Cargando…

Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION: To assess the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) instead of first-generation flash glucose monitoring (FGM) on hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this randomized controlled interventional study, young individuals with typ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messaaoui, Anissa, Tenoutasse, Sylvie, Hajselova, Lucia, Crenier, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01297-x
_version_ 1784772495308488704
author Messaaoui, Anissa
Tenoutasse, Sylvie
Hajselova, Lucia
Crenier, Laurent
author_facet Messaaoui, Anissa
Tenoutasse, Sylvie
Hajselova, Lucia
Crenier, Laurent
author_sort Messaaoui, Anissa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To assess the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) instead of first-generation flash glucose monitoring (FGM) on hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this randomized controlled interventional study, young individuals with type 1 diabetes used RT-CGM or FGM for 8 weeks. We evaluated changes in time below range (TBR), severe hypoglycaemia (SH), HbA1c, glycaemic variability, and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia with RT-CGM (intervention group) in comparison with FGM. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 37 participants to either the intervention group (n = 19) or the control group (n = 18). At 8 weeks, we did not find a decrease in TBR in either group, but there was a significant reduction in SH in the intervention group. For participants with TBR ≥ 5% at baseline, we observed significant reductions in 24-h TBR, wake TBR, sleep TBR, and glucose variability at 8 weeks in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RT-CGM versus FGM decreased SH in young individuals with type 1 diabetes, and TBR and glucose variability in patients with a higher TBR at baseline. The patient's history should be taken into account when advising on the method of blood glucose monitoring, as RT-CGM could be more effective in younger patients at high risk for SH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04249102. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01297-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9399330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93993302022-08-25 Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial Messaaoui, Anissa Tenoutasse, Sylvie Hajselova, Lucia Crenier, Laurent Diabetes Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: To assess the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) instead of first-generation flash glucose monitoring (FGM) on hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this randomized controlled interventional study, young individuals with type 1 diabetes used RT-CGM or FGM for 8 weeks. We evaluated changes in time below range (TBR), severe hypoglycaemia (SH), HbA1c, glycaemic variability, and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia with RT-CGM (intervention group) in comparison with FGM. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 37 participants to either the intervention group (n = 19) or the control group (n = 18). At 8 weeks, we did not find a decrease in TBR in either group, but there was a significant reduction in SH in the intervention group. For participants with TBR ≥ 5% at baseline, we observed significant reductions in 24-h TBR, wake TBR, sleep TBR, and glucose variability at 8 weeks in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of RT-CGM versus FGM decreased SH in young individuals with type 1 diabetes, and TBR and glucose variability in patients with a higher TBR at baseline. The patient's history should be taken into account when advising on the method of blood glucose monitoring, as RT-CGM could be more effective in younger patients at high risk for SH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04249102. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01297-x. Springer Healthcare 2022-07-23 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9399330/ /pubmed/35870074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01297-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
Messaaoui, Anissa
Tenoutasse, Sylvie
Hajselova, Lucia
Crenier, Laurent
Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial
title Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial
title_short Comparison Between Continuous Versus Flash Glucose Monitoring in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Trial
title_sort comparison between continuous versus flash glucose monitoring in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes: an 8-week prospective randomized trial
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35870074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01297-x
work_keys_str_mv AT messaaouianissa comparisonbetweencontinuousversusflashglucosemonitoringinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadultswithtype1diabetesan8weekprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT tenoutassesylvie comparisonbetweencontinuousversusflashglucosemonitoringinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadultswithtype1diabetesan8weekprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT hajselovalucia comparisonbetweencontinuousversusflashglucosemonitoringinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadultswithtype1diabetesan8weekprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT crenierlaurent comparisonbetweencontinuousversusflashglucosemonitoringinchildrenadolescentsandyoungadultswithtype1diabetesan8weekprospectiverandomizedtrial