Cargando…
A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing
BACKGROUND: Ageing refers to the natural and physiological changes that individuals experience over the years. This process also involves modifications in terms of communicative-pragmatics, namely the ability to convey meanings in social contexts and to interact with other people using various expre...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03304-z |
_version_ | 1784772714845700096 |
---|---|
author | Hilviu, Dize Gabbatore, Ilaria Parola, Alberto Bosco, Francesca M. |
author_facet | Hilviu, Dize Gabbatore, Ilaria Parola, Alberto Bosco, Francesca M. |
author_sort | Hilviu, Dize |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ageing refers to the natural and physiological changes that individuals experience over the years. This process also involves modifications in terms of communicative-pragmatics, namely the ability to convey meanings in social contexts and to interact with other people using various expressive means, such as linguistic, extralinguistic and paralinguistic aspects of communication. Very few studies have provided a complete assessment of communicative-pragmatic performance in healthy ageing. METHODS: The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess communicative-pragmatic ability in three samples of 20 (N = 60) healthy adults, each belonging to a different age range (20–40, 65–75, 76–86 years old) and to compare their performance in order to observe any potential changes in their ability to communicate. We also explored the potential role of education and sex on the communicative-pragmatic abilities observed. The three age groups were evaluated with a between-study design by means of the Assessment Battery for Communication (ABaCo), a validated assessment tool characterised by five scales: linguistic, extralinguistic, paralinguistic, contextual and conversational. RESULTS: The results indicated that the pragmatic ability assessed by the ABaCo is poorer in older participants when compared to the younger ones (main effect of age group: F(2,56) = 9.097; p < .001). Specifically, significant differences were detected in tasks on the extralinguistic, paralinguistic and contextual scales. Whereas the data highlighted a significant role of education (F(1,56) = 4.713; p = .034), no sex-related differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the ageing process may also affect communicative-pragmatic ability and a comprehensive assessment of the components of such ability may help to better identify difficulties often experienced by older individuals in their daily life activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03304-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9400309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94003092022-08-25 A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing Hilviu, Dize Gabbatore, Ilaria Parola, Alberto Bosco, Francesca M. BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Ageing refers to the natural and physiological changes that individuals experience over the years. This process also involves modifications in terms of communicative-pragmatics, namely the ability to convey meanings in social contexts and to interact with other people using various expressive means, such as linguistic, extralinguistic and paralinguistic aspects of communication. Very few studies have provided a complete assessment of communicative-pragmatic performance in healthy ageing. METHODS: The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess communicative-pragmatic ability in three samples of 20 (N = 60) healthy adults, each belonging to a different age range (20–40, 65–75, 76–86 years old) and to compare their performance in order to observe any potential changes in their ability to communicate. We also explored the potential role of education and sex on the communicative-pragmatic abilities observed. The three age groups were evaluated with a between-study design by means of the Assessment Battery for Communication (ABaCo), a validated assessment tool characterised by five scales: linguistic, extralinguistic, paralinguistic, contextual and conversational. RESULTS: The results indicated that the pragmatic ability assessed by the ABaCo is poorer in older participants when compared to the younger ones (main effect of age group: F(2,56) = 9.097; p < .001). Specifically, significant differences were detected in tasks on the extralinguistic, paralinguistic and contextual scales. Whereas the data highlighted a significant role of education (F(1,56) = 4.713; p = .034), no sex-related differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the ageing process may also affect communicative-pragmatic ability and a comprehensive assessment of the components of such ability may help to better identify difficulties often experienced by older individuals in their daily life activities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03304-z. BioMed Central 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9400309/ /pubmed/35999510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03304-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hilviu, Dize Gabbatore, Ilaria Parola, Alberto Bosco, Francesca M. A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing |
title | A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing |
title_full | A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing |
title_short | A cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing |
title_sort | cross-sectional study to assess pragmatic strengths and weaknesses in healthy ageing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35999510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03304-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilviudize acrosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing AT gabbatoreilaria acrosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing AT parolaalberto acrosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing AT boscofrancescam acrosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing AT hilviudize crosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing AT gabbatoreilaria crosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing AT parolaalberto crosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing AT boscofrancescam crosssectionalstudytoassesspragmaticstrengthsandweaknessesinhealthyageing |