Cargando…
Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgical systems introduce new opportunities for the minimal accessed surgeon. The combination of three-dimensional magnified vision and articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom provide a good and safe alternative to laparoscopic surgery. Indeed some of these feature...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09526-x |
_version_ | 1784772916935655424 |
---|---|
author | Wehrmann, Stefan Tischendorf, Kristin Mehlhorn, Torsten Lorenz, Annelie Gündel, Michael Rudolph, Hagen Mirow, Lutz |
author_facet | Wehrmann, Stefan Tischendorf, Kristin Mehlhorn, Torsten Lorenz, Annelie Gündel, Michael Rudolph, Hagen Mirow, Lutz |
author_sort | Wehrmann, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robotic surgical systems introduce new opportunities for the minimal accessed surgeon. The combination of three-dimensional magnified vision and articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom provide a good and safe alternative to laparoscopic surgery. Indeed some of these features may support the case that robotic surgery may be better than conventional surgery. In this study, we report our experience of robotic surgery by using the first open console, modular robotic platform in Germany, the Versius Surgical System®. METHODS: We implemented the Versius Surgical System® in April 2021 at our centre. Since then, 175 patients received robotic assisted surgery. All patients were included in this study. Data were analysed by using the SPSS (IBM Statistics) Software. RESULTS: 175 patients underwent robotic surgery. We started the implementation of the system by performing cholecystectomy. After the first 50 successful operations, we began to perform robotic assisted oncological resections. We saw a learning curve with improvements in total operative time and console time until reaching a standard similar to conventional laparoscopic surgery. The perioperative complication-ratio was equivalent for operations matched the histopathological outcome (MERCURY graduation, R0-staus) at oncological resections. However, four patients had to be revised because of secondary bleeding. Interestingly the total hospital stay for right sided hemicolectomy and oesophagus-resection was shorter than in laparoscopic surgery. SUMMARY: In our opinion, the Versius Surgical System® seems to be a good, promising system and a safe alternative to other robotic systems, although any comparison is still missing. The open design enabling a better communication between console surgeon and bedside-unit assistant as well as the mobile bedside units are very interesting and allow more flexibility. Nevertheless, there are limitations of the system that require a direct comparison with other robotic systems as well as continuous advancement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9401193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94011932022-08-25 Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients Wehrmann, Stefan Tischendorf, Kristin Mehlhorn, Torsten Lorenz, Annelie Gündel, Michael Rudolph, Hagen Mirow, Lutz Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Robotic surgical systems introduce new opportunities for the minimal accessed surgeon. The combination of three-dimensional magnified vision and articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom provide a good and safe alternative to laparoscopic surgery. Indeed some of these features may support the case that robotic surgery may be better than conventional surgery. In this study, we report our experience of robotic surgery by using the first open console, modular robotic platform in Germany, the Versius Surgical System®. METHODS: We implemented the Versius Surgical System® in April 2021 at our centre. Since then, 175 patients received robotic assisted surgery. All patients were included in this study. Data were analysed by using the SPSS (IBM Statistics) Software. RESULTS: 175 patients underwent robotic surgery. We started the implementation of the system by performing cholecystectomy. After the first 50 successful operations, we began to perform robotic assisted oncological resections. We saw a learning curve with improvements in total operative time and console time until reaching a standard similar to conventional laparoscopic surgery. The perioperative complication-ratio was equivalent for operations matched the histopathological outcome (MERCURY graduation, R0-staus) at oncological resections. However, four patients had to be revised because of secondary bleeding. Interestingly the total hospital stay for right sided hemicolectomy and oesophagus-resection was shorter than in laparoscopic surgery. SUMMARY: In our opinion, the Versius Surgical System® seems to be a good, promising system and a safe alternative to other robotic systems, although any comparison is still missing. The open design enabling a better communication between console surgeon and bedside-unit assistant as well as the mobile bedside units are very interesting and allow more flexibility. Nevertheless, there are limitations of the system that require a direct comparison with other robotic systems as well as continuous advancement. Springer US 2022-08-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9401193/ /pubmed/36002682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09526-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wehrmann, Stefan Tischendorf, Kristin Mehlhorn, Torsten Lorenz, Annelie Gündel, Michael Rudolph, Hagen Mirow, Lutz Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients |
title | Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients |
title_full | Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients |
title_fullStr | Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients |
title_short | Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients |
title_sort | clinical implementation of the versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-a single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09526-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wehrmannstefan clinicalimplementationoftheversiusroboticsurgicalsysteminvisceralsurgeryasinglecentreexperienceandreviewofthefirst175patients AT tischendorfkristin clinicalimplementationoftheversiusroboticsurgicalsysteminvisceralsurgeryasinglecentreexperienceandreviewofthefirst175patients AT mehlhorntorsten clinicalimplementationoftheversiusroboticsurgicalsysteminvisceralsurgeryasinglecentreexperienceandreviewofthefirst175patients AT lorenzannelie clinicalimplementationoftheversiusroboticsurgicalsysteminvisceralsurgeryasinglecentreexperienceandreviewofthefirst175patients AT gundelmichael clinicalimplementationoftheversiusroboticsurgicalsysteminvisceralsurgeryasinglecentreexperienceandreviewofthefirst175patients AT rudolphhagen clinicalimplementationoftheversiusroboticsurgicalsysteminvisceralsurgeryasinglecentreexperienceandreviewofthefirst175patients AT mirowlutz clinicalimplementationoftheversiusroboticsurgicalsysteminvisceralsurgeryasinglecentreexperienceandreviewofthefirst175patients |