Cargando…

Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue

BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis patients, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation may result in central venous stenosis (CVS) with associated symptoms, such as pain, edema of the ipsilateral arm, facial edema, and loss of dialysis access. However, literature concerning CVS in dialysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timal, Rohit J, Karalis, Ioannis, Cabezas, Jose M Montero, Rotmans, Joris I, Hensen, Liselotte C R, Buiten, Maurits S., de Bie, Mihaly K, van Erven, Lieselot, Putter, Hein, Schalij, Martin J., Rabelink, Ton J, Jukema, J Wouter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016586
http://dx.doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920253
_version_ 1784772892430434304
author Timal, Rohit J
Karalis, Ioannis
Cabezas, Jose M Montero
Rotmans, Joris I
Hensen, Liselotte C R
Buiten, Maurits S.
de Bie, Mihaly K
van Erven, Lieselot
Putter, Hein
Schalij, Martin J.
Rabelink, Ton J
Jukema, J Wouter
author_facet Timal, Rohit J
Karalis, Ioannis
Cabezas, Jose M Montero
Rotmans, Joris I
Hensen, Liselotte C R
Buiten, Maurits S.
de Bie, Mihaly K
van Erven, Lieselot
Putter, Hein
Schalij, Martin J.
Rabelink, Ton J
Jukema, J Wouter
author_sort Timal, Rohit J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis patients, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation may result in central venous stenosis (CVS) with associated symptoms, such as pain, edema of the ipsilateral arm, facial edema, and loss of dialysis access. However, literature concerning CVS in dialysis patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device is scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in which we investigated the incidence of CVS in end-stage renal disease patients on chronic dialysis who received an ICD as part of participation in the randomized ICD2 trial. A venography was performed before ICD implantation and at 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2017, 80 patients on dialysis received an ICD according to ICD2 trial protocol. Our population mainly consisted of males (76.3%), and had a median age of 67 years. Hemodialysis was the predominant dialysis modality (71.3%). The ICD was implanted in the right pectoral region in 58 patients (72.5%). A minority of the patients (27.5%) had a history of central venous catheters use, ipsilateral to ICD implantation site. Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 13–35). Prospective assessment of central vein patency was possible in 56 patients (70.0%). Partial obstruction of central vein at follow-up was present in 19 out of 56 patients (33.9%) and complete occlusion in 4 patients (7.1%). With a complete clinical follow-up of all patients with a median duration of 3.5 years (IQR 2.7 – 6.3), 3 patients developed clinically significant symptoms of CVS. CONCLUSIONS: Development of CVS in patients on chronic dialysis who received an ICD is a cause of concern. Prevention of such complications deserves attention and further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN20479861
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9401088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94010882022-08-24 Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue Timal, Rohit J Karalis, Ioannis Cabezas, Jose M Montero Rotmans, Joris I Hensen, Liselotte C R Buiten, Maurits S. de Bie, Mihaly K van Erven, Lieselot Putter, Hein Schalij, Martin J. Rabelink, Ton J Jukema, J Wouter Cardiol Cardiovasc Med Article BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis patients, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation may result in central venous stenosis (CVS) with associated symptoms, such as pain, edema of the ipsilateral arm, facial edema, and loss of dialysis access. However, literature concerning CVS in dialysis patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device is scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in which we investigated the incidence of CVS in end-stage renal disease patients on chronic dialysis who received an ICD as part of participation in the randomized ICD2 trial. A venography was performed before ICD implantation and at 1 year follow-up. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2017, 80 patients on dialysis received an ICD according to ICD2 trial protocol. Our population mainly consisted of males (76.3%), and had a median age of 67 years. Hemodialysis was the predominant dialysis modality (71.3%). The ICD was implanted in the right pectoral region in 58 patients (72.5%). A minority of the patients (27.5%) had a history of central venous catheters use, ipsilateral to ICD implantation site. Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 13–35). Prospective assessment of central vein patency was possible in 56 patients (70.0%). Partial obstruction of central vein at follow-up was present in 19 out of 56 patients (33.9%) and complete occlusion in 4 patients (7.1%). With a complete clinical follow-up of all patients with a median duration of 3.5 years (IQR 2.7 – 6.3), 3 patients developed clinically significant symptoms of CVS. CONCLUSIONS: Development of CVS in patients on chronic dialysis who received an ICD is a cause of concern. Prevention of such complications deserves attention and further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN20479861 2022-04 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9401088/ /pubmed/36016586 http://dx.doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920253 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Timal, Rohit J
Karalis, Ioannis
Cabezas, Jose M Montero
Rotmans, Joris I
Hensen, Liselotte C R
Buiten, Maurits S.
de Bie, Mihaly K
van Erven, Lieselot
Putter, Hein
Schalij, Martin J.
Rabelink, Ton J
Jukema, J Wouter
Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue
title Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue
title_full Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue
title_fullStr Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue
title_full_unstemmed Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue
title_short Development of Central Venous Stenosis Upon ICD Implantation in Dialysis Patients: A Non-Negligible Issue
title_sort development of central venous stenosis upon icd implantation in dialysis patients: a non-negligible issue
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36016586
http://dx.doi.org/10.26502/fccm.92920253
work_keys_str_mv AT timalrohitj developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT karalisioannis developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT cabezasjosemmontero developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT rotmansjorisi developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT hensenliselottecr developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT buitenmauritss developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT debiemihalyk developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT vanervenlieselot developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT putterhein developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT schalijmartinj developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT rabelinktonj developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue
AT jukemajwouter developmentofcentralvenousstenosisuponicdimplantationindialysispatientsanonnegligibleissue