Cargando…

The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs

BACKGROUND: Many workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) do not reach blue-collar workers. To enhance the fit and reach, a Citizen Science (CS) approach was applied to co-create and implement WHPPs. This study aims to evaluate i) the process of this CS approach and ii) the resulting WHPPs. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lelie, Lisa, van der Molen, Henk F., van den Berge, Mandy, van der Feltz, Sophie, van der Beek, Allard J., Hulshof, Carel T. J., Proper, Karin I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14009-8
_version_ 1784772647310065664
author Lelie, Lisa
van der Molen, Henk F.
van den Berge, Mandy
van der Feltz, Sophie
van der Beek, Allard J.
Hulshof, Carel T. J.
Proper, Karin I.
author_facet Lelie, Lisa
van der Molen, Henk F.
van den Berge, Mandy
van der Feltz, Sophie
van der Beek, Allard J.
Hulshof, Carel T. J.
Proper, Karin I.
author_sort Lelie, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) do not reach blue-collar workers. To enhance the fit and reach, a Citizen Science (CS) approach was applied to co-create and implement WHPPs. This study aims to evaluate i) the process of this CS approach and ii) the resulting WHPPs. METHODS: The study was performed in two companies: a construction company and a container terminal company. Data were collected by questionnaires, interviews and logbooks. Using the framework of Nielsen and Randall, process measures were categorized in the intervention, context and mental models. Interviews were transcribed and thematically coded using MaxQDA software. RESULTS: The involvement in the CS approach and co-creating the WHPPs was positively experienced. Information provision, sustained engagement over time and alignment with the workplace’s culture resulted in barriers in the CS process. As to the resulting WHPPs, involvement and interaction during the intervention sessions were particularly experienced in small groups. The reach was affected by the unfavorable planning off the WHPPs and external events of re-originations and the covid-19 pandemic. DISCUSSION: Continuous information provision and engagement over time, better alignment with the workplace’s culture and favorable planning are considered to be important factors for facilitating involvement, reach and satisfaction of the workers in a Citizen science approach to design and implement a WHPP. Further studies continuously monitoring the process of WHPPs using the CS approach could be helpful to anticipate on external factors and increase the adaptability. CONCLUSIONS: Workers were satisfied with the involvement in WHPPs. Organizational and social cultural factors were barriers for the CS approach and its reach. Involvement and interaction in WHPPs were particularly experienced in small grouped sessions. Consequently, contextual and personal factors need be considered in the design and implementation of WHPPs with CS approach among blue-collar workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9399973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93999732022-08-24 The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs Lelie, Lisa van der Molen, Henk F. van den Berge, Mandy van der Feltz, Sophie van der Beek, Allard J. Hulshof, Carel T. J. Proper, Karin I. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Many workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) do not reach blue-collar workers. To enhance the fit and reach, a Citizen Science (CS) approach was applied to co-create and implement WHPPs. This study aims to evaluate i) the process of this CS approach and ii) the resulting WHPPs. METHODS: The study was performed in two companies: a construction company and a container terminal company. Data were collected by questionnaires, interviews and logbooks. Using the framework of Nielsen and Randall, process measures were categorized in the intervention, context and mental models. Interviews were transcribed and thematically coded using MaxQDA software. RESULTS: The involvement in the CS approach and co-creating the WHPPs was positively experienced. Information provision, sustained engagement over time and alignment with the workplace’s culture resulted in barriers in the CS process. As to the resulting WHPPs, involvement and interaction during the intervention sessions were particularly experienced in small groups. The reach was affected by the unfavorable planning off the WHPPs and external events of re-originations and the covid-19 pandemic. DISCUSSION: Continuous information provision and engagement over time, better alignment with the workplace’s culture and favorable planning are considered to be important factors for facilitating involvement, reach and satisfaction of the workers in a Citizen science approach to design and implement a WHPP. Further studies continuously monitoring the process of WHPPs using the CS approach could be helpful to anticipate on external factors and increase the adaptability. CONCLUSIONS: Workers were satisfied with the involvement in WHPPs. Organizational and social cultural factors were barriers for the CS approach and its reach. Involvement and interaction in WHPPs were particularly experienced in small grouped sessions. Consequently, contextual and personal factors need be considered in the design and implementation of WHPPs with CS approach among blue-collar workers. BioMed Central 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9399973/ /pubmed/36002884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14009-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lelie, Lisa
van der Molen, Henk F.
van den Berge, Mandy
van der Feltz, Sophie
van der Beek, Allard J.
Hulshof, Carel T. J.
Proper, Karin I.
The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs
title The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs
title_full The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs
title_fullStr The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs
title_full_unstemmed The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs
title_short The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs
title_sort process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14009-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lelielisa theprocessevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vandermolenhenkf theprocessevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vandenbergemandy theprocessevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vanderfeltzsophie theprocessevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vanderbeekallardj theprocessevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT hulshofcareltj theprocessevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT properkarini theprocessevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT lelielisa processevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vandermolenhenkf processevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vandenbergemandy processevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vanderfeltzsophie processevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT vanderbeekallardj processevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT hulshofcareltj processevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms
AT properkarini processevaluationofacitizenscienceapproachtodesignandimplementworkplacehealthpromotionprograms