Cargando…

The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence

Flexible control of the contents of working memory (WM) includes removing no-longer-relevant information. Although simply withdrawing attention offers a “passive” mechanism, empirical findings suggest that it is also possible to actively remove information from WM. In this Registered Report we teste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Jiangang, Postle, Bradley R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072093
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.222
_version_ 1784772783117434880
author Shan, Jiangang
Postle, Bradley R.
author_facet Shan, Jiangang
Postle, Bradley R.
author_sort Shan, Jiangang
collection PubMed
description Flexible control of the contents of working memory (WM) includes removing no-longer-relevant information. Although simply withdrawing attention offers a “passive” mechanism, empirical findings suggest that it is also possible to actively remove information from WM. In this Registered Report we tested evidence that the bias (serial dependence) that an item exerts on the subsequent trial will be opposite in sign—attraction vs. repulsion — depending on whether it was passively or actively removed, respectively. A repulsive bias would be consistent with a specific mechanism for active removal: a rapid adaptation-like modification of perceptual circuitry. In a preliminary study, trials of two types were administered in pairs, multi-item WM followed by 1-item delayed recall, and we evaluated serial dependence of the latter on items from the former. In the first trial of each pair, two memoranda were presented, then one was designated irrelevant, then a third memorandum was presented. The critical manipulation was whether the third item was presented at the same location as the now “irrelevant memory item” (IMI). Overlap between the two should prompt the active removal of the IMI, whereas nonoverlap might prompt just the withdrawal of attention. Whereas the IMI exerted the expected attractive bias on 1-item recall in the no-overlap condition, we found an (unexpected) repulsive bias in the overlap condition. Because repulsive biases have been attributed to the adaptation-like modification of perceptual circuitry, replication of this result in this Registered Report would provide independent evidence for this mechanism for active removal from WM. Interpretation of the Stage 2 results are complicated by the fact that the approved Registered Report, carried out online, generated data that failed to meet a basic sanity check, and were therefore uninterpretable. Consequently, a follow-up lab-based experiment using procedures similar to the Registered Report generated results consistent with the hypothesis of principal theoretical interest: The IMI in the overlap condition exerted a repulsive bias on the subsequent trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9400626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94006262022-09-06 The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence Shan, Jiangang Postle, Bradley R. J Cogn Registered Report Flexible control of the contents of working memory (WM) includes removing no-longer-relevant information. Although simply withdrawing attention offers a “passive” mechanism, empirical findings suggest that it is also possible to actively remove information from WM. In this Registered Report we tested evidence that the bias (serial dependence) that an item exerts on the subsequent trial will be opposite in sign—attraction vs. repulsion — depending on whether it was passively or actively removed, respectively. A repulsive bias would be consistent with a specific mechanism for active removal: a rapid adaptation-like modification of perceptual circuitry. In a preliminary study, trials of two types were administered in pairs, multi-item WM followed by 1-item delayed recall, and we evaluated serial dependence of the latter on items from the former. In the first trial of each pair, two memoranda were presented, then one was designated irrelevant, then a third memorandum was presented. The critical manipulation was whether the third item was presented at the same location as the now “irrelevant memory item” (IMI). Overlap between the two should prompt the active removal of the IMI, whereas nonoverlap might prompt just the withdrawal of attention. Whereas the IMI exerted the expected attractive bias on 1-item recall in the no-overlap condition, we found an (unexpected) repulsive bias in the overlap condition. Because repulsive biases have been attributed to the adaptation-like modification of perceptual circuitry, replication of this result in this Registered Report would provide independent evidence for this mechanism for active removal from WM. Interpretation of the Stage 2 results are complicated by the fact that the approved Registered Report, carried out online, generated data that failed to meet a basic sanity check, and were therefore uninterpretable. Consequently, a follow-up lab-based experiment using procedures similar to the Registered Report generated results consistent with the hypothesis of principal theoretical interest: The IMI in the overlap condition exerted a repulsive bias on the subsequent trial. Ubiquity Press 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9400626/ /pubmed/36072093 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.222 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Registered Report
Shan, Jiangang
Postle, Bradley R.
The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence
title The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence
title_full The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence
title_fullStr The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence
title_short The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence
title_sort influence of active removal from working memory on serial dependence
topic Registered Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072093
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.222
work_keys_str_mv AT shanjiangang theinfluenceofactiveremovalfromworkingmemoryonserialdependence
AT postlebradleyr theinfluenceofactiveremovalfromworkingmemoryonserialdependence
AT shanjiangang influenceofactiveremovalfromworkingmemoryonserialdependence
AT postlebradleyr influenceofactiveremovalfromworkingmemoryonserialdependence