Cargando…

Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework

Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions have resulted in a paradigm shift in understanding the temporal changes in the Earth's gravity field and its drivers. To provide continuous observations to the user community, missing monthly solutions within and b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rateb, Ashraf, Sun, Alexander, Scanlon, Bridget R., Save, Himanshu, Hasan, Emad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002162
_version_ 1784772835377414144
author Rateb, Ashraf
Sun, Alexander
Scanlon, Bridget R.
Save, Himanshu
Hasan, Emad
author_facet Rateb, Ashraf
Sun, Alexander
Scanlon, Bridget R.
Save, Himanshu
Hasan, Emad
author_sort Rateb, Ashraf
collection PubMed
description Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions have resulted in a paradigm shift in understanding the temporal changes in the Earth's gravity field and its drivers. To provide continuous observations to the user community, missing monthly solutions within and between GRACE (‐FO) missions (33 solutions) need to be imputed. Here, we modeled GRACE (‐FO) data (196 solutions) between 04/2002–04/2021 to infer missing solutions and derive uncertainties in the existing and missing observations using Bayesian inference. First, we parametrized the GRACE (‐FO) time series using an additive generative model comprising long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variations), annual, and semi‐annual cycles. Informative priors for each component were used and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was applied to generate 2,000 samples for each component to quantify the posterior distributions. Second, we reconstructed the new data (229 solutions) by joining medians of posterior distributions of all components and adding back the residuals to secure the variability of the original data. Results show that the reconstructed solutions explain 99% of the variability of the original data at the basin scale and 78% at the one‐degree grid scale. The results outperform other reconstructed data in terms of accuracy relative to land surface modeling. Our data‐driven approach relies only on GRACE (‐FO) observations and provides a total uncertainty over GRACE (‐FO) data from the data‐generation process perspective. Moreover, the predictive posterior distribution can be potentially used for “nowcasting” in GRACE (‐FO) near‐real‐time applications (e.g., data assimilations), which minimize the current mission data latency (40–60 days).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9400854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94008542022-08-26 Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework Rateb, Ashraf Sun, Alexander Scanlon, Bridget R. Save, Himanshu Hasan, Emad Earth Space Sci Data Article Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and its Follow On (GRACE (‐FO)) missions have resulted in a paradigm shift in understanding the temporal changes in the Earth's gravity field and its drivers. To provide continuous observations to the user community, missing monthly solutions within and between GRACE (‐FO) missions (33 solutions) need to be imputed. Here, we modeled GRACE (‐FO) data (196 solutions) between 04/2002–04/2021 to infer missing solutions and derive uncertainties in the existing and missing observations using Bayesian inference. First, we parametrized the GRACE (‐FO) time series using an additive generative model comprising long‐term variability (secular trend + interannual to decadal variations), annual, and semi‐annual cycles. Informative priors for each component were used and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was applied to generate 2,000 samples for each component to quantify the posterior distributions. Second, we reconstructed the new data (229 solutions) by joining medians of posterior distributions of all components and adding back the residuals to secure the variability of the original data. Results show that the reconstructed solutions explain 99% of the variability of the original data at the basin scale and 78% at the one‐degree grid scale. The results outperform other reconstructed data in terms of accuracy relative to land surface modeling. Our data‐driven approach relies only on GRACE (‐FO) observations and provides a total uncertainty over GRACE (‐FO) data from the data‐generation process perspective. Moreover, the predictive posterior distribution can be potentially used for “nowcasting” in GRACE (‐FO) near‐real‐time applications (e.g., data assimilations), which minimize the current mission data latency (40–60 days). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-07 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9400854/ /pubmed/36032558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002162 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Earth and Space Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Data Article
Rateb, Ashraf
Sun, Alexander
Scanlon, Bridget R.
Save, Himanshu
Hasan, Emad
Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework
title Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework
title_full Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework
title_fullStr Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework
title_short Reconstruction of GRACE Mass Change Time Series Using a Bayesian Framework
title_sort reconstruction of grace mass change time series using a bayesian framework
topic Data Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002162
work_keys_str_mv AT ratebashraf reconstructionofgracemasschangetimeseriesusingabayesianframework
AT sunalexander reconstructionofgracemasschangetimeseriesusingabayesianframework
AT scanlonbridgetr reconstructionofgracemasschangetimeseriesusingabayesianframework
AT savehimanshu reconstructionofgracemasschangetimeseriesusingabayesianframework
AT hasanemad reconstructionofgracemasschangetimeseriesusingabayesianframework