Cargando…
Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 5-year results of single and multiple recession type (RT) 1 and 2 (Miller I to III) recessions treated with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and connective tissue graft (CTG) with or without an enamel matrix derivative (EMD). The main outcome variable was the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04691-8 |
_version_ | 1784773139408879616 |
---|---|
author | Stähli, A. Duong, H. Y. Imber, J. C. Roccuzzo, A. Salvi, G. E. Katsaros, C. Ramseier, C. A. Sculean, A. |
author_facet | Stähli, A. Duong, H. Y. Imber, J. C. Roccuzzo, A. Salvi, G. E. Katsaros, C. Ramseier, C. A. Sculean, A. |
author_sort | Stähli, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 5-year results of single and multiple recession type (RT) 1 and 2 (Miller I to III) recessions treated with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and connective tissue graft (CTG) with or without an enamel matrix derivative (EMD). The main outcome variable was the stability of obtained root coverage from 6 months to 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients, both complete and mean root coverage (CRC and MRC) and gain of keratinised tissue (KT) were assessed at 6 months and 5 years after recession coverage by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD. Aesthetic outcomes after 5 years were evaluated using the root coverage aesthetic score (RES). RESULTS: At 5 years, 24 patients with a total of 43 recessions were evaluated. Eight patients (57.14%) of the test and 6 (60.0%) of the control group showed complete root coverage. MRC revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, with 73.87 ± 26.83% (test) and 75.04 ± 22.06% (control), respectively. KT increased from 1.14 ± 0.57 mm to 3.07 ± 2.27 mm in the test group and from 1.24 ± 0.92 mm to 3.02 ± 1.55 mm in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 recessions by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD yielded comparable clinical improvements which could be maintained over a period of 5 years. The additional use of EMD did not influence the clinical outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of MCAT + CTG yielded successful coverage of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 gingival recessions, while the additional application of EMD did not seem to influence the results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9402279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94022792022-08-25 Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial Stähli, A. Duong, H. Y. Imber, J. C. Roccuzzo, A. Salvi, G. E. Katsaros, C. Ramseier, C. A. Sculean, A. Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 5-year results of single and multiple recession type (RT) 1 and 2 (Miller I to III) recessions treated with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and connective tissue graft (CTG) with or without an enamel matrix derivative (EMD). The main outcome variable was the stability of obtained root coverage from 6 months to 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 patients, both complete and mean root coverage (CRC and MRC) and gain of keratinised tissue (KT) were assessed at 6 months and 5 years after recession coverage by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD. Aesthetic outcomes after 5 years were evaluated using the root coverage aesthetic score (RES). RESULTS: At 5 years, 24 patients with a total of 43 recessions were evaluated. Eight patients (57.14%) of the test and 6 (60.0%) of the control group showed complete root coverage. MRC revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, with 73.87 ± 26.83% (test) and 75.04 ± 22.06% (control), respectively. KT increased from 1.14 ± 0.57 mm to 3.07 ± 2.27 mm in the test group and from 1.24 ± 0.92 mm to 3.02 ± 1.55 mm in the control group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 recessions by means of MCAT and CTG with or without EMD yielded comparable clinical improvements which could be maintained over a period of 5 years. The additional use of EMD did not influence the clinical outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of MCAT + CTG yielded successful coverage of single and multiple RT 1 and 2 gingival recessions, while the additional application of EMD did not seem to influence the results. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9402279/ /pubmed/36002594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04691-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stähli, A. Duong, H. Y. Imber, J. C. Roccuzzo, A. Salvi, G. E. Katsaros, C. Ramseier, C. A. Sculean, A. Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial |
title | Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | recession coverage using the modified coronally advanced tunnel and connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative: 5-year results of a randomised clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04691-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stahlia recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial AT duonghy recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial AT imberjc recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial AT roccuzzoa recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial AT salvige recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial AT katsarosc recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial AT ramseierca recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial AT sculeana recessioncoverageusingthemodifiedcoronallyadvancedtunnelandconnectivetissuegraftwithorwithoutenamelmatrixderivative5yearresultsofarandomisedclinicaltrial |