Cargando…

Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that binocularity requirements for correspondence play a role in establishing the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in macular degeneration. METHODS: Monocular PRL locations in 202 eyes of 101 patients with macular degeneration (79 ± 10 years) were recorded with the MP1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarita-Nistor, Luminita, Mandelcorn, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.19
_version_ 1784772680666316800
author Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
Mandelcorn, Mark S.
author_facet Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
Mandelcorn, Mark S.
author_sort Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that binocularity requirements for correspondence play a role in establishing the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in macular degeneration. METHODS: Monocular PRL locations in 202 eyes of 101 patients with macular degeneration (79 ± 10 years) were recorded with the MP1 microperimeter. Corresponding PRLs were those with similar polar angle and distance from former fovea in the better eye (BE) and the worse eye (WE). RESULTS: On average, the PRL in the BE was in the foveal proximity at 1.1 ± 0.99 degrees for 55 patients (foveal-driven PRL) and eccentrically at 6.9 ± 3.4 degrees for 46 patients with central lesions involving the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). For the foveal-driven PRL group, the PRL in the BE was not affected by the status of the WE. In 100% of cases, the monocular PRL in the WE was in a corresponding location either on functioning retina or onto the lesion, or would fall onto the lesion during binocular viewing. For the peripheral-driven PRL group, the PRL location depended on the lesion size in both eyes to maximize correspondence and/or the function of peripheral vision during binocular viewing. In this group, PRL correspondence status was different for those with equal, unequal, or extensive lesions in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Binocularity requirements for correspondence play an important role in determining the PRL location. We formulated two principles based on whether the BE has foveal sparing (foveal-driven PRL) or central lesions affecting the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). The PRL should be evaluated in the framework of binocular viewing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9400123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94001232022-08-25 Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease Tarita-Nistor, Luminita Mandelcorn, Mark S. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Low Vision PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that binocularity requirements for correspondence play a role in establishing the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in macular degeneration. METHODS: Monocular PRL locations in 202 eyes of 101 patients with macular degeneration (79 ± 10 years) were recorded with the MP1 microperimeter. Corresponding PRLs were those with similar polar angle and distance from former fovea in the better eye (BE) and the worse eye (WE). RESULTS: On average, the PRL in the BE was in the foveal proximity at 1.1 ± 0.99 degrees for 55 patients (foveal-driven PRL) and eccentrically at 6.9 ± 3.4 degrees for 46 patients with central lesions involving the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). For the foveal-driven PRL group, the PRL in the BE was not affected by the status of the WE. In 100% of cases, the monocular PRL in the WE was in a corresponding location either on functioning retina or onto the lesion, or would fall onto the lesion during binocular viewing. For the peripheral-driven PRL group, the PRL location depended on the lesion size in both eyes to maximize correspondence and/or the function of peripheral vision during binocular viewing. In this group, PRL correspondence status was different for those with equal, unequal, or extensive lesions in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Binocularity requirements for correspondence play an important role in determining the PRL location. We formulated two principles based on whether the BE has foveal sparing (foveal-driven PRL) or central lesions affecting the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). The PRL should be evaluated in the framework of binocular viewing. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9400123/ /pubmed/35976637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.19 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Low Vision
Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
Mandelcorn, Mark S.
Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease
title Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease
title_full Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease
title_fullStr Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease
title_full_unstemmed Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease
title_short Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease
title_sort binocularity principles of prl development in patients with macular disease
topic Low Vision
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.19
work_keys_str_mv AT taritanistorluminita binocularityprinciplesofprldevelopmentinpatientswithmaculardisease
AT mandelcornmarks binocularityprinciplesofprldevelopmentinpatientswithmaculardisease