Cargando…

A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers

Stroke patients often contend with long-term physical challenges that require treatment and support from both formal and informal caregivers. Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) can assist patients in their physical rehabilitation process and relieve some of the burden on the informal caregivers, such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dembovski, Ayelet, Amitai, Yael, Levy-Tzedek, Shelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.793233
_version_ 1784772228054777856
author Dembovski, Ayelet
Amitai, Yael
Levy-Tzedek, Shelly
author_facet Dembovski, Ayelet
Amitai, Yael
Levy-Tzedek, Shelly
author_sort Dembovski, Ayelet
collection PubMed
description Stroke patients often contend with long-term physical challenges that require treatment and support from both formal and informal caregivers. Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) can assist patients in their physical rehabilitation process and relieve some of the burden on the informal caregivers, such as spouses and family members. We collected and analyzed information from 23 participants (11 stroke patients and 12 informal caregivers) who participated in a total of six focus-group discussions. The participants responded to questions regarding using a SAR to promote physical exercises during the rehabilitation process: (a) the advantages and disadvantages of doing so; (b) specific needs that they wish a SAR would address; (c) patient-specific adaptations they would propose to include; and (d) concerns they had regarding the use of such technology in stroke rehabilitation. We found that the majority of the participants in both groups were interested in experiencing the use of a SAR for rehabilitation, in the clinic and at home. Both groups noted the advantage of having the constant presence of a motivating entity with whom they can practice their rehabilitative exercises. The patients noted how such a device can assist formal caregivers in managing their workload, while the informal caregivers indicated that such a system could ease their own workload and sense of burden. The main disadvantages that participants noted related to the robot not possessing human abilities, such as the ability to hold a conversation, to physically guide the patient's movements, and to express or understand emotions. We anticipate that the data collected in this study—input from the patients and their family members, including the similarities and differences between their points of view—will aid in improving the development of SARs for rehabilitation, so that they can better suit people who have had a stroke, and meet their individual needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9397920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93979202022-09-29 A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers Dembovski, Ayelet Amitai, Yael Levy-Tzedek, Shelly Front Rehabil Sci Rehabilitation Sciences Stroke patients often contend with long-term physical challenges that require treatment and support from both formal and informal caregivers. Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) can assist patients in their physical rehabilitation process and relieve some of the burden on the informal caregivers, such as spouses and family members. We collected and analyzed information from 23 participants (11 stroke patients and 12 informal caregivers) who participated in a total of six focus-group discussions. The participants responded to questions regarding using a SAR to promote physical exercises during the rehabilitation process: (a) the advantages and disadvantages of doing so; (b) specific needs that they wish a SAR would address; (c) patient-specific adaptations they would propose to include; and (d) concerns they had regarding the use of such technology in stroke rehabilitation. We found that the majority of the participants in both groups were interested in experiencing the use of a SAR for rehabilitation, in the clinic and at home. Both groups noted the advantage of having the constant presence of a motivating entity with whom they can practice their rehabilitative exercises. The patients noted how such a device can assist formal caregivers in managing their workload, while the informal caregivers indicated that such a system could ease their own workload and sense of burden. The main disadvantages that participants noted related to the robot not possessing human abilities, such as the ability to hold a conversation, to physically guide the patient's movements, and to express or understand emotions. We anticipate that the data collected in this study—input from the patients and their family members, including the similarities and differences between their points of view—will aid in improving the development of SARs for rehabilitation, so that they can better suit people who have had a stroke, and meet their individual needs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9397920/ /pubmed/36188775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.793233 Text en Copyright © 2022 Dembovski, Amitai and Levy-Tzedek. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Sciences
Dembovski, Ayelet
Amitai, Yael
Levy-Tzedek, Shelly
A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers
title A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers
title_full A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers
title_fullStr A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers
title_full_unstemmed A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers
title_short A Socially Assistive Robot for Stroke Patients: Acceptance, Needs, and Concerns of Patients and Informal Caregivers
title_sort socially assistive robot for stroke patients: acceptance, needs, and concerns of patients and informal caregivers
topic Rehabilitation Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9397920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36188775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.793233
work_keys_str_mv AT dembovskiayelet asociallyassistiverobotforstrokepatientsacceptanceneedsandconcernsofpatientsandinformalcaregivers
AT amitaiyael asociallyassistiverobotforstrokepatientsacceptanceneedsandconcernsofpatientsandinformalcaregivers
AT levytzedekshelly asociallyassistiverobotforstrokepatientsacceptanceneedsandconcernsofpatientsandinformalcaregivers
AT dembovskiayelet sociallyassistiverobotforstrokepatientsacceptanceneedsandconcernsofpatientsandinformalcaregivers
AT amitaiyael sociallyassistiverobotforstrokepatientsacceptanceneedsandconcernsofpatientsandinformalcaregivers
AT levytzedekshelly sociallyassistiverobotforstrokepatientsacceptanceneedsandconcernsofpatientsandinformalcaregivers