Cargando…

Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND: International research emphasizes the importance of providing early, hospital-based support in return to work (RTW) for cancer patients. Even though oncology health professionals are aware of the scientific evidence, it remains unclear whether they implement this knowledge in current pra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Désiron, Huget, Simons, Berthold, Spooren, Annemie, Camut, Stéphane, Van de Velde, Dominique, Otte, Thomas, Brunois, Théo, Van Kelst, Kirsten, Godderis, Lode
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.819369
_version_ 1784772227812556800
author Désiron, Huget
Simons, Berthold
Spooren, Annemie
Camut, Stéphane
Van de Velde, Dominique
Otte, Thomas
Brunois, Théo
Van Kelst, Kirsten
Godderis, Lode
author_facet Désiron, Huget
Simons, Berthold
Spooren, Annemie
Camut, Stéphane
Van de Velde, Dominique
Otte, Thomas
Brunois, Théo
Van Kelst, Kirsten
Godderis, Lode
author_sort Désiron, Huget
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: International research emphasizes the importance of providing early, hospital-based support in return to work (RTW) for cancer patients. Even though oncology health professionals are aware of the scientific evidence, it remains unclear whether they implement this knowledge in current practice. This paper presents the knowledge and viewpoints of health care professionals (HCPs) on their potential role in their patients' RTW process. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with oncology HCPs were used to describe current practice. Results of these interviews served as input for focus group discussions with managers in oncology hospitals, which led to an agreement on of best practice. RESULTS: This research had the participation of 75% of Belgian institutions involved in oncology health care services. Five themes were identified that influence care providers and staff to implement scientific evidence on RTW in cancer patients: (1) Opinions on the role that care institutions can take in RTW support; (2) Current content of RTW support during oncology care; (3) Scientific bases; (4) Barriers and success factors; and (5) Legislation and regulations. The key elements of the best practice included a generic approach adapted to the needs of the cancer patient supported by a RTW coordinator. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers include RTW support in their current care, but in very varied ways. They follow a process that starts with setting the indication (meaning the identification of patients for whom the provision of work-related care would be useful) and ends with a clear objective agreed upon by HCPs and the patient. We recommend that specific points of interest be included in regulation at both the patient and hospital levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9397919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93979192022-09-29 Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients Désiron, Huget Simons, Berthold Spooren, Annemie Camut, Stéphane Van de Velde, Dominique Otte, Thomas Brunois, Théo Van Kelst, Kirsten Godderis, Lode Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences BACKGROUND: International research emphasizes the importance of providing early, hospital-based support in return to work (RTW) for cancer patients. Even though oncology health professionals are aware of the scientific evidence, it remains unclear whether they implement this knowledge in current practice. This paper presents the knowledge and viewpoints of health care professionals (HCPs) on their potential role in their patients' RTW process. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with oncology HCPs were used to describe current practice. Results of these interviews served as input for focus group discussions with managers in oncology hospitals, which led to an agreement on of best practice. RESULTS: This research had the participation of 75% of Belgian institutions involved in oncology health care services. Five themes were identified that influence care providers and staff to implement scientific evidence on RTW in cancer patients: (1) Opinions on the role that care institutions can take in RTW support; (2) Current content of RTW support during oncology care; (3) Scientific bases; (4) Barriers and success factors; and (5) Legislation and regulations. The key elements of the best practice included a generic approach adapted to the needs of the cancer patient supported by a RTW coordinator. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers include RTW support in their current care, but in very varied ways. They follow a process that starts with setting the indication (meaning the identification of patients for whom the provision of work-related care would be useful) and ends with a clear objective agreed upon by HCPs and the patient. We recommend that specific points of interest be included in regulation at both the patient and hospital levels. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9397919/ /pubmed/36189048 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.819369 Text en Copyright © 2022 Désiron, Simons, Spooren, Camut, Van de Velde, Otte, Brunois, Van Kelst and Godderis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Sciences
Désiron, Huget
Simons, Berthold
Spooren, Annemie
Camut, Stéphane
Van de Velde, Dominique
Otte, Thomas
Brunois, Théo
Van Kelst, Kirsten
Godderis, Lode
Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients
title Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients
title_full Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients
title_short Practice-Based Evidence to Support Return to Work in Cancer Patients
title_sort practice-based evidence to support return to work in cancer patients
topic Rehabilitation Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36189048
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.819369
work_keys_str_mv AT desironhuget practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT simonsberthold practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT spoorenannemie practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT camutstephane practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT vandeveldedominique practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT ottethomas practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT brunoistheo practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT vankelstkirsten practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients
AT godderislode practicebasedevidencetosupportreturntoworkincancerpatients