of the trainee tended to be most successful in improving sensorimotor performance. Conclusive evidence on how long training gains are retained is still lacking. There is no solid evidence about the underlying long-term neuroplastic changes associated proprioceptive training. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9397687/ /pubmed/36188962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.830166 Text en Copyright © 2022 Winter, Huang, Sertic and Konczak. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Sciences
Winter, Leoni
Huang, Qiyin
Sertic, Jacquelyn V. L.
Konczak, Jürgen
The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
title The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
title_full The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
title_short The Effectiveness of Proprioceptive Training for Improving Motor Performance and Motor Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
title_sort effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor performance and motor dysfunction: a systematic review
topic Rehabilitation Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.830166
work_keys_str_mv AT winterleoni theeffectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview
AT huangqiyin theeffectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview
AT serticjacquelynvl theeffectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview
AT konczakjurgen theeffectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview
AT winterleoni effectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview
AT huangqiyin effectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview
AT serticjacquelynvl effectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview
AT konczakjurgen effectivenessofproprioceptivetrainingforimprovingmotorperformanceandmotordysfunctionasystematicreview