Cargando…
Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease
PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that binocularity requirements for correspondence play a role in establishing the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in macular degeneration. METHODS: Monocular PRL locations in 202 eyes of 101 patients with macular degeneration (79 ± 10 years) were recorded with the MP1...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.19 |
_version_ | 1784772680666316800 |
---|---|
author | Tarita-Nistor, Luminita Mandelcorn, Mark S. |
author_facet | Tarita-Nistor, Luminita Mandelcorn, Mark S. |
author_sort | Tarita-Nistor, Luminita |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that binocularity requirements for correspondence play a role in establishing the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in macular degeneration. METHODS: Monocular PRL locations in 202 eyes of 101 patients with macular degeneration (79 ± 10 years) were recorded with the MP1 microperimeter. Corresponding PRLs were those with similar polar angle and distance from former fovea in the better eye (BE) and the worse eye (WE). RESULTS: On average, the PRL in the BE was in the foveal proximity at 1.1 ± 0.99 degrees for 55 patients (foveal-driven PRL) and eccentrically at 6.9 ± 3.4 degrees for 46 patients with central lesions involving the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). For the foveal-driven PRL group, the PRL in the BE was not affected by the status of the WE. In 100% of cases, the monocular PRL in the WE was in a corresponding location either on functioning retina or onto the lesion, or would fall onto the lesion during binocular viewing. For the peripheral-driven PRL group, the PRL location depended on the lesion size in both eyes to maximize correspondence and/or the function of peripheral vision during binocular viewing. In this group, PRL correspondence status was different for those with equal, unequal, or extensive lesions in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Binocularity requirements for correspondence play an important role in determining the PRL location. We formulated two principles based on whether the BE has foveal sparing (foveal-driven PRL) or central lesions affecting the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). The PRL should be evaluated in the framework of binocular viewing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9400123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94001232022-08-25 Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease Tarita-Nistor, Luminita Mandelcorn, Mark S. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Low Vision PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that binocularity requirements for correspondence play a role in establishing the preferred retinal locus (PRL) in macular degeneration. METHODS: Monocular PRL locations in 202 eyes of 101 patients with macular degeneration (79 ± 10 years) were recorded with the MP1 microperimeter. Corresponding PRLs were those with similar polar angle and distance from former fovea in the better eye (BE) and the worse eye (WE). RESULTS: On average, the PRL in the BE was in the foveal proximity at 1.1 ± 0.99 degrees for 55 patients (foveal-driven PRL) and eccentrically at 6.9 ± 3.4 degrees for 46 patients with central lesions involving the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). For the foveal-driven PRL group, the PRL in the BE was not affected by the status of the WE. In 100% of cases, the monocular PRL in the WE was in a corresponding location either on functioning retina or onto the lesion, or would fall onto the lesion during binocular viewing. For the peripheral-driven PRL group, the PRL location depended on the lesion size in both eyes to maximize correspondence and/or the function of peripheral vision during binocular viewing. In this group, PRL correspondence status was different for those with equal, unequal, or extensive lesions in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Binocularity requirements for correspondence play an important role in determining the PRL location. We formulated two principles based on whether the BE has foveal sparing (foveal-driven PRL) or central lesions affecting the fovea (peripheral-driven PRL). The PRL should be evaluated in the framework of binocular viewing. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9400123/ /pubmed/35976637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.19 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Low Vision Tarita-Nistor, Luminita Mandelcorn, Mark S. Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease |
title | Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease |
title_full | Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease |
title_fullStr | Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease |
title_short | Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease |
title_sort | binocularity principles of prl development in patients with macular disease |
topic | Low Vision |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.9.19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taritanistorluminita binocularityprinciplesofprldevelopmentinpatientswithmaculardisease AT mandelcornmarks binocularityprinciplesofprldevelopmentinpatientswithmaculardisease |