Cargando…
Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study
This study aimed to investigate the possible factors affecting dentists’ behavior relating to performing oral cancer examinations as part of routine clinical examination. A total of 95 direct clinical observation sessions—utilizing an instrument consisting of 19 evidence-based observational criteria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01903-1 |
_version_ | 1784772475236646912 |
---|---|
author | Jafer, Mohammed Crutzen, Rik Halboub, Esam Moafa, Ibtisam van den Borne, Bart Bajonaid, Amal Jafer, Alhassen Hedad, Ismaeel |
author_facet | Jafer, Mohammed Crutzen, Rik Halboub, Esam Moafa, Ibtisam van den Borne, Bart Bajonaid, Amal Jafer, Alhassen Hedad, Ismaeel |
author_sort | Jafer, Mohammed |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the possible factors affecting dentists’ behavior relating to performing oral cancer examinations as part of routine clinical examination. A total of 95 direct clinical observation sessions—utilizing an instrument consisting of 19 evidence-based observational criteria for oral cancer examinations—were observed by four calibrated dentists. Thirty-two final-year students, 32 interns, and 31 faculty members of Jazan Dental School were examined between April 9 and May 4, 2017. A descriptive analysis was conducted to investigate the frequencies/percentages of the performed observing criteria by all examiners. ANOVA and Tukey tests were carried out to investigate the difference between the examiner groups. A total number of 32 patients participated in the study, whereby each patient was examined by three different examiners from each group, as well as by the attending observer/s. Fewer than 50% of the examiners performed the clinical steps necessary for an oral cancer examination—for example, taking into account past medical history, as well as extra and intra-oral examinations. More than 90% of the examiners examined hard tissue, whereas fewer than 30% of them educated their patients about possible risk factors. A significant difference between examiner groups was found in favor of faculty members. A gap between knowledge and actual practice of oral cancer examinations was evident: majority of participants failed to perform the necessary steps for an oral cancer examination. Previous experience and confidence in performing oral cancer examination are possible explanations for the dentist’s behavior toward oral cancer examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9399221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93992212022-08-25 Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study Jafer, Mohammed Crutzen, Rik Halboub, Esam Moafa, Ibtisam van den Borne, Bart Bajonaid, Amal Jafer, Alhassen Hedad, Ismaeel J Cancer Educ Article This study aimed to investigate the possible factors affecting dentists’ behavior relating to performing oral cancer examinations as part of routine clinical examination. A total of 95 direct clinical observation sessions—utilizing an instrument consisting of 19 evidence-based observational criteria for oral cancer examinations—were observed by four calibrated dentists. Thirty-two final-year students, 32 interns, and 31 faculty members of Jazan Dental School were examined between April 9 and May 4, 2017. A descriptive analysis was conducted to investigate the frequencies/percentages of the performed observing criteria by all examiners. ANOVA and Tukey tests were carried out to investigate the difference between the examiner groups. A total number of 32 patients participated in the study, whereby each patient was examined by three different examiners from each group, as well as by the attending observer/s. Fewer than 50% of the examiners performed the clinical steps necessary for an oral cancer examination—for example, taking into account past medical history, as well as extra and intra-oral examinations. More than 90% of the examiners examined hard tissue, whereas fewer than 30% of them educated their patients about possible risk factors. A significant difference between examiner groups was found in favor of faculty members. A gap between knowledge and actual practice of oral cancer examinations was evident: majority of participants failed to perform the necessary steps for an oral cancer examination. Previous experience and confidence in performing oral cancer examination are possible explanations for the dentist’s behavior toward oral cancer examination. Springer US 2020-10-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9399221/ /pubmed/33094387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01903-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Jafer, Mohammed Crutzen, Rik Halboub, Esam Moafa, Ibtisam van den Borne, Bart Bajonaid, Amal Jafer, Alhassen Hedad, Ismaeel Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study |
title | Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study |
title_full | Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study |
title_short | Dentists Behavioral Factors Influencing Early Detection of Oral Cancer: Direct Clinical Observational Study |
title_sort | dentists behavioral factors influencing early detection of oral cancer: direct clinical observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01903-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jafermohammed dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy AT crutzenrik dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy AT halboubesam dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy AT moafaibtisam dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy AT vandenbornebart dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy AT bajonaidamal dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy AT jaferalhassen dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy AT hedadismaeel dentistsbehavioralfactorsinfluencingearlydetectionoforalcancerdirectclinicalobservationalstudy |