Cargando…
Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022
OBJECTIVES: Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Consequently, RDTs have been established as an alternative and additional diagnostic strategy to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.006 |
_version_ | 1784772350468685824 |
---|---|
author | Wagenhäuser, Isabell Knies, Kerstin Hofmann, Daniela Rauschenberger, Vera Eisenmann, Michael Reusch, Julia Gabel, Alexander Flemming, Sven Andres, Oliver Petri, Nils Topp, Max S. Papsdorf, Michael McDonogh, Miriam Verma-Führing, Raoul Scherzad, Agmal Zeller, Daniel Böhm, Hartmut Gesierich, Anja Seitz, Anna K. Kiderlen, Michael Gawlik, Micha Taurines, Regina Wurmb, Thomas Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo Forster, Johannes Weismann, Dirk Weißbrich, Benedikt Dölken, Lars Liese, Johannes Kaderali, Lars Kurzai, Oliver Vogel, Ulrich Krone, Manuel |
author_facet | Wagenhäuser, Isabell Knies, Kerstin Hofmann, Daniela Rauschenberger, Vera Eisenmann, Michael Reusch, Julia Gabel, Alexander Flemming, Sven Andres, Oliver Petri, Nils Topp, Max S. Papsdorf, Michael McDonogh, Miriam Verma-Führing, Raoul Scherzad, Agmal Zeller, Daniel Böhm, Hartmut Gesierich, Anja Seitz, Anna K. Kiderlen, Michael Gawlik, Micha Taurines, Regina Wurmb, Thomas Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo Forster, Johannes Weismann, Dirk Weißbrich, Benedikt Dölken, Lars Liese, Johannes Kaderali, Lars Kurzai, Oliver Vogel, Ulrich Krone, Manuel |
author_sort | Wagenhäuser, Isabell |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Consequently, RDTs have been established as an alternative and additional diagnostic strategy to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). However, reliable clinical and large-scale performance data specific to a SARS-CoV-2 virus variant of concern (VOC) are limited, especially for the Omicron VOC. The aim of this study was to compare RDT performance among different VOCs. METHODS: This single-centre prospective performance assessment compared RDTs from three manufacturers (NADAL, Panbio, MEDsan) with RT-qPCR including deduced standardized viral load from oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a clinical point-of-care setting from November 2020 to January 2022. RESULTS: Among 35 479 RDT/RT-qPCR tandems taken from 26 940 individuals, 164 of the 426 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples tested true positive with an RDT corresponding to an RDT sensitivity of 38.50% (95% CI, 34.00–43.20%), with an overall specificity of 99.67% (95% CI, 99.60–99.72%). RDT sensitivity depended on viral load, with decreasing sensitivity accompanied by descending viral load. VOC-dependent sensitivity assessment showed a sensitivity of 42.86% (95% CI, 32.82–53.52%) for the wild-type SARS-CoV-2, 43.42% (95% CI, 32.86–54.61%) for the Alpha VOC, 37.67% (95% CI, 30.22–45.75%) for the Delta VOC, and 33.67% (95% CI, 25.09–43.49%) for the Omicron VOC. Sensitivity in samples with high viral loads of ≥10(6) SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per mL was significantly lower in the Omicron VOC (50.00%; 95% CI, 36.12–63.88%) than in the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (79.31%; 95% CI, 61.61–90.15%; p 0.015). DISCUSSION: RDT sensitivity for detection of the Omicron VOC is reduced in individuals infected with a high viral load, which curtails the effectiveness of RDTs. This aspect furthert: limits the use of RDTs, although RDTs are still an irreplaceable diagnostic tool for rapid, economic point-of-care and extensive SARS-CoV-2 screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9398563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93985632022-08-24 Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022 Wagenhäuser, Isabell Knies, Kerstin Hofmann, Daniela Rauschenberger, Vera Eisenmann, Michael Reusch, Julia Gabel, Alexander Flemming, Sven Andres, Oliver Petri, Nils Topp, Max S. Papsdorf, Michael McDonogh, Miriam Verma-Führing, Raoul Scherzad, Agmal Zeller, Daniel Böhm, Hartmut Gesierich, Anja Seitz, Anna K. Kiderlen, Michael Gawlik, Micha Taurines, Regina Wurmb, Thomas Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo Forster, Johannes Weismann, Dirk Weißbrich, Benedikt Dölken, Lars Liese, Johannes Kaderali, Lars Kurzai, Oliver Vogel, Ulrich Krone, Manuel Clin Microbiol Infect Original Article OBJECTIVES: Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Consequently, RDTs have been established as an alternative and additional diagnostic strategy to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). However, reliable clinical and large-scale performance data specific to a SARS-CoV-2 virus variant of concern (VOC) are limited, especially for the Omicron VOC. The aim of this study was to compare RDT performance among different VOCs. METHODS: This single-centre prospective performance assessment compared RDTs from three manufacturers (NADAL, Panbio, MEDsan) with RT-qPCR including deduced standardized viral load from oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a clinical point-of-care setting from November 2020 to January 2022. RESULTS: Among 35 479 RDT/RT-qPCR tandems taken from 26 940 individuals, 164 of