Cargando…

Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings

It has been proposed that cognitive control processes may be implemented in a contextually appropriate manner through the encoding, and cued retrieval, of associations between stimuli and the control processes that were active during their encoding, forming “stimulus-control bindings” as part of epi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehead, Peter S., Pfeuffer, Christina U., Egner, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072115
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.218
_version_ 1784772788164231168
author Whitehead, Peter S.
Pfeuffer, Christina U.
Egner, Tobias
author_facet Whitehead, Peter S.
Pfeuffer, Christina U.
Egner, Tobias
author_sort Whitehead, Peter S.
collection PubMed
description It has been proposed that cognitive control processes may be implemented in a contextually appropriate manner through the encoding, and cued retrieval, of associations between stimuli and the control processes that were active during their encoding, forming “stimulus-control bindings” as part of episodic event files. Prior work has found strong evidence for such a mechanism by observing behavioral effects of stimulus-control bindings based on a single pairing (one-shot learning). Here, we addressed the important question of how durable these one-shot stimulus-control bindings are. Over three experiments, we investigated the durability of one-shot stimulus-control bindings in relation to both the passage of time and the number of intervening events between the encoding (prime) and retrieval (probe) of the stimulus-control bindings. We found that stimulus-control bindings are quite robust to temporal decay, lasting at least up to 5 minutes in the absence of similar intervening events. By contrast, binding effects were more short-lived in the face of interference from the encoding of similar events between the prime and probe, with a maximum duration of ~2 minutes. Together, these results shed new light on the characteristics of the binding mechanisms underlying the integration of internal control processes in episodic event files and highlight that interference, rather than temporal decay, may be the main limiting factor on long-term effects of item-specific one-shot control learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9400647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94006472022-09-06 Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings Whitehead, Peter S. Pfeuffer, Christina U. Egner, Tobias J Cogn Research Article It has been proposed that cognitive control processes may be implemented in a contextually appropriate manner through the encoding, and cued retrieval, of associations between stimuli and the control processes that were active during their encoding, forming “stimulus-control bindings” as part of episodic event files. Prior work has found strong evidence for such a mechanism by observing behavioral effects of stimulus-control bindings based on a single pairing (one-shot learning). Here, we addressed the important question of how durable these one-shot stimulus-control bindings are. Over three experiments, we investigated the durability of one-shot stimulus-control bindings in relation to both the passage of time and the number of intervening events between the encoding (prime) and retrieval (probe) of the stimulus-control bindings. We found that stimulus-control bindings are quite robust to temporal decay, lasting at least up to 5 minutes in the absence of similar intervening events. By contrast, binding effects were more short-lived in the face of interference from the encoding of similar events between the prime and probe, with a maximum duration of ~2 minutes. Together, these results shed new light on the characteristics of the binding mechanisms underlying the integration of internal control processes in episodic event files and highlight that interference, rather than temporal decay, may be the main limiting factor on long-term effects of item-specific one-shot control learning. Ubiquity Press 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9400647/ /pubmed/36072115 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.218 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Whitehead, Peter S.
Pfeuffer, Christina U.
Egner, Tobias
Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings
title Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings
title_full Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings
title_fullStr Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings
title_short Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings
title_sort assessing the durability of one-shot stimulus-control bindings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072115
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.218
work_keys_str_mv AT whiteheadpeters assessingthedurabilityofoneshotstimuluscontrolbindings
AT pfeufferchristinau assessingthedurabilityofoneshotstimuluscontrolbindings
AT egnertobias assessingthedurabilityofoneshotstimuluscontrolbindings