Cargando…

Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate VEMP response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fröhlich, L., Wilke, M., Plontke, S.K., Rahne, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-210028
_version_ 1784772261313511424
author Fröhlich, L.
Wilke, M.
Plontke, S.K.
Rahne, T.
author_facet Fröhlich, L.
Wilke, M.
Plontke, S.K.
Rahne, T.
author_sort Fröhlich, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation. METHODS: Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes. RESULTS: Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (–88±23%for cVEMPs, –96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (–12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs). CONCLUSIONS: BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9398058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93980582022-09-16 Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients Fröhlich, L. Wilke, M. Plontke, S.K. Rahne, T. J Vestib Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation. METHODS: Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes. RESULTS: Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (–88±23%for cVEMPs, –96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (–12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs). CONCLUSIONS: BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator. IOS Press 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9398058/ /pubmed/34308918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-210028 Text en © 2022 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fröhlich, L.
Wilke, M.
Plontke, S.K.
Rahne, T.
Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients
title Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients
title_full Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients
title_fullStr Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients
title_full_unstemmed Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients
title_short Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients
title_sort bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308918
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-210028
work_keys_str_mv AT frohlichl boneconductedvibrationisaneffectivestimulusforotolithtestingincochlearimplantpatients
AT wilkem boneconductedvibrationisaneffectivestimulusforotolithtestingincochlearimplantpatients
AT plontkesk boneconductedvibrationisaneffectivestimulusforotolithtestingincochlearimplantpatients
AT rahnet boneconductedvibrationisaneffectivestimulusforotolithtestingincochlearimplantpatients