Cargando…
Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy
PURPOSE: T-tube drainage, primary closure, and biliary stenting are the common bile duct closure methods. There is great debate on the optimal duct closure technique after common bile duct exploration. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the three commonest common bile duct closure...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35786738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02597-3 |
_version_ | 1784772470892396544 |
---|---|
author | Omar, Mohammed Ahmed Redwan, Alaa Ahmed Alansary, Marwa Nasrelden |
author_facet | Omar, Mohammed Ahmed Redwan, Alaa Ahmed Alansary, Marwa Nasrelden |
author_sort | Omar, Mohammed Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: T-tube drainage, primary closure, and biliary stenting are the common bile duct closure methods. There is great debate on the optimal duct closure technique after common bile duct exploration. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the three commonest common bile duct closure methods after common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stone for future generalization. METHODS: In this analysis, 211 patients with common bile duct stone underwent common bile duct exploration from January 2016 to December 2020. The patients were divided according to common bile duct closure techniques into three groups, including the T-tube drainage group (63 patients), primary duct closure group (61 patients), and antegrade biliary stenting group (87 patients). RESULTS: The incidence of overall biliary complications and bile leak were statistically significantly lower in the biliary stenting group than in the other two groups. Also, hospital stays, drain carried time, return to normal activity, re-intervention, and re-admission rates were statistically significantly lower in the biliary stenting group than in the other two groups. There were no statistically significant differences regarding operative and choledochotomy time, retained and recurrent stone, stricture, biliary peritonitis, cholangitis, and the cost among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: We state that the biliary stenting procedure should be the preferred first option for common bile duct closure after common bile duct exploration when compared with T-tube drainage and primary duct closure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (Approval No. NCT04264299). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9399200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93992002022-08-25 Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy Omar, Mohammed Ahmed Redwan, Alaa Ahmed Alansary, Marwa Nasrelden Langenbecks Arch Surg Controlled Clinical Trials PURPOSE: T-tube drainage, primary closure, and biliary stenting are the common bile duct closure methods. There is great debate on the optimal duct closure technique after common bile duct exploration. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the three commonest common bile duct closure methods after common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stone for future generalization. METHODS: In this analysis, 211 patients with common bile duct stone underwent common bile duct exploration from January 2016 to December 2020. The patients were divided according to common bile duct closure techniques into three groups, including the T-tube drainage group (63 patients), primary duct closure group (61 patients), and antegrade biliary stenting group (87 patients). RESULTS: The incidence of overall biliary complications and bile leak were statistically significantly lower in the biliary stenting group than in the other two groups. Also, hospital stays, drain carried time, return to normal activity, re-intervention, and re-admission rates were statistically significantly lower in the biliary stenting group than in the other two groups. There were no statistically significant differences regarding operative and choledochotomy time, retained and recurrent stone, stricture, biliary peritonitis, cholangitis, and the cost among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: We state that the biliary stenting procedure should be the preferred first option for common bile duct closure after common bile duct exploration when compared with T-tube drainage and primary duct closure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (Approval No. NCT04264299). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9399200/ /pubmed/35786738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02597-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Controlled Clinical Trials Omar, Mohammed Ahmed Redwan, Alaa Ahmed Alansary, Marwa Nasrelden Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy |
title | Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy |
title_full | Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy |
title_fullStr | Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy |
title_short | Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy |
title_sort | comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy |
topic | Controlled Clinical Trials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35786738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02597-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omarmohammedahmed comparativestudyofthreecommonbileductclosuretechniquesaftercholedocholithotomysafetyandefficacy AT redwanalaaahmed comparativestudyofthreecommonbileductclosuretechniquesaftercholedocholithotomysafetyandefficacy AT alansarymarwanasrelden comparativestudyofthreecommonbileductclosuretechniquesaftercholedocholithotomysafetyandefficacy |