Cargando…
Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research
With cardiovascular disease (CVD) posing a significant disease burden in Canada and more broadly, preventative efforts which incorporate best evidence, patient preference, and physician expertise must continue to take place. Primary care providers play a pivotal role in this effort, and a greater un...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000440 |
_version_ | 1784772340439056384 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Ethan Gobraeil, Jeanne Johnston, Sharon Venables, Maddie J. Archibald, Douglas |
author_facet | Lin, Ethan Gobraeil, Jeanne Johnston, Sharon Venables, Maddie J. Archibald, Douglas |
author_sort | Lin, Ethan |
collection | PubMed |
description | With cardiovascular disease (CVD) posing a significant disease burden in Canada and more broadly, preventative efforts which incorporate best evidence, patient preference, and physician expertise must continue to take place. Primary care providers play a pivotal role in this effort, and a greater understanding of patient perspectives is needed to guide management and inform training. We used a validated consensus method, the nominal group technique (NGT), to identify patient-reported experience measures (PREM) related to CVD prevention deemed most important by both patients and providers. The NGT was used by using structured discussions between patients and providers to bring ideas about PREM CVD outcomes to a consensus. Four patient partners and four primary care providers were selected to participate in an NGT session. Each participant wrote down items/questions they believed important in CVD preventative care. After discussions, all items underwent anonymous ranking on a 5-point scale. Items were included/excluded based on 75% agreement a priori. The panel produced 10 items from a total of 26 after 2 rounds of ranking. The top two items were as follows: “Is your treatment plan tailored to you” and “Was your physician good at giving information about your risk factors?” These results are significantly different compared with existing quality measures because they highlight aspects of patient experience and therapeutic relationship. A questionnaire consisting of prioritized PREM items is valuable in quality improvement and continuous professional development (CPD). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9398503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93985032022-08-26 Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research Lin, Ethan Gobraeil, Jeanne Johnston, Sharon Venables, Maddie J. Archibald, Douglas J Contin Educ Health Prof Methodology With cardiovascular disease (CVD) posing a significant disease burden in Canada and more broadly, preventative efforts which incorporate best evidence, patient preference, and physician expertise must continue to take place. Primary care providers play a pivotal role in this effort, and a greater understanding of patient perspectives is needed to guide management and inform training. We used a validated consensus method, the nominal group technique (NGT), to identify patient-reported experience measures (PREM) related to CVD prevention deemed most important by both patients and providers. The NGT was used by using structured discussions between patients and providers to bring ideas about PREM CVD outcomes to a consensus. Four patient partners and four primary care providers were selected to participate in an NGT session. Each participant wrote down items/questions they believed important in CVD preventative care. After discussions, all items underwent anonymous ranking on a 5-point scale. Items were included/excluded based on 75% agreement a priori. The panel produced 10 items from a total of 26 after 2 rounds of ranking. The top two items were as follows: “Is your treatment plan tailored to you” and “Was your physician good at giving information about your risk factors?” These results are significantly different compared with existing quality measures because they highlight aspects of patient experience and therapeutic relationship. A questionnaire consisting of prioritized PREM items is valuable in quality improvement and continuous professional development (CPD). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9398503/ /pubmed/35916890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000440 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Association for Hospital Medical Education, and the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Lin, Ethan Gobraeil, Jeanne Johnston, Sharon Venables, Maddie J. Archibald, Douglas Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research |
title | Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research |
title_full | Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research |
title_fullStr | Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research |
title_short | Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research |
title_sort | consensus-based development of an assessment tool: a methodology for patient engagement in primary care and cpd research |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linethan consensusbaseddevelopmentofanassessmenttoolamethodologyforpatientengagementinprimarycareandcpdresearch AT gobraeiljeanne consensusbaseddevelopmentofanassessmenttoolamethodologyforpatientengagementinprimarycareandcpdresearch AT johnstonsharon consensusbaseddevelopmentofanassessmenttoolamethodologyforpatientengagementinprimarycareandcpdresearch AT venablesmaddiej consensusbaseddevelopmentofanassessmenttoolamethodologyforpatientengagementinprimarycareandcpdresearch AT archibalddouglas consensusbaseddevelopmentofanassessmenttoolamethodologyforpatientengagementinprimarycareandcpdresearch |