the 426 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples tested true positive with an RDT corresponding to an RDT sensitivity of 38.50% (95% CI, 34.00–43.20%), with an overall specificity of 99.67% (95% CI, 99.60–99.72%). RDT sensitivity depended on viral load, with decreasing sensitivity accompanied by descending viral load. VOC-dependent sensitivity assessment showed a sensitivity of 42.86% (95% CI, 32.82–53.52%) for the wild-type SARS-CoV-2, 43.42% (95% CI, 32.86–54.61%) for the Alpha VOC, 37.67% (95% CI, 30.22–45.75%) for the Delta VOC, and 33.67% (95% CI, 25.09–43.49%) for the Omicron VOC. Sensitivity in samples with high viral loads of ≥10(6) SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per mL was significantly lower in the Omicron VOC (50.00%; 95% CI, 36.12–63.88%) than in the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (79.31%; 95% CI, 61.61–90.15%; p 0.015). DISCUSSION: RDT sensitivity for detection of the Omicron VOC is reduced in individuals infected with a high viral load, which curtails the effectiveness of RDTs. This aspect furthert: limits the use of RDTs, although RDTs are still an irreplaceable diagnostic tool for rapid, economic point-of-care and extensive SARS-CoV-2 screening. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-02 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9398563/ /pubmed/36028089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.006 Text en © 2022 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wagenhäuser, Isabell Knies, Kerstin Hofmann, Daniela Rauschenberger, Vera Eisenmann, Michael Reusch, Julia Gabel, Alexander Flemming, Sven Andres, Oliver Petri, Nils Topp, Max S. Papsdorf, Michael McDonogh, Miriam Verma-Führing, Raoul Scherzad, Agmal Zeller, Daniel Böhm, Hartmut Gesierich, Anja Seitz, Anna K. Kiderlen, Michael Gawlik, Micha Taurines, Regina Wurmb, Thomas Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo Forster, Johannes Weismann, Dirk Weißbrich, Benedikt Dölken, Lars Liese, Johannes Kaderali, Lars Kurzai, Oliver Vogel, Ulrich Krone, Manuel Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022 |
title | Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022 |
title_full | Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022 |
title_fullStr | Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022 |
title_full_unstemmed | Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022 |
title_short | Virus variant–specific clinical performance of SARS coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from November 2020 to January 2022 |
title_sort | virus variant–specific clinical performance of sars coronavirus two rapid antigen tests in point-of-care use, from november 2020 to january 2022 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagenhauserisabell virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT knieskerstin virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT hofmanndaniela virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT rauschenbergervera virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT eisenmannmichael virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT reuschjulia virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT gabelalexander virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT flemmingsven virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT andresoliver virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT petrinils virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT toppmaxs virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT papsdorfmichael virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT mcdonoghmiriam virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT vermafuhringraoul virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT scherzadagmal virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT zellerdaniel virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT bohmhartmut virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT gesierichanja virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT seitzannak virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT kiderlenmichael virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT gawlikmicha virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT taurinesregina virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT wurmbthomas virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT ernestusralfingo virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT forsterjohannes virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT weismanndirk virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT weißbrichbenedikt virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT dolkenlars virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT liesejohannes virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT kaderalilars virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT kurzaioliver virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT vogelulrich virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 AT kronemanuel virusvariantspecificclinicalperformanceofsarscoronavirustworapidantigentestsinpointofcareusefromnovember2020tojanuary2022 |