Cargando…

A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

PURPOSE: Glutamine is a critical fuel for solid tumors. Interference with glutamine metabolism is deleterious to neoplasia in preclinical models. A phase I study of the oral, first-in-class, glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor telaglenastat was conducted in treatment-refractory solid tumor patients to defin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding, James J., Telli, Melinda, Munster, Pamela, Voss, Martin H., Infante, Jeffrey R., DeMichele, Angela, Dunphy, Mark, Le, Mai H., Molineaux, Chris, Orford, Keith, Parlati, Frank, Whiting, Sam H., Bennett, Mark K., Tannir, Nizar M., Meric-Bernstam, Funda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1204
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Glutamine is a critical fuel for solid tumors. Interference with glutamine metabolism is deleterious to neoplasia in preclinical models. A phase I study of the oral, first-in-class, glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor telaglenastat was conducted in treatment-refractory solid tumor patients to define recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose escalation by 3 + 3 design was followed by exploratory tumor-/biomarker-specific cohorts. RESULTS: Among 120 patients, fatigue (23%) and nausea (19%) were the most common toxicity. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Correlative analysis indicated >90% GLS inhibition in platelets at plasma exposures >300 nmol/L, >75% tumoral GLS inhibition, and significant increase in circulating glutamine. RP2D was defined at 800 mg twice-daily. Disease control rate (DCR) was 43% across expansion cohorts (overall response rate 5%, DCR 50% in renal cell carcinoma). CONCLUSIONS: Telaglenastat is safe, with a favorable PK/PD profile and signal of antitumor activity, supporting further clinical development.