Cargando…

Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 5-year results of single and multiple recession type (RT) 1 and 2 (Miller I to III) recessions treated with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and connective tissue graft (CTG) with or without an enamel matrix derivative (EMD). The main outcome variable was the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stähli, A., Duong, H. Y., Imber, J. C., Roccuzzo, A., Salvi, G. E., Katsaros, C., Ramseier, C. A., Sculean, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04691-8
_version_ 1784773139408879616
author Stähli, A.
Duong, H. Y.
Imber, J. C.
Roccuzzo, A.
Salvi, G. E.
Katsaros, C.
Ramseier, C. A.
Sculean, A.
author_facet Stähli, A.
Duong, H. Y.
Imber, J. C.
Roccuzzo, A.
Salvi, G. E.
Katsaros, C.
Ramseier, C. A.
Sculean, A.
author_sort Stähli, A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 5-year results of single and multiple recession type (RT) 1 and 2 (Miller I to III) recessions treated with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and connective tissue graft (CTG) with or without an enamel matrix derivative (EMD). The main outcome variable was the stability of obtained root coverage from 6 months to 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients, both complete and mean root coverage (CRC and MRC) and gain of keratinised tissue (KT) were assessed at 6 months and 5 years after recession coverage by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD. Aesthetic outcomes after 5 years were evaluated using the root coverage aesthetic score (RES). RESULTS: At 5 years, 24 patients with a total of 43 recessions were evaluated. Eight patients (57.14%) of the test and 6 (60.0%) of the control group showed complete root coverage. MRC revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, with 73.87 ± 26.83% (test) and 75.04 ± 22.06% (control), respectively. KT increased from 1.14 ± 0.57 mm to 3.07 ± 2.27 mm in the test group and from 1.24 ± 0.92 mm to 3.02 ± 1.55 mm in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 recessions by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD yielded comparable clinical improvements which could be maintained over a period of 5 years. The additional use of EMD did not influence the clinical outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of MCAT + CTG yielded successful coverage of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 gingival recessions, while the additional application of EMD did not seem to influence the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9402279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94022792022-08-25 Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial Stähli, A. Duong, H. Y. Imber, J. C. Roccuzzo, A. Salvi, G. E. Katsaros, C. Ramseier, C. A. Sculean, A. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 5-year results of single and multiple recession type (RT) 1 and 2 (Miller I to III) recessions treated with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and connective tissue graft (CTG) with or without an enamel matrix derivative (EMD). The main outcome variable was the stability of obtained root coverage from 6 months to 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients, both complete and mean root coverage (CRC and MRC) and gain of keratinised tissue (KT) were assessed at 6 months and 5 years after recession coverage by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD. Aesthetic outcomes after 5 years were evaluated using the root coverage aesthetic score (RES). RESULTS: At 5 years, 24 patients with a total of 43 recessions were evaluated. Eight patients (57.14%) of the test and 6 (60.0%) of the control group showed complete root coverage. MRC revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, with 73.87 ± 26.83% (test) and 75.04 ± 22.06% (control), respectively. KT increased from 1.14 ± 0.57 mm to 3.07 ± 2.27 mm in the test group and from 1.24 ± 0.92 mm to 3.02 ± 1.55 mm in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 recessions by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD yielded comparable clinical improvements which could be maintained over a period of 5 years. The additional use of EMD did not influence the clinical outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of MCAT + CTG yielded successful coverage of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 gingival recessions, while the additional application of EMD did not seem to influence the results. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9402279/ /pubmed/36002594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04691-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Stähli, A.
Duong, H. Y.
Imber, J. C.
Roccuzzo, A.
Salvi, G. E.
Katsaros, C.
Ramseier, C. A.
Sculean, A.
Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
title Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
title_full Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
title_short Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
title_sort recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04691-8
work_keys_str_mv AT stahlia recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT duonghy recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT imberjc recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT roccuzzoa recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT salvige recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT katsarosc recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT ramseierca recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial
AT sculeana recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial