Cargando…

A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?

Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of fewer than 12 months following systemic chemotherapy. In recent years, the identification of distinct molecular alterations with corresponding targeted therapies is modifying this thera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aimar, Giacomo, Paratore, Chiara, Zichi, Clizia, Marino, Donatella, Sperti, Elisa, Caglio, Andrea, Gamba, Teresa, De Vita, Francesca, Di Maio, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Exploration 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045702
http://dx.doi.org/10.37349/etat.2021.00056
_version_ 1784772814889287680
author Aimar, Giacomo
Paratore, Chiara
Zichi, Clizia
Marino, Donatella
Sperti, Elisa
Caglio, Andrea
Gamba, Teresa
De Vita, Francesca
Di Maio, Massimo
author_facet Aimar, Giacomo
Paratore, Chiara
Zichi, Clizia
Marino, Donatella
Sperti, Elisa
Caglio, Andrea
Gamba, Teresa
De Vita, Francesca
Di Maio, Massimo
author_sort Aimar, Giacomo
collection PubMed
description Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of fewer than 12 months following systemic chemotherapy. In recent years, the identification of distinct molecular alterations with corresponding targeted therapies is modifying this therapeutic algorithm. The aim of this review is to present an overview of targeted therapy for BTCs, describing published available data and potential future challenges in ongoing trials. From clinicaltrials.gov online database all ongoing trials for BTCs (any stage) was examinated in July 2021, and data regarding study design, disease characteristics and type of treatments were registered. Oncogenic-driven therapy (targeted therapy) was investigated in 67 trials. According to research, 15 ongoing trials (22.4%) are investigating fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR)-inhibitors in BTCs. Three (18.7%) are open-label randomized multicenter phase 3 trials, 8 (50%) are single-arm phase two trials, and 4 (25%) are phase one studies. Twelve (17.9%) clinical trials dealt with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 targeting therapy either in combination with cisplatin (Cis) and gemcitabine (Gem) as first-line treatment for BTCs or in monotherapy in patients with IDH1 mutant advanced malignancies, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Nine (13.4%) clinical trials tested human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 targeting therapy. Four (44.4%) studies are phase I trials, two (22.2%) are phase I/II trials, and three (33.3%) phase II trials. Rare molecular alterations in BTCs, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), and v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF), are also under investigation in a few trials. Forty-four clinical trials (17.2%) are investigating not oncogenic-driven multitarget therapy like multireceptor tyrosin kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenetic agents. In conclusion, this review shows that BTCs management is experiencing important innovations, especially in biomarker-based patient selection and in the new emerging therapeutic approach. Many ongoing trials could answer questions regarding the role of molecular inhibitors leading to new therapeutic frontiers for molecular subcategories of BTCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9400771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Open Exploration
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94007712022-08-30 A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? Aimar, Giacomo Paratore, Chiara Zichi, Clizia Marino, Donatella Sperti, Elisa Caglio, Andrea Gamba, Teresa De Vita, Francesca Di Maio, Massimo Explor Target Antitumor Ther Review Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of fewer than 12 months following systemic chemotherapy. In recent years, the identification of distinct molecular alterations with corresponding targeted therapies is modifying this therapeutic algorithm. The aim of this review is to present an overview of targeted therapy for BTCs, describing published available data and potential future challenges in ongoing trials. From clinicaltrials.gov online database all ongoing trials for BTCs (any stage) was examinated in July 2021, and data regarding study design, disease characteristics and type of treatments were registered. Oncogenic-driven therapy (targeted therapy) was investigated in 67 trials. According to research, 15 ongoing trials (22.4%) are investigating fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR)-inhibitors in BTCs. Three (18.7%) are open-label randomized multicenter phase 3 trials, 8 (50%) are single-arm phase two trials, and 4 (25%) are phase one studies. Twelve (17.9%) clinical trials dealt with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 targeting therapy either in combination with cisplatin (Cis) and gemcitabine (Gem) as first-line treatment for BTCs or in monotherapy in patients with IDH1 mutant advanced malignancies, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Nine (13.4%) clinical trials tested human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 targeting therapy. Four (44.4%) studies are phase I trials, two (22.2%) are phase I/II trials, and three (33.3%) phase II trials. Rare molecular alterations in BTCs, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), and v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF), are also under investigation in a few trials. Forty-four clinical trials (17.2%) are investigating not oncogenic-driven multitarget therapy like multireceptor tyrosin kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenetic agents. In conclusion, this review shows that BTCs management is experiencing important innovations, especially in biomarker-based patient selection and in the new emerging therapeutic approach. Many ongoing trials could answer questions regarding the role of molecular inhibitors leading to new therapeutic frontiers for molecular subcategories of BTCs. Open Exploration 2021 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9400771/ /pubmed/36045702 http://dx.doi.org/10.37349/etat.2021.00056 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Aimar, Giacomo
Paratore, Chiara
Zichi, Clizia
Marino, Donatella
Sperti, Elisa
Caglio, Andrea
Gamba, Teresa
De Vita, Francesca
Di Maio, Massimo
A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
title A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
title_full A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
title_fullStr A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
title_full_unstemmed A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
title_short A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
title_sort review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045702
http://dx.doi.org/10.37349/etat.2021.00056
work_keys_str_mv AT aimargiacomo areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT paratorechiara areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT zichiclizia areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT marinodonatella areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT spertielisa areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT caglioandrea areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT gambateresa areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT devitafrancesca areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT dimaiomassimo areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT aimargiacomo reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT paratorechiara reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT zichiclizia reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT marinodonatella reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT spertielisa reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT caglioandrea reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT gambateresa reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT devitafrancesca reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep
AT dimaiomassimo reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep