Cargando…
A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
PURPOSE: Glutamine is a critical fuel for solid tumors. Interference with glutamine metabolism is deleterious to neoplasia in preclinical models. A phase I study of the oral, first-in-class, glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor telaglenastat was conducted in treatment-refractory solid tumor patients to defin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for Cancer Research
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1204 |
_version_ | 1784772980338851840 |
---|---|
author | Harding, James J. Telli, Melinda Munster, Pamela Voss, Martin H. Infante, Jeffrey R. DeMichele, Angela Dunphy, Mark Le, Mai H. Molineaux, Chris Orford, Keith Parlati, Frank Whiting, Sam H. Bennett, Mark K. Tannir, Nizar M. Meric-Bernstam, Funda |
author_facet | Harding, James J. Telli, Melinda Munster, Pamela Voss, Martin H. Infante, Jeffrey R. DeMichele, Angela Dunphy, Mark Le, Mai H. Molineaux, Chris Orford, Keith Parlati, Frank Whiting, Sam H. Bennett, Mark K. Tannir, Nizar M. Meric-Bernstam, Funda |
author_sort | Harding, James J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Glutamine is a critical fuel for solid tumors. Interference with glutamine metabolism is deleterious to neoplasia in preclinical models. A phase I study of the oral, first-in-class, glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor telaglenastat was conducted in treatment-refractory solid tumor patients to define recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose escalation by 3 + 3 design was followed by exploratory tumor-/biomarker-specific cohorts. RESULTS: Among 120 patients, fatigue (23%) and nausea (19%) were the most common toxicity. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Correlative analysis indicated >90% GLS inhibition in platelets at plasma exposures >300 nmol/L, >75% tumoral GLS inhibition, and significant increase in circulating glutamine. RP2D was defined at 800 mg twice-daily. Disease control rate (DCR) was 43% across expansion cohorts (overall response rate 5%, DCR 50% in renal cell carcinoma). CONCLUSIONS: Telaglenastat is safe, with a favorable PK/PD profile and signal of antitumor activity, supporting further clinical development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9401498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Association for Cancer Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94014982023-01-05 A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Harding, James J. Telli, Melinda Munster, Pamela Voss, Martin H. Infante, Jeffrey R. DeMichele, Angela Dunphy, Mark Le, Mai H. Molineaux, Chris Orford, Keith Parlati, Frank Whiting, Sam H. Bennett, Mark K. Tannir, Nizar M. Meric-Bernstam, Funda Clin Cancer Res Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy PURPOSE: Glutamine is a critical fuel for solid tumors. Interference with glutamine metabolism is deleterious to neoplasia in preclinical models. A phase I study of the oral, first-in-class, glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor telaglenastat was conducted in treatment-refractory solid tumor patients to define recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose escalation by 3 + 3 design was followed by exploratory tumor-/biomarker-specific cohorts. RESULTS: Among 120 patients, fatigue (23%) and nausea (19%) were the most common toxicity. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Correlative analysis indicated >90% GLS inhibition in platelets at plasma exposures >300 nmol/L, >75% tumoral GLS inhibition, and significant increase in circulating glutamine. RP2D was defined at 800 mg twice-daily. Disease control rate (DCR) was 43% across expansion cohorts (overall response rate 5%, DCR 50% in renal cell carcinoma). CONCLUSIONS: Telaglenastat is safe, with a favorable PK/PD profile and signal of antitumor activity, supporting further clinical development. American Association for Cancer Research 2021-09-15 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9401498/ /pubmed/34285061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1204 Text en ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy Harding, James J. Telli, Melinda Munster, Pamela Voss, Martin H. Infante, Jeffrey R. DeMichele, Angela Dunphy, Mark Le, Mai H. Molineaux, Chris Orford, Keith Parlati, Frank Whiting, Sam H. Bennett, Mark K. Tannir, Nizar M. Meric-Bernstam, Funda A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors |
title | A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors |
title_full | A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors |
title_fullStr | A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors |
title_short | A Phase I Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Telaglenastat in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors |
title_sort | phase i dose-escalation and expansion study of telaglenastat in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors |
topic | Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9401498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardingjamesj aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT tellimelinda aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT munsterpamela aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT vossmartinh aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT infantejeffreyr aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT demicheleangela aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT dunphymark aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT lemaih aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT molineauxchris aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT orfordkeith aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT parlatifrank aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT whitingsamh aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT bennettmarkk aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT tannirnizarm aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT mericbernstamfunda aphaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT hardingjamesj phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT tellimelinda phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT munsterpamela phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT vossmartinh phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT infantejeffreyr phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT demicheleangela phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT dunphymark phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT lemaih phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT molineauxchris phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT orfordkeith phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT parlatifrank phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT whitingsamh phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT bennettmarkk phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT tannirnizarm phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors AT mericbernstamfunda phaseidoseescalationandexpansionstudyoftelaglenastatinpatientswithadvancedormetastaticsolidtumors |