Cargando…

A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration

OBJECTIVE: The following article explores our evolving understandings of the role of regenerative technology as an effective penile rehabilitation tool in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the setting of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment and PCa survivorship. METHODS: This narrative clinical revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chung, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.005
_version_ 1784772548163010560
author Chung, Eric
author_facet Chung, Eric
author_sort Chung, Eric
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The following article explores our evolving understandings of the role of regenerative technology as an effective penile rehabilitation tool in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the setting of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment and PCa survivorship. METHODS: This narrative clinical review paper summarizes what is currently known about various modalities of regenerative therapy in restoring spontaneous erectile function (EF) in men following PCa treatment with an emphasis on penile rehabilitation strategies. RESULTS: Conventional medical therapy often does not reverse underlying endothelial dysfunction or promote neuro-vasculogenesis to preserve penile health in men with ED. Over the past decade, there has been considerable interest in the role of regenerative therapy to restore endothelial dysfunction and ED without future dependency on medical therapy. Regenerative therapy can be classified into cellular-based (immunomodulators, stem cells, and platelet-rich plasma), biomaterials (nerve graft transfer), and device-related technology (low-intensity shockwave). Although published literature shows early promise in the role of regenerative technology for ED, there is a paucity of high-quality clinical trials in the setting of penile rehabilitation and PCa survivorship to support their use as standard care and be adopted in clinical guidelines. CONCLUSION: While the use of regenerative technology to restore EF is exciting and highly innovative, considerable limitations remain regarding actual clinical translation and the need for longer-term efficacy and safety data as well as governmental regulation on clinical framework and more robust clinical studies before they can be accepted as standard of care to restore EF in men following PCa treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9399549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Second Military Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93995492022-08-26 A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration Chung, Eric Asian J Urol Review OBJECTIVE: The following article explores our evolving understandings of the role of regenerative technology as an effective penile rehabilitation tool in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the setting of prostate cancer (PCa) treatment and PCa survivorship. METHODS: This narrative clinical review paper summarizes what is currently known about various modalities of regenerative therapy in restoring spontaneous erectile function (EF) in men following PCa treatment with an emphasis on penile rehabilitation strategies. RESULTS: Conventional medical therapy often does not reverse underlying endothelial dysfunction or promote neuro-vasculogenesis to preserve penile health in men with ED. Over the past decade, there has been considerable interest in the role of regenerative therapy to restore endothelial dysfunction and ED without future dependency on medical therapy. Regenerative therapy can be classified into cellular-based (immunomodulators, stem cells, and platelet-rich plasma), biomaterials (nerve graft transfer), and device-related technology (low-intensity shockwave). Although published literature shows early promise in the role of regenerative technology for ED, there is a paucity of high-quality clinical trials in the setting of penile rehabilitation and PCa survivorship to support their use as standard care and be adopted in clinical guidelines. CONCLUSION: While the use of regenerative technology to restore EF is exciting and highly innovative, considerable limitations remain regarding actual clinical translation and the need for longer-term efficacy and safety data as well as governmental regulation on clinical framework and more robust clinical studies before they can be accepted as standard of care to restore EF in men following PCa treatment. Second Military Medical University 2022-07 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9399549/ /pubmed/36035357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.005 Text en © 2022 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chung, Eric
A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration
title A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration
title_full A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration
title_fullStr A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration
title_full_unstemmed A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration
title_short A review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: Evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration
title_sort review of regenerative therapies as penile rehabilitation in men following primary prostate cancer treatment: evidence for erectile restoration and cavernous nerve regeneration
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.005
work_keys_str_mv AT chungeric areviewofregenerativetherapiesaspenilerehabilitationinmenfollowingprimaryprostatecancertreatmentevidenceforerectilerestorationandcavernousnerveregeneration
AT chungeric reviewofregenerativetherapiesaspenilerehabilitationinmenfollowingprimaryprostatecancertreatmentevidenceforerectilerestorationandcavernousnerveregeneration