Cargando…
A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?
Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of fewer than 12 months following systemic chemotherapy. In recent years, the identification of distinct molecular alterations with corresponding targeted therapies is modifying this thera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Exploration
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045702 http://dx.doi.org/10.37349/etat.2021.00056 |
_version_ | 1784772814889287680 |
---|---|
author | Aimar, Giacomo Paratore, Chiara Zichi, Clizia Marino, Donatella Sperti, Elisa Caglio, Andrea Gamba, Teresa De Vita, Francesca Di Maio, Massimo |
author_facet | Aimar, Giacomo Paratore, Chiara Zichi, Clizia Marino, Donatella Sperti, Elisa Caglio, Andrea Gamba, Teresa De Vita, Francesca Di Maio, Massimo |
author_sort | Aimar, Giacomo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of fewer than 12 months following systemic chemotherapy. In recent years, the identification of distinct molecular alterations with corresponding targeted therapies is modifying this therapeutic algorithm. The aim of this review is to present an overview of targeted therapy for BTCs, describing published available data and potential future challenges in ongoing trials. From clinicaltrials.gov online database all ongoing trials for BTCs (any stage) was examinated in July 2021, and data regarding study design, disease characteristics and type of treatments were registered. Oncogenic-driven therapy (targeted therapy) was investigated in 67 trials. According to research, 15 ongoing trials (22.4%) are investigating fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR)-inhibitors in BTCs. Three (18.7%) are open-label randomized multicenter phase 3 trials, 8 (50%) are single-arm phase two trials, and 4 (25%) are phase one studies. Twelve (17.9%) clinical trials dealt with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 targeting therapy either in combination with cisplatin (Cis) and gemcitabine (Gem) as first-line treatment for BTCs or in monotherapy in patients with IDH1 mutant advanced malignancies, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Nine (13.4%) clinical trials tested human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 targeting therapy. Four (44.4%) studies are phase I trials, two (22.2%) are phase I/II trials, and three (33.3%) phase II trials. Rare molecular alterations in BTCs, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), and v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF), are also under investigation in a few trials. Forty-four clinical trials (17.2%) are investigating not oncogenic-driven multitarget therapy like multireceptor tyrosin kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenetic agents. In conclusion, this review shows that BTCs management is experiencing important innovations, especially in biomarker-based patient selection and in the new emerging therapeutic approach. Many ongoing trials could answer questions regarding the role of molecular inhibitors leading to new therapeutic frontiers for molecular subcategories of BTCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9400771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Open Exploration |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94007712022-08-30 A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? Aimar, Giacomo Paratore, Chiara Zichi, Clizia Marino, Donatella Sperti, Elisa Caglio, Andrea Gamba, Teresa De Vita, Francesca Di Maio, Massimo Explor Target Antitumor Ther Review Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of fewer than 12 months following systemic chemotherapy. In recent years, the identification of distinct molecular alterations with corresponding targeted therapies is modifying this therapeutic algorithm. The aim of this review is to present an overview of targeted therapy for BTCs, describing published available data and potential future challenges in ongoing trials. From clinicaltrials.gov online database all ongoing trials for BTCs (any stage) was examinated in July 2021, and data regarding study design, disease characteristics and type of treatments were registered. Oncogenic-driven therapy (targeted therapy) was investigated in 67 trials. According to research, 15 ongoing trials (22.4%) are investigating fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR)-inhibitors in BTCs. Three (18.7%) are open-label randomized multicenter phase 3 trials, 8 (50%) are single-arm phase two trials, and 4 (25%) are phase one studies. Twelve (17.9%) clinical trials dealt with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 targeting therapy either in combination with cisplatin (Cis) and gemcitabine (Gem) as first-line treatment for BTCs or in monotherapy in patients with IDH1 mutant advanced malignancies, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Nine (13.4%) clinical trials tested human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 targeting therapy. Four (44.4%) studies are phase I trials, two (22.2%) are phase I/II trials, and three (33.3%) phase II trials. Rare molecular alterations in BTCs, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), and v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF), are also under investigation in a few trials. Forty-four clinical trials (17.2%) are investigating not oncogenic-driven multitarget therapy like multireceptor tyrosin kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenetic agents. In conclusion, this review shows that BTCs management is experiencing important innovations, especially in biomarker-based patient selection and in the new emerging therapeutic approach. Many ongoing trials could answer questions regarding the role of molecular inhibitors leading to new therapeutic frontiers for molecular subcategories of BTCs. Open Exploration 2021 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9400771/ /pubmed/36045702 http://dx.doi.org/10.37349/etat.2021.00056 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Aimar, Giacomo Paratore, Chiara Zichi, Clizia Marino, Donatella Sperti, Elisa Caglio, Andrea Gamba, Teresa De Vita, Francesca Di Maio, Massimo A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? |
title | A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? |
title_full | A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? |
title_fullStr | A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? |
title_short | A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? |
title_sort | review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045702 http://dx.doi.org/10.37349/etat.2021.00056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aimargiacomo areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT paratorechiara areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT zichiclizia areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT marinodonatella areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT spertielisa areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT caglioandrea areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT gambateresa areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT devitafrancesca areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT dimaiomassimo areviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT aimargiacomo reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT paratorechiara reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT zichiclizia reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT marinodonatella reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT spertielisa reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT caglioandrea reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT gambateresa reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT devitafrancesca reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep AT dimaiomassimo reviewofmolecularlytargetedtherapyinbiliarytractcarcinomawhatisthenextstep |