Cargando…

Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery is well established for the treatment of disc degeneration from C3-C7, but there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of CDR at the cervicothoracic junction, C7-T1. CDR is an appealing option, in terms of range of motion preservation,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leonard, Sarah E., Song, Hyun, Edwards, Charles C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107454
_version_ 1784772458155343872
author Leonard, Sarah E.
Song, Hyun
Edwards, Charles C.
author_facet Leonard, Sarah E.
Song, Hyun
Edwards, Charles C.
author_sort Leonard, Sarah E.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery is well established for the treatment of disc degeneration from C3-C7, but there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of CDR at the cervicothoracic junction, C7-T1. CDR is an appealing option, in terms of range of motion preservation, symptom relief, and absence of risk for nonunion. Currently, C7-T1 CDR is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and the existing literature is limited to two case reports that describe the results of a combined two patients. This series explores whether C7-T1 CDR is a reasonable treatment and alternative to fusion. METHODS: We present a case series of seven consecutive patients who underwent CDR at C7-T1 by a single surgeon from January to December of 2019. There were five females and two males with an average age of 61.3 ± 6.4 years. RESULTS: Average follow up was 18.9 ± 2.5 months. The average postoperative NDI score was 22.6 % ± 14.0. We also recorded qualitative data regarding patient satisfaction and revision surgery status. There was one complication of disc subsidence following three months of complete pain resolution. The six other patients reported being very satisfied with their surgical outcome. CONCLUSION: These seven cases dramatically increase the volume of data in the literature on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following CDR at the cervicothoracic junction. Additionally, the heterogeneity of cases shows the effectiveness of this treatment in many real-world cases. A greater volume of cases with longer follow up will be necessary to better establish long-term clinical success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9399142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93991422022-08-25 Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series Leonard, Sarah E. Song, Hyun Edwards, Charles C. Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) surgery is well established for the treatment of disc degeneration from C3-C7, but there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of CDR at the cervicothoracic junction, C7-T1. CDR is an appealing option, in terms of range of motion preservation, symptom relief, and absence of risk for nonunion. Currently, C7-T1 CDR is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, and the existing literature is limited to two case reports that describe the results of a combined two patients. This series explores whether C7-T1 CDR is a reasonable treatment and alternative to fusion. METHODS: We present a case series of seven consecutive patients who underwent CDR at C7-T1 by a single surgeon from January to December of 2019. There were five females and two males with an average age of 61.3 ± 6.4 years. RESULTS: Average follow up was 18.9 ± 2.5 months. The average postoperative NDI score was 22.6 % ± 14.0. We also recorded qualitative data regarding patient satisfaction and revision surgery status. There was one complication of disc subsidence following three months of complete pain resolution. The six other patients reported being very satisfied with their surgical outcome. CONCLUSION: These seven cases dramatically increase the volume of data in the literature on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following CDR at the cervicothoracic junction. Additionally, the heterogeneity of cases shows the effectiveness of this treatment in many real-world cases. A greater volume of cases with longer follow up will be necessary to better establish long-term clinical success. Elsevier 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9399142/ /pubmed/35964370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107454 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Leonard, Sarah E.
Song, Hyun
Edwards, Charles C.
Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series
title Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series
title_full Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series
title_fullStr Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series
title_full_unstemmed Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series
title_short Is C7-T1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: A case series
title_sort is c7-t1 cervical disc replacement a viable technique: a case series
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107454
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardsarahe isc7t1cervicaldiscreplacementaviabletechniqueacaseseries
AT songhyun isc7t1cervicaldiscreplacementaviabletechniqueacaseseries
AT edwardscharlesc isc7t1cervicaldiscreplacementaviabletechniqueacaseseries