Cargando…
Post-publication critique at top-ranked journals across scientific disciplines: a cross-sectional assessment of policies and practice
Journals exert considerable control over letters, commentaries and online comments that criticize prior research (post-publication critique). We assessed policies (Study One) and practice (Study Two) related to post-publication critique at 15 top-ranked journals in each of 22 scientific disciplines...
Autores principales: | Hardwicke, Tom E., Thibault, Robert T., Kosie, Jessica E., Tzavella, Loukia, Bendixen, Theiss, Handcock, Sarah A., Köneke, Vivian E., Ioannidis, John P. A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36039285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220139 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reducing bias in secondary data analysis via an Explore and Confirm Analysis Workflow (ECAW): a proposal and survey of observational researchers
por: Thibault, Robert T., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature
por: Ioannidis, John P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014–2017)
por: Hardwicke, Tom E., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Chile's Neoliberal Health Reform: An Assessment and a Critique
por: Unger, Jean-Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
por: Hardwicke, Tom E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)