Cargando…
How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis
The number of scientific papers published every year continues to increase, but scientific knowledge is not progressing at the same rate. Here we argue that a greater emphasis on falsification – the direct testing of strong hypotheses – would lead to faster progress by allowing well-specified hypoth...
Autores principales: | Rajtmajer, Sarah M, Errington, Timothy M, Hillary, Frank G |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35939392 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78830 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A voxelwise approach to determine consensus regions-of-interest for the study of brain network plasticity
por: Rajtmajer, Sarah M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Establishing ground truth in the traumatic brain injury literature: if replication is the answer, then what are the questions?
por: Priestley, Diana R, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Falsifying the Dehumanization Hypothesis
por: Over, Harriet
Publicado: (2020) -
Responding to the Pandemic of Falsified Medicines
por: Nayyar, Gaurvika M. L., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
The Falsified Medicines Directive: How to secure your supply chain
por: Smith, G, et al.
Publicado: (2014)