Cargando…
Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series
INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery is well established for the treatment of disc degeneration from C3-C7, but there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of CDR at the cervicothoracic junction, C7-T1. CDR is an appealing option, in terms of range of motion preservation,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107454 |
_version_ | 1784772458155343872 |
---|---|
author | Leonard, Sarah E. Song, Hyun Edwards, Charles C. |
author_facet | Leonard, Sarah E. Song, Hyun Edwards, Charles C. |
author_sort | Leonard, Sarah E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery is well established for the treatment of disc degeneration from C3-C7, but there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of CDR at the cervicothoracic junction, C7-T1. CDR is an appealing option, in terms of range of motion preservation, symptom relief, and absence of risk for nonunion. Currently, C7-T1 CDR is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and the existing literature is limited to two case reports that describe the results of a combined two patients. This series explores whether C7-T1 CDR is a reasonable treatment and alternative to fusion. METHODS: We present a case series of seven consecutive patients who underwent CDR at C7-T1 by a single surgeon from January to December of 2019. There were five females and two males with an average age of 61.3 ± 6.4 years. RESULTS: Average follow up was 18.9 ± 2.5 months. The average postoperative NDI score was 22.6 % ± 14.0. We also recorded qualitative data regarding patient satisfaction and revision surgery status. There was one complication of disc subsidence following three months of complete pain resolution. The six other patients reported being very satisfied with their surgical outcome. CONCLUSION: These seven cases dramatically increase the volume of data in the literature on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following CDR at the cervicothoracic junction. Additionally, the heterogeneity of cases shows the effectiveness of this treatment in many real-world cases. A greater volume of cases with longer follow up will be necessary to better establish long-term clinical success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9399142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93991422022-08-25 Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series Leonard, Sarah E. Song, Hyun Edwards, Charles C. Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery is well established for the treatment of disc degeneration from C3-C7, but there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of CDR at the cervicothoracic junction, C7-T1. CDR is an appealing option, in terms of range of motion preservation, symptom relief, and absence of risk for nonunion. Currently, C7-T1 CDR is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and the existing literature is limited to two case reports that describe the results of a combined two patients. This series explores whether C7-T1 CDR is a reasonable treatment and alternative to fusion. METHODS: We present a case series of seven consecutive patients who underwent CDR at C7-T1 by a single surgeon from January to December of 2019. There were five females and two males with an average age of 61.3 ± 6.4 years. RESULTS: Average follow up was 18.9 ± 2.5 months. The average postoperative NDI score was 22.6 % ± 14.0. We also recorded qualitative data regarding patient satisfaction and revision surgery status. There was one complication of disc subsidence following three months of complete pain resolution. The six other patients reported being very satisfied with their surgical outcome. CONCLUSION: These seven cases dramatically increase the volume of data in the literature on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following CDR at the cervicothoracic junction. Additionally, the heterogeneity of cases shows the effectiveness of this treatment in many real-world cases. A greater volume of cases with longer follow up will be necessary to better establish long-term clinical success. Elsevier 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9399142/ /pubmed/35964370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107454 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Series Leonard, Sarah E. Song, Hyun Edwards, Charles C. Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series |
title | Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series |
title_full | Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series |
title_fullStr | Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series |
title_short | Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series |
title_sort | is c7-t1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: a case series |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leonardsarahe isc7t1cervicaldiscreplacementaviabletechniqueacaseseries AT songhyun isc7t1cervicaldiscreplacementaviabletechniqueacaseseries AT edwardscharlesc isc7t1cervicaldiscreplacementaviabletechniqueacaseseries |