Cargando…
A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK
Background Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have given rise to an emerging multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgeons. At present, there is a relative paucity of evidence on best practice. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034060 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28339 |
_version_ | 1784772765344071680 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Rushabh Kamble, Rituja Herieka, Mohammed Dalal, Milind |
author_facet | Shah, Rushabh Kamble, Rituja Herieka, Mohammed Dalal, Milind |
author_sort | Shah, Rushabh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have given rise to an emerging multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgeons. At present, there is a relative paucity of evidence on best practice. This study sought to assess current national practice concerning perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE in the United Kingdom (UK) and to determine the factors involved in reconstruction choice. Methodology An anonymised survey was circulated to consultant plastic surgeons at all 48 UK centres performing perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE. Responses were collected between October 2021 and April 2022. Results Complete responses were received from 24 units nationally. All units had a dedicated APE/ELAPE service. Overall, 70% adopted a standardised reconstructive approach, the most common being the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 11). Significant variation was identified in the reconstructive technique. Similar differences were observed in the perceived importance of surgical factors guiding the reconstructive decision-making process, the top priorities being the size of the defect and previous radiotherapy. Conclusions The variability of responses suggests a lack of national consensus on optimal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE, despite the majority of centres employing a standardised approach to reconstruction. Our study highlights important surgical decision-making factors and provides valuable insight to aid in developing national collaborative evidence-based guidelines on best practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9400553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94005532022-08-27 A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK Shah, Rushabh Kamble, Rituja Herieka, Mohammed Dalal, Milind Cureus Plastic Surgery Background Challenging perineal defects resulting from extralevator (ELAPE) and standard abdominoperineal excision (APE) have given rise to an emerging multidisciplinary approach between colorectal and plastic surgeons. At present, there is a relative paucity of evidence on best practice. This study sought to assess current national practice concerning perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE in the United Kingdom (UK) and to determine the factors involved in reconstruction choice. Methodology An anonymised survey was circulated to consultant plastic surgeons at all 48 UK centres performing perineal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE. Responses were collected between October 2021 and April 2022. Results Complete responses were received from 24 units nationally. All units had a dedicated APE/ELAPE service. Overall, 70% adopted a standardised reconstructive approach, the most common being the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (n = 11). Significant variation was identified in the reconstructive technique. Similar differences were observed in the perceived importance of surgical factors guiding the reconstructive decision-making process, the top priorities being the size of the defect and previous radiotherapy. Conclusions The variability of responses suggests a lack of national consensus on optimal reconstruction following APE/ELAPE, despite the majority of centres employing a standardised approach to reconstruction. Our study highlights important surgical decision-making factors and provides valuable insight to aid in developing national collaborative evidence-based guidelines on best practice. Cureus 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9400553/ /pubmed/36034060 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28339 Text en Copyright © 2022, Shah et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Plastic Surgery Shah, Rushabh Kamble, Rituja Herieka, Mohammed Dalal, Milind A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK |
title | A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK |
title_full | A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK |
title_fullStr | A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK |
title_short | A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK |
title_sort | national survey on perineal reconstruction following standard and extralevator abdominoperineal excision: current practices and trends in the uk |
topic | Plastic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034060 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahrushabh anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk AT kamblerituja anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk AT heriekamohammed anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk AT dalalmilind anationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk AT shahrushabh nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk AT kamblerituja nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk AT heriekamohammed nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk AT dalalmilind nationalsurveyonperinealreconstructionfollowingstandardandextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisioncurrentpracticesandtrendsintheuk |