Cargando…

Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field

This paper conducts a pre-registered study aimed to compare binary and continuous set of responses in survey questionnaires. Binary responses consist of two possible opposing response options (Yes/No). Continuous responses are numerical, where respondents can indicate an option on a 0–10 horizontal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivera-Garrido, Noelia, Ramos-Sosa, M. P., Accerenzi, Michela, Brañas-Garza, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17907-4
_version_ 1784772445558800384
author Rivera-Garrido, Noelia
Ramos-Sosa, M. P.
Accerenzi, Michela
Brañas-Garza, Pablo
author_facet Rivera-Garrido, Noelia
Ramos-Sosa, M. P.
Accerenzi, Michela
Brañas-Garza, Pablo
author_sort Rivera-Garrido, Noelia
collection PubMed
description This paper conducts a pre-registered study aimed to compare binary and continuous set of responses in survey questionnaires. Binary responses consist of two possible opposing response options (Yes/No). Continuous responses are numerical, where respondents can indicate an option on a 0–10 horizontal blind line. We study whether feasible sets of binary and continuous responses yield the same outcome (distribution) and have the same cost (duration in minutes). We collect data from 360 households in Honduras that were randomly assigned to Yes/No questions or given a slider (0–10 visual scale) to mark their responses, therefore, we provide causal evidence. We find that respondents are 13% more likely to respond “Yes” and spend 2.1 min less in the binary setting. Additionally, the results suggest that the type of question matters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9399090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93990902022-08-25 Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field Rivera-Garrido, Noelia Ramos-Sosa, M. P. Accerenzi, Michela Brañas-Garza, Pablo Sci Rep Article This paper conducts a pre-registered study aimed to compare binary and continuous set of responses in survey questionnaires. Binary responses consist of two possible opposing response options (Yes/No). Continuous responses are numerical, where respondents can indicate an option on a 0–10 horizontal blind line. We study whether feasible sets of binary and continuous responses yield the same outcome (distribution) and have the same cost (duration in minutes). We collect data from 360 households in Honduras that were randomly assigned to Yes/No questions or given a slider (0–10 visual scale) to mark their responses, therefore, we provide causal evidence. We find that respondents are 13% more likely to respond “Yes” and spend 2.1 min less in the binary setting. Additionally, the results suggest that the type of question matters. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9399090/ /pubmed/35999440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17907-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Rivera-Garrido, Noelia
Ramos-Sosa, M. P.
Accerenzi, Michela
Brañas-Garza, Pablo
Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
title Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
title_full Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
title_fullStr Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
title_full_unstemmed Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
title_short Continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
title_sort continuous and binary sets of responses differ in the field
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17907-4
work_keys_str_mv AT riveragarridonoelia continuousandbinarysetsofresponsesdifferinthefield
AT ramossosamp continuousandbinarysetsofresponsesdifferinthefield
AT accerenzimichela continuousandbinarysetsofresponsesdifferinthefield
AT branasgarzapablo continuousandbinarysetsofresponsesdifferinthefield