Cargando…

Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions

No microbiological criteria were included in the 2018 EFP-AAP classification of periodontal diseases that could be used to differentiate between stages and grades. Furthermore, differences in the subgingival microbiome depending on stage and grade have not been established. Sixty subgingival biofilm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafaurie, Gloria Inés, Neuta, Yineth, Ríos, Rafael, Pacheco-Montealegre, Mauricio, Pianeta, Roquelina, Castillo, Diana Marcela, Herrera, David, Reyes, Jinnethe, Diaz, Lorena, Castillo, Yormaris, Sanz, Mariano, Iniesta, Margarita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35998186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273523
_version_ 1784772254963335168
author Lafaurie, Gloria Inés
Neuta, Yineth
Ríos, Rafael
Pacheco-Montealegre, Mauricio
Pianeta, Roquelina
Castillo, Diana Marcela
Herrera, David
Reyes, Jinnethe
Diaz, Lorena
Castillo, Yormaris
Sanz, Mariano
Iniesta, Margarita
author_facet Lafaurie, Gloria Inés
Neuta, Yineth
Ríos, Rafael
Pacheco-Montealegre, Mauricio
Pianeta, Roquelina
Castillo, Diana Marcela
Herrera, David
Reyes, Jinnethe
Diaz, Lorena
Castillo, Yormaris
Sanz, Mariano
Iniesta, Margarita
author_sort Lafaurie, Gloria Inés
collection PubMed
description No microbiological criteria were included in the 2018 EFP-AAP classification of periodontal diseases that could be used to differentiate between stages and grades. Furthermore, differences in the subgingival microbiome depending on stage and grade have not been established. Sixty subgingival biofilm samples were collected in Spain (n = 30) and Colombia (n = 30) from three distinct patient categories: those with periodontal health/gingivitis (n = 20), those with stage I-II periodontitis (n = 20), and those with stage III-IV periodontitis (n = 20). Patients were evaluated by 16S rRNA gene amplification sequencing. Amplicon sequence variants were used to assign taxonomic categories compared to the Human Oral Microbiome Database (threshold ≥97% identity). Alpha diversity was established by Shannon and Simpson indices, and principal coordinate analysis, ANOSIM, and PERMANOVA of the UNIFRAC distances were performed using QIIME2. Although differences in the alpha diversity were observed between samples according to country, Filifactor alocis, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-4] bacterium HMT 369, Fretibacterium fastidiosum, Lachnospiraceae [G-8] bacterium HMT 500, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-5] [Eubacterium] saphenum, Peptostreptococcus stomatis, and Tannerella forsythia were associated with periodontitis sites in all stages. However, only F. alocis, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-4] bacterium HMT 369, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-9] [Eubacterium] brachy, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-5] [Eubacterium] saphenum, and Desulfobulbus sp. HMT 041 were consistent in stage III-IV periodontitis in both countries. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia were differentially expressed in severe lesions in the countries studied. Although some non-cultivable microorganisms showed differential patterns between the different stages of periodontitis, they were not the same in the two countries evaluated. Further studies using larger samples with advanced next-generation techniques for high-throughput sequencing of phyla and non-cultivable bacteria within the subgingival microbiome could provide more insight into the differences between stages of periodontitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9398029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93980292022-08-24 Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions Lafaurie, Gloria Inés Neuta, Yineth Ríos, Rafael Pacheco-Montealegre, Mauricio Pianeta, Roquelina Castillo, Diana Marcela Herrera, David Reyes, Jinnethe Diaz, Lorena Castillo, Yormaris Sanz, Mariano Iniesta, Margarita PLoS One Research Article No microbiological criteria were included in the 2018 EFP-AAP classification of periodontal diseases that could be used to differentiate between stages and grades. Furthermore, differences in the subgingival microbiome depending on stage and grade have not been established. Sixty subgingival biofilm samples were collected in Spain (n = 30) and Colombia (n = 30) from three distinct patient categories: those with periodontal health/gingivitis (n = 20), those with stage I-II periodontitis (n = 20), and those with stage III-IV periodontitis (n = 20). Patients were evaluated by 16S rRNA gene amplification sequencing. Amplicon sequence variants were used to assign taxonomic categories compared to the Human Oral Microbiome Database (threshold ≥97% identity). Alpha diversity was established by Shannon and Simpson indices, and principal coordinate analysis, ANOSIM, and PERMANOVA of the UNIFRAC distances were performed using QIIME2. Although differences in the alpha diversity were observed between samples according to country, Filifactor alocis, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-4] bacterium HMT 369, Fretibacterium fastidiosum, Lachnospiraceae [G-8] bacterium HMT 500, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-5] [Eubacterium] saphenum, Peptostreptococcus stomatis, and Tannerella forsythia were associated with periodontitis sites in all stages. However, only F. alocis, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-4] bacterium HMT 369, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-9] [Eubacterium] brachy, Peptostreptococcaceae [XI][G-5] [Eubacterium] saphenum, and Desulfobulbus sp. HMT 041 were consistent in stage III-IV periodontitis in both countries. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia were differentially expressed in severe lesions in the countries studied. Although some non-cultivable microorganisms showed differential patterns between the different stages of periodontitis, they were not the same in the two countries evaluated. Further studies using larger samples with advanced next-generation techniques for high-throughput sequencing of phyla and non-cultivable bacteria within the subgingival microbiome could provide more insight into the differences between stages of periodontitis. Public Library of Science 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9398029/ /pubmed/35998186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273523 Text en © 2022 Lafaurie et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lafaurie, Gloria Inés
Neuta, Yineth
Ríos, Rafael
Pacheco-Montealegre, Mauricio
Pianeta, Roquelina
Castillo, Diana Marcela
Herrera, David
Reyes, Jinnethe
Diaz, Lorena
Castillo, Yormaris
Sanz, Mariano
Iniesta, Margarita
Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions
title Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions
title_full Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions
title_fullStr Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions
title_short Differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: A comparison of two geographic regions
title_sort differences in the subgingival microbiome according to stage of periodontitis: a comparison of two geographic regions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35998186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273523
work_keys_str_mv AT lafauriegloriaines differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT neutayineth differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT riosrafael differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT pachecomontealegremauricio differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT pianetaroquelina differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT castillodianamarcela differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT herreradavid differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT reyesjinnethe differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT diazlorena differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT castilloyormaris differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT sanzmariano differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions
AT iniestamargarita differencesinthesubgingivalmicrobiomeaccordingtostageofperiodontitisacomparisonoftwogeographicregions