Cargando…
Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation
BACKGROUND: Doppler microembolic signals (MES) occur during atrial fibrillation ablation despite of permanent flushed transseptal sheaths, frequent controls of periprocedural coagulation status and the use of irrigated ablation catheters PURPOSE: To investigate the number and type of MES depending o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01010-1 |
_version_ | 1784772439796875264 |
---|---|
author | Christoph, Marian Poitz, David Pfluecke, Christian Forkmann, Mathias Huo, Yan Gaspar, Thomas Schoen, Steffen Ibrahim, Karim Quick, Silvio Wunderlich, Carsten |
author_facet | Christoph, Marian Poitz, David Pfluecke, Christian Forkmann, Mathias Huo, Yan Gaspar, Thomas Schoen, Steffen Ibrahim, Karim Quick, Silvio Wunderlich, Carsten |
author_sort | Christoph, Marian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Doppler microembolic signals (MES) occur during atrial fibrillation ablation despite of permanent flushed transseptal sheaths, frequent controls of periprocedural coagulation status and the use of irrigated ablation catheters PURPOSE: To investigate the number and type of MES depending on the procedure time, prespecified procedure steps, the activated clotting time (ACT) during the ablation procedure and the catheter contact force. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 53 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation by super-irrigated “point-by-point” ablation. All patients underwent a periinterventional, continuous transcranial Doppler examination (TCD) of the bilateral middle cerebral arteries during the complete ablation procedure. RESULTS: An average of 686±226 microembolic signals were detected by permanent transcranial Doppler. Thereby, 569±208 signals were differentiated as gaseous and 117±31 as solid MES. The number of MES with regard to defined procedure steps were as follows: gaseous: [transseptal puncture, 26 ± 28; sheath flushing, 24±12; catheter change, 21±11; angiography, 101±28; mapping, 9±9; ablation, 439±192; protamine administration, 0±0]; solid: [transseptal puncture, 8±8; sheath flushing, 9±5; catheter replacement, 6±6; angiography, not measurable; mapping, 2±5; ablation, 41±22; protamine administration, 0±0]. Significantly less MES occurred with shorter procedure time, higher ACT and the use of tissue contact force monitoring. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that during atrial fibrillation ablation using irrigated, “point-by-point” RF ablation, masses of microembolic signals are detected in transcranial ultrasound especially in the period of RF current application. The number of MES depends on the total procedure time and the reached ACT during ablation. The use of contact force monitoring might reduce MES during RF ablation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10840-021-01010-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9399063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93990632022-08-25 Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation Christoph, Marian Poitz, David Pfluecke, Christian Forkmann, Mathias Huo, Yan Gaspar, Thomas Schoen, Steffen Ibrahim, Karim Quick, Silvio Wunderlich, Carsten J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article BACKGROUND: Doppler microembolic signals (MES) occur during atrial fibrillation ablation despite of permanent flushed transseptal sheaths, frequent controls of periprocedural coagulation status and the use of irrigated ablation catheters PURPOSE: To investigate the number and type of MES depending on the procedure time, prespecified procedure steps, the activated clotting time (ACT) during the ablation procedure and the catheter contact force. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 53 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation by super-irrigated “point-by-point” ablation. All patients underwent a periinterventional, continuous transcranial Doppler examination (TCD) of the bilateral middle cerebral arteries during the complete ablation procedure. RESULTS: An average of 686±226 microembolic signals were detected by permanent transcranial Doppler. Thereby, 569±208 signals were differentiated as gaseous and 117±31 as solid MES. The number of MES with regard to defined procedure steps were as follows: gaseous: [transseptal puncture, 26 ± 28; sheath flushing, 24±12; catheter change, 21±11; angiography, 101±28; mapping, 9±9; ablation, 439±192; protamine administration, 0±0]; solid: [transseptal puncture, 8±8; sheath flushing, 9±5; catheter replacement, 6±6; angiography, not measurable; mapping, 2±5; ablation, 41±22; protamine administration, 0±0]. Significantly less MES occurred with shorter procedure time, higher ACT and the use of tissue contact force monitoring. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that during atrial fibrillation ablation using irrigated, “point-by-point” RF ablation, masses of microembolic signals are detected in transcranial ultrasound especially in the period of RF current application. The number of MES depends on the total procedure time and the reached ACT during ablation. The use of contact force monitoring might reduce MES during RF ablation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10840-021-01010-1. Springer US 2021-05-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9399063/ /pubmed/34060007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01010-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Christoph, Marian Poitz, David Pfluecke, Christian Forkmann, Mathias Huo, Yan Gaspar, Thomas Schoen, Steffen Ibrahim, Karim Quick, Silvio Wunderlich, Carsten Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation |
title | Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation |
title_full | Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation |
title_fullStr | Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation |
title_short | Simple periprocedural precautions to reduce Doppler microembolic signals during AF ablation |
title_sort | simple periprocedural precautions to reduce doppler microembolic signals during af ablation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01010-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christophmarian simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT poitzdavid simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT pflueckechristian simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT forkmannmathias simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT huoyan simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT gasparthomas simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT schoensteffen simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT ibrahimkarim simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT quicksilvio simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation AT wunderlichcarsten simpleperiproceduralprecautionstoreducedopplermicroembolicsignalsduringafablation |