Cargando…

A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK

Background Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have given rise to an emerging multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgeons. At present, there is a relative paucity of evidence on best practice. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Rushabh, Kamble, Rituja, Herieka, Mohammed, Dalal, Milind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034060
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28339
_version_ 1784772765344071680
author Shah, Rushabh
Kamble, Rituja
Herieka, Mohammed
Dalal, Milind
author_facet Shah, Rushabh
Kamble, Rituja
Herieka, Mohammed
Dalal, Milind
author_sort Shah, Rushabh
collection PubMed
description Background Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have given rise to an emerging multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgeons. At present, there is a relative paucity of evidence on best practice. This study sought to assess current national practice concerning perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE in the United Kingdom (UK) and to determine the factors involved in reconstruction choice. Methodology An anonymised survey was circulated to consultant plastic surgeons at all 48 UK centres performing perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE. Responses were collected between October 2021 and April 2022. Results Complete responses were received from 24 units nationally. All units had a dedicated APE/ELAPE service. Overall, 70% adopted a standardised reconstructive approach, the most common being the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 11). Significant variation was identified in the reconstructive technique. Similar differences were observed in the perceived importance of surgical factors guiding the reconstructive decision-making process, the top priorities being the size of the defect and previous radiotherapy. Conclusions The variability of responses suggests a lack of national consensus on optimal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE, despite the majority of centres employing a standardised approach to reconstruction. Our study highlights important surgical decision-making factors and provides valuable insight to aid in developing national collaborative evidence-based guidelines on best practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9400553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94005532022-08-27 A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK Shah, Rushabh Kamble, Rituja Herieka, Mohammed Dalal, Milind Cureus Plastic Surgery Background Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have given rise to an emerging multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgeons. At present, there is a relative paucity of evidence on best practice. This study sought to assess current national practice concerning perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE in the United Kingdom (UK) and to determine the factors involved in reconstruction choice. Methodology An anonymised survey was circulated to consultant plastic surgeons at all 48 UK centres performing perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE. Responses were collected between October 2021 and April 2022. Results Complete responses were received from 24 units nationally. All units had a dedicated APE/ELAPE service. Overall, 70% adopted a standardised reconstructive approach, the most common being the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 11). Significant variation was identified in the reconstructive technique. Similar differences were observed in the perceived importance of surgical factors guiding the reconstructive decision-making process, the top priorities being the size of the defect and previous radiotherapy. Conclusions The variability of responses suggests a lack of national consensus on optimal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE, despite the majority of centres employing a standardised approach to reconstruction. Our study highlights important surgical decision-making factors and provides valuable insight to aid in developing national collaborative evidence-based guidelines on best practice. Cureus 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9400553/ /pubmed/36034060 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28339 Text en Copyright © 2022, Shah et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Plastic Surgery
Shah, Rushabh
Kamble, Rituja
Herieka, Mohammed
Dalal, Milind
A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK
title A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK
title_full A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK
title_fullStr A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK
title_full_unstemmed A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK
title_short A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK
title_sort national survey on perineal reconstruction following standard and extralevator abdominoperineal excision: current practices and trends in the uk
topic Plastic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034060
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28339
work_keys_str_mv AT shahrushabh anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk
AT kamblerituja anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk
AT heriekamohammed anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk
AT dalalmilind anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk
AT shahrushabh nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk
AT kamblerituja nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk
AT heriekamohammed nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk
AT dalalmilind nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk