Cargando…
Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work?
Cost-effective milking plans have been adapted to supplement the standard supervised twice-daily monthly testing scheme since the 1960s. Various methods have been proposed to estimate daily milk yields (DMY), focusing on yield correction factors. The present study evaluated the performance of existi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.943705 |
_version_ | 1784772499561512960 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Xiao-Lin Wiggans, George R. Norman, H. Duane Miles, Asha M. Van Tassell, Curtis P. Baldwin, Ransom L. Burchard, Javier Dürr, João |
author_facet | Wu, Xiao-Lin Wiggans, George R. Norman, H. Duane Miles, Asha M. Van Tassell, Curtis P. Baldwin, Ransom L. Burchard, Javier Dürr, João |
author_sort | Wu, Xiao-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cost-effective milking plans have been adapted to supplement the standard supervised twice-daily monthly testing scheme since the 1960s. Various methods have been proposed to estimate daily milk yields (DMY), focusing on yield correction factors. The present study evaluated the performance of existing statistical methods, including a recently proposed exponential regression model, for estimating DMY using 10-fold cross-validation in Holstein and Jersey cows. The initial approach doubled the morning (AM) or evening (PM) yield as estimated DMY in AM-PM plans, assuming equal 12-h AM and PM milking intervals. However, in reality, AM milking intervals tended to be longer than PM milking intervals. Additive correction factors (ACF) provided additive adjustments beyond twice AM or PM yields. Hence, an ACF model equivalently assumed a fixed regression coefficient or a multiplier of “2.0” for AM or PM yields. Similarly, a linear regression model was viewed as an ACF model, yet it estimated the regression coefficient for a single milk yield from the data. Multiplicative correction factors (MCF) represented daily to partial milk yield ratios. Hence, multiplying a yield from single milking by an appropriate MCF gave a DMY estimate. The exponential regression model was analogous to an exponential growth function with the yield from single milking as the initial state and the rate of change tuned by a linear function of milking interval. In the present study, all the methods had high precision in the estimates, but they differed considerably in biases. Overall, the MCF and linear regression models had smaller squared biases and greater accuracies for estimating DMY than the ACF models. The exponential regression model had the greatest accuracies and smallest squared biases. Model parameters were compared. Discretized milking interval categories led to a loss of accuracy of the estimates. Characterization of ACF and MCF revealed their similarities and dissimilarities and biases aroused by unequal milking intervals. The present study focused on estimating DMY in AM-PM milking plans. Yet, the methods and relevant principles are generally applicable to cows milked more than two times a day. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9399349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93993492022-08-25 Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work? Wu, Xiao-Lin Wiggans, George R. Norman, H. Duane Miles, Asha M. Van Tassell, Curtis P. Baldwin, Ransom L. Burchard, Javier Dürr, João Front Genet Genetics Cost-effective milking plans have been adapted to supplement the standard supervised twice-daily monthly testing scheme since the 1960s. Various methods have been proposed to estimate daily milk yields (DMY), focusing on yield correction factors. The present study evaluated the performance of existing statistical methods, including a recently proposed exponential regression model, for estimating DMY using 10-fold cross-validation in Holstein and Jersey cows. The initial approach doubled the morning (AM) or evening (PM) yield as estimated DMY in AM-PM plans, assuming equal 12-h AM and PM milking intervals. However, in reality, AM milking intervals tended to be longer than PM milking intervals. Additive correction factors (ACF) provided additive adjustments beyond twice AM or PM yields. Hence, an ACF model equivalently assumed a fixed regression coefficient or a multiplier of “2.0” for AM or PM yields. Similarly, a linear regression model was viewed as an ACF model, yet it estimated the regression coefficient for a single milk yield from the data. Multiplicative correction factors (MCF) represented daily to partial milk yield ratios. Hence, multiplying a yield from single milking by an appropriate MCF gave a DMY estimate. The exponential regression model was analogous to an exponential growth function with the yield from single milking as the initial state and the rate of change tuned by a linear function of milking interval. In the present study, all the methods had high precision in the estimates, but they differed considerably in biases. Overall, the MCF and linear regression models had smaller squared biases and greater accuracies for estimating DMY than the ACF models. The exponential regression model had the greatest accuracies and smallest squared biases. Model parameters were compared. Discretized milking interval categories led to a loss of accuracy of the estimates. Characterization of ACF and MCF revealed their similarities and dissimilarities and biases aroused by unequal milking intervals. The present study focused on estimating DMY in AM-PM milking plans. Yet, the methods and relevant principles are generally applicable to cows milked more than two times a day. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9399349/ /pubmed/36035148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.943705 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wu, Wiggans, Norman, Miles, Van Tassell, Baldwin, Burchard and Dürr. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Wu, Xiao-Lin Wiggans, George R. Norman, H. Duane Miles, Asha M. Van Tassell, Curtis P. Baldwin, Ransom L. Burchard, Javier Dürr, João Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work? |
title | Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work? |
title_full | Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work? |
title_fullStr | Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work? |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work? |
title_short | Statistical Methods Revisited for Estimating Daily Milk Yields: How Well do They Work? |
title_sort | statistical methods revisited for estimating daily milk yields: how well do they work? |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.943705 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuxiaolin statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork AT wiggansgeorger statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork AT normanhduane statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork AT milesasham statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork AT vantassellcurtisp statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork AT baldwinransoml statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork AT burchardjavier statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork AT durrjoao statisticalmethodsrevisitedforestimatingdailymilkyieldshowwelldotheywork |