Cargando…

Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety

Background: Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (PTP) is the mainstay prevention strategy for venous thromboembolism (VTE). PTP agents traditionally dosed, like unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin (ENOX), are associated with failure and bleeding in obese and underweight patients, respectively....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anthony Hawkins, W., Smith, Susan E., Stitt, Tia M., Abdulla, Aliya, Branan, Trisha N., Hall, Ronald G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033114
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v12i4.4288
_version_ 1784772957329948672
author Anthony Hawkins, W.
Smith, Susan E.
Stitt, Tia M.
Abdulla, Aliya
Branan, Trisha N.
Hall, Ronald G.
author_facet Anthony Hawkins, W.
Smith, Susan E.
Stitt, Tia M.
Abdulla, Aliya
Branan, Trisha N.
Hall, Ronald G.
author_sort Anthony Hawkins, W.
collection PubMed
description Background: Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (PTP) is the mainstay prevention strategy for venous thromboembolism (VTE). PTP agents traditionally dosed, like unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin (ENOX), are associated with failure and bleeding in obese and underweight patients, respectively. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the prevalence of unadjusted ENOX and UFH dosing for PTP based on anthropometric measures. Patients/Methods:This was a post-hoc, multicenter, cross–sectional analysis of critically ill adults receiving PTP with ENOX or UFH. The primary outcome was the prevalence of unadjusted PTP based on body mass index (BMI) and total body weight (TBW). Definitions for dose adjustments were developed based on existing literature. A secondary outcome was to identify factors associated with unadjusted dosing per BMI and TBW using multivariable generalized linear mixed-effect models. Results: The nested cohort included 172 patients (ENOX=46, UFH=126). Unadjusted PTP was observed in 118 patients (68.6%) based on BMI and 74 (43%) per TBW. When comparing UFH to ENOX, more patients who received UFH had doses unadjusted by BMI (78.6% vs. 41.3%, p<0.05) but not TBW (43.7% vs. 41.3%). Factors independently associated with unadjusted PTP per BMI were receipt of UFH (OR 6.93, 95% CI 1.06-8.77) or a BMI underweight or overweight/obese (OR 10.45, 95% CI 4.38-24.92). Having a TBW <50kg or >100kg (OR 4.85, 95% CI 2.15-10.96) were independently associated with unadjusted PTP based on TBW. Conclusions: Unadjusted dosing of PTP occurs frequently in critically ill adults receiving ENOX or UFH. This was seen in body size extremes by both BMI and TBW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9401384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94013842022-08-25 Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety Anthony Hawkins, W. Smith, Susan E. Stitt, Tia M. Abdulla, Aliya Branan, Trisha N. Hall, Ronald G. Innov Pharm Idea Paper Background: Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (PTP) is the mainstay prevention strategy for venous thromboembolism (VTE). PTP agents traditionally dosed, like unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin (ENOX), are associated with failure and bleeding in obese and underweight patients, respectively. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the prevalence of unadjusted ENOX and UFH dosing for PTP based on anthropometric measures. Patients/Methods:This was a post-hoc, multicenter, cross–sectional analysis of critically ill adults receiving PTP with ENOX or UFH. The primary outcome was the prevalence of unadjusted PTP based on body mass index (BMI) and total body weight (TBW). Definitions for dose adjustments were developed based on existing literature. A secondary outcome was to identify factors associated with unadjusted dosing per BMI and TBW using multivariable generalized linear mixed-effect models. Results: The nested cohort included 172 patients (ENOX=46, UFH=126). Unadjusted PTP was observed in 118 patients (68.6%) based on BMI and 74 (43%) per TBW. When comparing UFH to ENOX, more patients who received UFH had doses unadjusted by BMI (78.6% vs. 41.3%, p<0.05) but not TBW (43.7% vs. 41.3%). Factors independently associated with unadjusted PTP per BMI were receipt of UFH (OR 6.93, 95% CI 1.06-8.77) or a BMI underweight or overweight/obese (OR 10.45, 95% CI 4.38-24.92). Having a TBW <50kg or >100kg (OR 4.85, 95% CI 2.15-10.96) were independently associated with unadjusted PTP based on TBW. Conclusions: Unadjusted dosing of PTP occurs frequently in critically ill adults receiving ENOX or UFH. This was seen in body size extremes by both BMI and TBW. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2021-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9401384/ /pubmed/36033114 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v12i4.4288 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Idea Paper
Anthony Hawkins, W.
Smith, Susan E.
Stitt, Tia M.
Abdulla, Aliya
Branan, Trisha N.
Hall, Ronald G.
Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety
title Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety
title_full Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety
title_fullStr Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety
title_full_unstemmed Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety
title_short Low Prevalence of Thrombosis Prophylaxis Dose Adjustments Highlights Implications for Patient Safety
title_sort low prevalence of thrombosis prophylaxis dose adjustments highlights implications for patient safety
topic Idea Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033114
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v12i4.4288
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonyhawkinsw lowprevalenceofthrombosisprophylaxisdoseadjustmentshighlightsimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT smithsusane lowprevalenceofthrombosisprophylaxisdoseadjustmentshighlightsimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT stitttiam lowprevalenceofthrombosisprophylaxisdoseadjustmentshighlightsimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT abdullaaliya lowprevalenceofthrombosisprophylaxisdoseadjustmentshighlightsimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT branantrishan lowprevalenceofthrombosisprophylaxisdoseadjustmentshighlightsimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT hallronaldg lowprevalenceofthrombosisprophylaxisdoseadjustmentshighlightsimplicationsforpatientsafety